How many members read the content of a thread???

[Levina]

This is frustrating....absolutely frustrating!!

My one year's experience on this forum tells me that most of the members here dont even read the content of a thread before posting in a thread.

There was a longgg thread comparing Erdogan and Modi's life recently. I happened to make the 2nd post in it and happened to say a line in the end " I hope Modi introduces UCC"...members who came after me on that thread had only one topic to talk about- UCC (secularism jibes too)while they completely forgot that the original topic of the thread was Erdogan-Modi comparison.

And then there was another thread called " Can a muslim be Indian?" in the senior's cafe, which had 11 pdf pages of a book posted by admin Horus. I can say that 99% of the ppl who came to that thread had not read the pdf pages at all .But the thread did not lack chest thumping members who went raucous after reading the title.ROFL

And now if free just go through the posts on this thread....
War of words intensifies on Taj Mahal, Yogi Adityanath claims it was built on Shiv temple
The mention of Taj mahal was enough for ppl to imagine that it was about to be destroyed by some hindu shibboleths. Btw the original article,the content of it I mean, doesnt even mention anything of that sort.
But our dear members 're always quick to jump into conclusions.

@WebMaster
I think there should be strict punishment for those who dont read the content of original post and randomly post on the threads.

(I'm sure many who would come to this thread would also not read the content..ahem )

 

[he-man]

This is frustrating....absolutely frustrating!!

My one year's experience on this forum tells me that most of the members here dont even read the content of a thread before posting in a thread.

There was a longgg thread comparing Erdogan and Modi's life recently. I happened to make the 2nd post in it and happened to say a line in the end " I hope Modi introduces UCC"...members who came after me on that thread had only one topic to talk about- UCC (secularism jibes too)while they completely forgot that the original topic of the thread was Erdogan-Modi comparison.

And then there was another thread called " Can a muslim be Indian?" in the senior's cafe, which had 11 pdf pages of a book posted by admin Horus. I can say that 99% of the ppl who came to that thread had not read the pdf pages at all .But the thread did not lack chest thumping members who went raucous after reading the title.ROFL

And now if free just go through the posts on this thread....
War of words intensifies on Taj Mahal, Yogi Adityanath claims it was built on Shiv temple
The mention of Taj mahal was enough for ppl to imagine that it was about to be destroyed by some hindu shibboleths. Btw the original article,the content of it I mean, doesnt even mention anything of that sort.
But our dear members 're always quick to jump into conclusions.

@WebMaster
I think there should be strict punishment for those who dont read the content of original post and randomly post on the threads.

(I'm sure many who would come to this thread would also not read the content..ahem )

I tried to introduce some sanity in taj mahal thread after both hindutva and jihadi forces were hell bent on breaking it down.

I failed badly and got 0 support.

 

[waleed3601]

I only read first page and last/second last page and reply accordingly. Seriously who has the time to read all the pages of replies if there's 10 or 15 of them??
(Also, I did read OP)

 

[he-man]

I only read first page and last/second last page and reply accordingly. Seriously who has the time to read all the pages of replies if there's 10 or 15 of them??
(Also, I did read OP)

I never expected zilch from musharraf in first place

 

[Levina]

I tried to introduce some sanity in taj mahal thread after both hindutva and jihadi forces were hell bent on breaking it down.

I failed badly and got 0 support.

I'm not surprised.This is not the first time.

This trend is definitely detrimental to the forum.

I only read first page and last/second last page and reply accordingly. Seriously who has the time to read all the pages of replies if there's 10 or 15 of them??
(Also, I did read OP)

dont worry I was talking only about the Original post or the post#1 of a thread.
And glad that you read the OP of this thread.

 

[he-man]

I'm not surprised.This is not the first time.

This trend is definitely detrimental to the forum.

Even @Horus wanted taj mahal dismantled,,check urself

 

[Levina]

Even @Horus wanted taj mahal dismantled,,check urself

Naa @Horus just said "let us demolish taj"...but those who posted after him had NO time to read the original post and assumed that his post was the summarized version of OP and ergo the trend on the thread.

 

[he-man]

Naa @Horus just said "let demolish taj"...but those who posted after him had NO time to read the original post and assumed that his post was the summarized version of OP and ergo the trend on the thread.

rofl:

I got hunted

 

[Levina]

rofl:

I got hunted

what?? did you get another negative??

 

[StormShadow]

This is frustrating....absolutely frustrating!!

My one year's experience on this forum tells me that most of the members here dont even read the content of a thread before posting in a thread.

There was a longgg thread comparing Erdogan and Modi's life recently. I happened to make the 2nd post in it and happened to say a line in the end " I hope Modi introduces UCC"...members who came after me on that thread had only one topic to talk about- UCC (secularism jibes too)while they completely forgot that the original topic of the thread was Erdogan-Modi comparison.

And then there was another thread called " Can a muslim be Indian?" in the senior's cafe, which had 11 pdf pages of a book posted by admin Horus. I can say that 99% of the ppl who came to that thread had not read the pdf pages at all .But the thread did not lack chest thumping members who went raucous after reading the title.ROFL

And now if free just go through the posts on this thread....
War of words intensifies on Taj Mahal, Yogi Adityanath claims it was built on Shiv temple
The mention of Taj mahal was enough for ppl to imagine that it was about to be destroyed by some hindu shibboleths. Btw the original article,the content of it I mean, doesnt even mention anything of that sort.
But our dear members 're always quick to jump into conclusions.


I think there should be strict punishment for those who dont read the content of original post and randomly post on the threads.

(I'm sure many who would come to this thread would also not read the content..ahem )

IAF should buy Rafale ASAP!!!

 

[Dubious]

I only read first page and last/second last page and reply accordingly. Seriously who has the time to read all the pages of replies if there's 10 or 15 of them??
(Also, I did read OP)

 

[farhan_9909]

I do

 

[Marshmallow]

we would rather watch a movie

 

[Levina]

we would rather watch a movie

oh baby!
glad to see you (trolling) after so many days


how 're you???

IAF should buy Rafale ASAP!!!

gobbledygook!!

Btw i heard Rafale has put France on tenterhooks. Lol

 

[Srinivas]

I only look for some interesting and challenging posts to reply !!