acid rain
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,688
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
How so ??
The US controls one half of the muslim countries and Russia controls the other half.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so ??
Here is my scenario:It seems that the 'rivalry' between Russia and the West is making it's way back into the society. I don't expect any war to occur.
It is established that NATO is the aggressor in this situation. They're trying to encircle Russia and harm its security interests.
That being said, if future tensions occur with missile defense for example on Russia's border or more NATO deployments that lead to a situation where war is imminent...
How would it play out and will it be a sustained war or a quick conventional show of power/warning?
Good analysis.I think that in a conventional war between Russia and NATO,Nato has edge since European technology is better than that of Ruskies but Russian believes fielding technologically inferior weapons but more in numbers and numbers itself is a quality.
Due to war economy of both NATO and Russia will be severely damaged since NATO countries are democratic so there will public pressure on them to stop the war as soon as possible,no such problem exists for Russia.
If Russian airforce acts smartly it may be able to end the war with heavy losses on both sides.
Nuclear war is also possible depending upon what is at stake.
I think that in a conventional war between Russia and NATO,Nato has edge since European technology is better than that of Ruskies but Russian believes fielding technologically inferior weapons but more in numbers and numbers itself is a quality.
Due to war economy of both NATO and Russia will be severely damaged since NATO countries are democratic so there will public pressure on them to stop the war as soon as possible,no such problem exists for Russia.
If Russian airforce acts smartly it may be able to end the war with heavy losses on both sides.
Nuclear war is also possible depending upon what is at stake.
I would bet that NATO nations would come out on top in the end.Who benefits in the end? I should ask. In the end, what nation comes out at the top?
UK will send their sonsHow many parents in the US, Britain, France and Turkey would send their sons to die to defend Tallinn and Riga?
I think that in a conventional war between Russia and NATO,Nato has edge since European technology is better than that of Ruskies but Russian believes fielding technologically inferior weapons but more in numbers and numbers itself is a quality.
Due to war economy of both NATO and Russia will be severely damaged since NATO countries are democratic so there will public pressure on them to stop the war as soon as possible,no such problem exists for Russia.
If Russian airforce acts smartly it may be able to end the war with heavy losses on both sides.
Nuclear war is also possible depending upon what is at stake.
How many parents in the US, Britain, France and Turkey would send their sons to die to defend Tallinn and Riga?
Afghanistan is not Russia!Its an integrated military alliance. Such alliance systems require sacrifices on each member state. The UK will do its part, just as it did when it supported the American-led invasion and occupation in Iraq, Afghanistan, as well as operations in Libya. In fact, the greatest contributor of military support in any NATO engagement , aside from the United States, is the United Kingdom.
NATO seems to have edge at the moment but remember there is also a nuke factor.Secondly things could get complicated for NATO if nations like China join.Who benefits in the end? I should ask. In the end, what nation comes out at the top?
Here is my scenario:
Pew pew pew
Poof pooof poof
booom bababam
pewwww babababam
Something like that more or less.
NATO seems to have edge at the moment but remember there is also a nuke factor.Secondly things could get complicated for NATO if nations like China join.