ICC asks Pakistan Cricket Board to pay 60 per cent of Indian board’s claimed cost in legal battle

[KAI KAI Baloch]

LOL just like Indian govt doesnt allow BCCI to play with Pakistan .... Tell them our Govt doesnt Allow us to Pay to BCCI....... Screw it

 

[joekrish]

ICC became a dictatorship where India has too much say from rigging matches, controlling umpires, to banning our best players. I say Pakistan should leave it.

Best option.

 

[maximuswarrior]

Best option.

You will get your wish. Only a matter of time. Fvck you and ICC. LOL at big three.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Best option.

Don’t quote me.

You will get your wish. Only a matter of time. Fvck you and ICC. LOL at big three.

We can play bilateral series against friendly countries.

I am sure others will join us when they realize the corruption of ICC.

 

[SunilM]

Best option.

Well, you should know better. All they want is to play with us.

 

[maximuswarrior]

Don’t quote me.



We can play bilateral series against friendly countries.

I am sure others will join us when they realize the corruption of ICC.

Exactly. Get out of this corrupt ICC gang. It is good for nothing. It is a corrupt gang of three big losers who think they can blackmail everyone else. They don't let the sport grow and think they own it. Let's do the right thing and simply show them a middle finger. We will play only with those nations that are not under their influence. Too bad the last time the big three were under pressure we didn't push through.

 

[hussain0216]

Well, you should know better. All they want is to play with us.

Its sport, thats the point

Sport should never be politicised

Its was worse enough with the english and Aussies trying to force everything through now we have indians with delusions of grandeur making a mockery of the sport

Fvck Pakistan, who wants to play with terrorist nation...

Its a sport you monkey worshipping blavk clown

You play your competition without allowing your wordly bitch hurt ruin the game

 

[SunilM]

Its sport, thats the point

Sport should never be politicised

Its was worse enough with the english and Aussies trying to force everything through now we have indians with delusions of grandeur making a mockery of the sport

With all due respect. You file a frivolous claim, Loose. Are told to pay legal costs. This is not about delusion of grandeaur. This is about misplaced priorities. When you were told India is not interested in playing with you for good reasons, you choose to file a frivolous complaint. Now suffer the costs of such a vilified action.

 

[aman_rai]

Its a sport you monkey worshipping blavk clown

You play your competition without allowing your wordly bitch hurt ruin the game

Ask your PCB for it...
Why do you go and file a case everywhere and complain after loosing.
If ICC is owned by us then why did you went there in first place

 

[hussain0216]

With all due respect. You file a frivolous claim, Loose. Are told to pay legal costs. This is not about delusion of grandeaur. This is about misplaced priorities. When you were told India is not interested in playing with you for good reasons, you choose to file a frivolous complaint. Now suffer the costs of such a vilified action.

The PCB is run by idiots, no one needs this to confirm that

But it was their own idiocy to trust india would play the sport without trying to politicize it

Once it was confirmed that world cricket has serious issues then there was no point in trying to go down this route

Now PCB should pay up and move on wiser and not let clowns like Najam Sethi make arrangements without contracts


Cricket has fallen a long way and risks increasing obscurity being this poorly run

Ask your PCB for it...
Why do you go and file a case everywhere and complain after loosing.
If ICC is owned by us then why did you went there in first place

The PCB assumed (wrongly) the ICC would act to protect the interests of the sport and resist politicizing the game

 

[SunilM]

Now PCB should pay up and move on wiser and not let clowns like Najam Sethi make arrangements without contracts

Touche.

 

[hussain0216]

Touche.

The problem with Najam Sethi and all bastards of his ilk is that they are liberals and they think everyone believes in the liberal shit they believe in

Its not that he is pro indian, just liberal..
Humanity blah blah
All friends blah blah
My indian friends and so on blah blah

The biggest response you can give is winning

ICC champions trophy THAT was a response

Attaining number 1 test rank not being able to play at home THAT was a response

Winning in England, SA or Aus is a response




This deluded shit hoping that everyone is here to safeguard a sport that is incredibly poorly run is ridiculous

 

[maithil]

PCB should file a case in SC and ask them to make Najam Sethi pay for this. This whole saga was his brainchild. He should pay for this.

 

[enquencher]

ICC asks Pakistan Cricket Board to pay 60 per cent of Indian board’s claimed cost in legal battle

The International Cricket Council (ICC) announced its costs award in the legal proceedings between the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). BCCI had won the legal battle against the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) over the issue of bilateral cricketing ties. The PCB had requested the ICC to look into the matter after India refused to play two bilateral series with the arch-rivals citing lack of governmental clearance.

The Dispute Panel has determined that the PCB should pay 60 per cent of: “(a) the [BCCI’s] Claimed Costs; and (b) the administrative costs and expenses of the panel which fall within the scope of paragraph 11.4 of the T/R (including, without limitation, the fees of the Tribunal members, and the costs and expenses they incurred in relation to this matter), the figure whereof is to be supplied to the PCB by the ICC.” On behalf of the dispute panel formed under the terms of reference of the ICC Disputes Resolutions Committee (DRC), the ICC had announced that the panel had dismissed the PCB’s claim against the BCCI. The judgement is binding and non-appealable.

The PCB had claimed losses of up to USD 70 million after two series weren’t played in November 2014 and December 2015. While the PCB tried to move the ball through talks, the BCCI made it clear that the government had the final say in this matter. PCB then sent a dispute notice to the Indian board in May and to the International Cricket Council in November.

ALSO READ: ICC dispute panel dismisses PCB’s case against Indian board

Speaking to Hindustan Times, BCCI treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry had said that the stance of the BCCI office bearers stood vindicated after the judgement and he was also quick to thank all those who deposed for the board in the matter.

“I am yet to read the decision but this should now put to rest all speculation regarding this matter and it vindicates the stand of the then office-bearers of the BCCI in this regard who were engaging with the other boards on the FTP at that point in time. The BCCI is grateful to all those who deposed for the board and to its legal team, specifically Raghu Raman, Sr. Advocate and Ian Mills, QC,” he had said.

As per claims by the Pakistan board, then BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel had signed the ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ between BCCI and PCB wherein the Indian and Pakistan cricket board had entered into an agreement that the two countries would play six series comprising at least two Tests, five ODIs and two T20Is between December 2015 and December 2023 with four of them being hosted by the PCB. The move never went forward as the BCCI cited lack of approval from the Indian government.

Also Read: BCCI CoA ‘happy’ after ICC rules against PCB in compensation case

Herbert Smith Freehills along with British lawyer QC Ian Mills fought India’s case while PCB was represented by Khwaja Ahmad Hosain, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan, Alexandros Panayides of Clifford Chance, London and Salman Nasser, PCB GM Legal Affairs. The ICC Disputes Panel was made up of three members — Michael Beloff QC, Jan Paulsson and Dr Annabelle Bennett.

Patel and former BCCI GM Ratnakar Shetty, who handled government relations on behalf of BCCI, were also cross-examined in the matter. ICC chairman Shashank Manohar, former BCCI chief, and Sundar Raman, former IPL COO, also turned up as witnesses. Interestingly, BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary has time and again made it clear that Patel’s communication was nothing but a ‘letter of intent’.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...egal-battle/story-1xmuR7a056WQ9CM2sX3GAP.html

Areeer yeh kya hua...pehle kapde utare..uske bad nange rehne ka fine bhi mara...

 

[SunilM]

The problem with Najam Sethi and all bastards of his ilk is that they are liberals and they think everyone believes in the liberal shit they believe in

Its not that he is pro indian, just liberal..
Humanity blah blah
All friends blah blah
My indian friends and so on blah blah

The biggest response you can give is winning

ICC champions trophy THAT was a response

Attaining number 1 test rank not being able to play at home THAT was a response

Winning in England, SA or Aus is a response




This deluded shit hoping that everyone is here to safeguard a sport that is incredibly poorly run is ridiculous

As you said. They need to pay up. Simple. The case filed by PCB had no merits. Was Dismissed.