IMF: India to outgrow China

[jamahir]

In terms of GDP/capita. Of course China will have more technology than tiny Sri Lanka.

the technicality of gdp/capita is not the right measure... if one must include money, then delivering economic welfare, justice, parity and comforts should have been the goal... totally a welfare society, like libyan jamahiriya.

what's the point of buying 125 western fighter planes when one's country has become "suicide capital of the world"??

Pakistan and India, unlike BD and Sri Lanka, have no dominant ethnicity to drive the rest of the country forward. Their, India more than Pakistan, primary focus is always on keeping the different ethnicities happy rather than on the fastest economic development.

true enough... i only disagree with your "faster economic development" part... economics has no future because money system must be eradicated and will be in any sensible near-future humanity.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

sorry, we don't need to use such mba/corporate/it words... verticals, centers of excellence, leverage, core competency, ctc, bellwether, big data... such ridiculous language may have been created in usa but it finds its welcoming home in india... and the sensible americans themselves question and reject such language... ( Business Buzzword Bingo! ) and ( Bullshit Bingo [Random!] ).

let the idiots of coolie-valley bangalore or poona or gurgaon use this nonsense language... for the rest of humans, simple language is always better... and let's throw the mba types into the sea.

--
fine. but topic is IMF so they mean business .. and if business terms will come...
yes jargon is used as showoff.. but there are few terminolgies which are necessary concept..
IMF is all about money. project, value .. returns .. so big data big system from excel to sap isneeded ..--
---
they themselves use it.. so nothing new dear
Finance & Development, June 2001 - Competition and Business Entry in Russia
Competition and Business Entry in Russia
Harry G. Broadman


There remains considerable potential for abuse of market power, not only in Russia's infrastructure monopoly ("utility") sector (this potential is widely acknowledged, and the government's structural reform agenda includes policy initiatives designed to reduce it) but also in the manufacturing ("nonutility") sector. Many manufacturing firms are shielded from competition because of structural and institutional impediments, including significant seller and buyer concentration—"horizontal dominance"—in regional markets, a high degree of vertical integration and exclusive buyer-seller relationships in certain industrial sectors, geographic segmentation, interregional barriers to trade and investment, and policies that make entry difficult for new firms. These impediments are more pronounced in Russia than in other transition economies. Although the ownership of many enterprises has changed hands thanks to privatization, the industrial configuration established by administrative fiat and central planning during the Soviet era is still largely entrenched, and a new industrial sector in which competitive market forces determine corporate behavior has yet to emerge fully.

 

[jamahir]

--
fine. but topic is IMF so they mean business .. and if business terms will come...
yes jargon is used as showoff.. but there are few terminolgies which are necessary concept..
IMF is all about money. project, value .. returns .. so big data big system from excel to sap isneeded ..--

no, we must discard them all... the imf is not about development... it is a european version of "world bank", built for the express purpose of forwarding capitalism, which we must reject.

look at the state of kingfisher airlines... did vijay mallya's mba son with his mba language know that in 2011, the company will cease operating... did the company's middle-aged/elderly board of directors know, with all their so-called "years of experience"... why have not their mba degrees and corporate language been able to restart the airline... well, i knew in 2010 that such things about indian industry would happen... because i am socialist... i am not bragging, i really knew... not by magical predictions but through the common sense nature has given me a bit more than others.

they themselves use it.. so nothing new dear

and the american people are discarding these buzz words... that is why i put those two site names.

besides, look at where the occupy movement started... wall street, home of mba buzz-wording.

there should be a occupy china, occupy india, occupy pakistan, occupy everywhere.

Finance & Development, June 2001 - Competition and Business Entry in Russia
Competition and Business Entry in Russia
Harry G. Broadman


There remains considerable potential for abuse of market power, not only in Russia's infrastructure monopoly ("utility") sector (this potential is widely acknowledged, and the government's structural reform agenda includes policy initiatives designed to reduce it) but also in the manufacturing ("nonutility") sector. Many manufacturing firms are shielded from competition because of structural and institutional impediments, including significant seller and buyer concentration—"horizontal dominance"—in regional markets, a high degree of vertical integration and exclusive buyer-seller relationships in certain industrial sectors, geographic segmentation, interregional barriers to trade and investment, and policies that make entry difficult for new firms. These impediments are more pronounced in Russia than in other transition economies. Although the ownership of many enterprises has changed hands thanks to privatization, the industrial configuration established by administrative fiat and central planning during the Soviet era is still largely entrenched, and a new industrial sector in which competitive market forces determine corporate behavior has yet to emerge fully.

the blue highlight is mine... the usa government/establishment wanted a transition from what to what in russia??

a year before your given text, goldman sachs ( capitalist usa corporation ) created the "bric" concept... it was more a political concept than business... and rightly so, it has failed... i ask you to think of why.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

no, we must discard them all... the imf is not about development... it is a european version of "world bank", built for the express purpose of forwarding capitalism, which we must reject.

look at the state of kingfisher airlines... did vijay mallya's mba son with his mba language know that in 2011, the company will cease operating... did the company's middle-aged/elderly board of directors know, with all their so-called "years of experience"... why have not their mba degrees and corporate language been able to restart the airline... well, i knew in 2010 that such things about indian industry would happen... because i am socialist... i am not bragging, i really knew... not by magical predictions but through the common sense nature has given me a bit more than others.



and the american people are discarding these buzz words... that is why i put those two site names.

besides, look at where the occupy movement started... wall street, home of mba buzz-wording.

there should be a occupy china, occupy india, occupy pakistan, occupy everywhere.



the blue highlight is mine... the usa government/establishment wanted a transition from what to what in russia??

a year before your given text, goldman sachs ( capitalist usa corporation ) created the "bric" concept... it was more a political concept than business... and rightly so, it has failed... i ask you to think of why.

--
Dear ...you have right to have your views..
i presented my view with facts
i am not discussing role of IMF .. kingfisher.. MBA real value ..
i just simply replied horizontal and verticle concept nothing else..
--
Kingfisher
all know.. why it go down including mallya...
forget 2010 ...professonals predictd within few yras of its fondaton in 2003 that full carrier cant sustain market with exiting business model.. but he did not listen
if you have magical power to predict the same please write letter to RBI govnor as he predicted 2008 crisir beofre too
but he is IIT. PGDBM (MBA) - IIMA - PHd MIT..so he will be more jarganise person whihc you dont like
Raghuram Rajan warns of another global financial crisis - The Hindu
---
Socialist.
good .no system is perefct .. so india got mix system socialist - psu govt control over key industry and capitalisam .. free enterprise ... tata .. infossys.. birla .. reliance etc
--
occupy momet..
yes its satrated in wall street but ended on same street too
--
first you said US is abandoning jargon now you asking what you mean by USs traition economy.. whihc is jargon..concept.
--
what problem having political concept..
--
give me few g8 countires in 21st century with socialisam..
its contradictty argument with facts
--
every domain have there own langague .. from economy.. politcal.. social.. medical..
why people cant make life simper for children to remeber water as water and not as h20
think .. 2+2 is 4 than 2 sqaure is 4 ..

 

[Keel]

I agree with your message but the emoticon is trash. No Chinese man? Wtf?

hahaha because it was not intended to please the unfairandbiased

 

[pursuit of happiness]

the technicality of gdp/capita is not the right measure... if one must include money, then delivering economic welfare, justice, parity and comforts should have been the goal... totally a welfare society, like libyan jamahiriya.

what's the point of buying 125 western fighter planes when one's country has become "suicide capital of the world"??



true enough... i only disagree with your "faster economic development" part... economics has no future because money system must be eradicated and will be in any sensible near-future humanity.

---
partly you are right but problem is quantification of same
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) | Human Development Reports
Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gross National Happiness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gini coefficient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wolrld ackndolge that gdp is not right concept but best aviable till next somthing from above come in ro repalce

 

[tore]

India will never surpass China. Chinese are just too smart for Indians for them to beat China at anything.

Indians talk a lot and do very little. Chinese talk little and do a lot. It's a cultural trait which Indians will never ever overcome.

I hate to say this but South Asians are generally less intelligent than East Asians. East Asia is a far more developed region than South Asia.

-----------------------------------------

East Asia has traditionally been more political stabel region, but in Soth Asia Hindu's has been desperate to marginalize the muslim, sikh and christian population if the old India, that resulted in Bangladesh and Pakistan, and India still have 12 or more liberation movement active.

As a majority Indian hindues should build bridges and create harmony in the society.

Only then Indian & south asia have rapid development.

 

[nair]

Tired of listening to this.........

 

[Maravan]

Give us some break...

 

[Echo_419]

hahaha because it was not intended to please the unfairandbiased

You know what Chinese Posters need to give us a small break these Economy & Superpower threads are wearing us out
On topic
Ofcourse will will grow faster than China since we are starting the process of massive Industrialization & Chinese economy is undergoing Stabilization

 

[@nline]

After Obama visit Indian tottaly has gone mad!

 

[alpha q]

Ok ..then you must be an exception

Hahaha...