Look at the post to which I replied.
Don't neet to, because it's your first post that provoked any replies! You purposely tried to derail the thread from topic and hiding behind some nice first words doesn't change that. Your real aim is pretty visible in your follow posts:
But this is Indian mentality therapy.
But since its Indians we are talking to
RACISM AND OTHER
No racist posts are allowed or other posts that are designed to put people down based on their nationality
FORUM RULES AND REGULATIONS
If you don't have something to contribute to the topic, why come up with pointless comments at all?
My bat on LCA MK 3 Like Gripen NG with 120 Kn engime and 7 ton weight lifting capability.
Gripen will use the GE 414G engine, with the same 98kN as LCA MK2 will have. The EPE engine with more thrust is offered by GE, but it requires more funds for development and has trade offs by reduced life and increased maintenance, which is why Saab will most like go for the already available version, unless a Gripen E/F customer requires the EPE.
Besides that, a speculated MK3 will only be another upgrade step of the LCA but by far not a stealth or NG fighter as DRDO tries to show it in the media. You can make some airframe shapings, but that makes it also less aerodynamic and LCA already has issues in that regard.
Not to mention that we first need to see what the MK2 will finally be look like and what final specs it will have. In fact, we don't even know what the weight difference today is between the LCA MK1 IAF version and the N-LCA MK1, which would be highly interesting to know, since that gives us an idea what the difference of MK2 IAF and MK IN might be.
Gripen E for example is now given with an empty weight of 8000Kg, which puts the Sea Gripen around 8500Kg and there are more modifciations for N-LCA need from LCA, than for the Sea Gripen from the Gripen E. Wonder if IN will go for N-LCA MK2 twin seater, if the emptyweight goes beyond 7000Kg?