How China Will Track—and Kill—America’s Newest Stealth Jets

[Srinivas]

look at the white-whorship mentality of indians. By the way, PLA treat you indian with white equipment as dirt, have party at your soil anytime they want. Your brave soilders with west weapon should do something if you indians have a iota of self-respect. but I bet you don't otherwise you willnot be colonized over 1000 years.

Seriously dude !!

Did anyone bothering you?? you come here and vent your frustration

and Your name is pig taker !!

 

[AgentOrange]

Boasting about Chinese capabilities, fact is J31 is a sitting duck infront of any power which knows and uses F35.

Copying,pirating and building weapons worth 100 of Billions will lead to a mess, particularly if one uses the blue prints of the west which are supposed to be kept for chinese hackers.

Try Russian plasma stealth tech. if it exists for J31 !!

You're right. Nothing is more stealthy than India's indigenous stealth fighter program. It's so stealthy, it doesn't even exist yet! Jai Hind!

 

[Beidou2020]

You're right. Nothing is more stealthy than India's indigenous stealth fighter program. It's so stealthy, it doesn't even exist yet! Jai Hind!

 

[Basel]

Good luck...

Will it be possible for countries to develop detection capability against 5th gen planes?? and what tech you think is capable to evolve as 5th gen hunter?

 

[Oldman1]

Will it be possible for countries to develop detection capability against 5th gen planes?? and what tech you think is capable to evolve as 5th gen hunter?

As stated in this video at time index 6:00 when F-35 goes against other possible stealth aircraft.

 

[gambit]

Will it be possible for countries to develop detection capability against 5th gen planes?? and what tech you think is capable to evolve as 5th gen hunter?

For other countries ? Not at this time. For US ? Yes.

Let me put it this way...

Under radar bombardment, the rounded cube will have a lower RCS than the sharp edges cube. But because both cubes have the same foundation structure there are electronic similarities that cannot be erased. Masked, yes, but not done away.

What this mean is that we know what are the general RCS signatures of every major aircraft designs out there. That is designs, not specific models. If a fighter have canards, a design with canards will exhibit a unique RCS that contains canards as contributors to that radar signature, whether that signature is below a certain threshold or above it. In other words, we know how to defeat 'stealth'.

 

[SvenSvensonov]

For other countries ? Not at this time. For US ? Yes.

Let me put it this way...

View attachment 161326

Under radar bombardment, the rounded cube will have a lower RCS than the sharp edges cube. But because both cubes have the same foundation structure there are electronic similarities that cannot be erased. Masked, yes, but not done away.

What this mean is that we know what are the general RCS signatures of every major aircraft designs out there. That is designs, not specific models. If a fighter have canards, a design with canards will exhibit a unique RCS that contains canards as contributors to that radar signature, whether that signature is below a certain threshold or above it. In other words, we know how to defeat 'stealth'.

I've always thought the best way to end the "can the US detect stealth aircraft" debate was simply to say that we, the US, need to know where our systems are in space. Honestly, do people really think we let our aircraft go fight without knowing where they are or being able to see our own aircraft? Even some of our legacy systems such as the SPY-1 put out enough energy that they are not only jam proof, burning through jamming attempts, but they can easily detect stealth aircraft. The US learned how to defeat stealth a long time ago.

 

[Basel]

As stated in this video at time index 6:00 when F-35 goes against other possible stealth aircraft.

can't see the video (youtube is banned in Pakistan)