HariPrasad
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
1. You are correct, I made that assumption that you wanted laws. Su let me ask you what you want to do about the beef thing. If you say anything other than " tell people to not rest beef, but let them eat it if they want to" you are advocating violence.
We already have the laws in state against cow slaughter in more than 20 states of India. It is not violance. If you violate traffic law, you may be impression ed. this is not violance.
2. Imprisonment is violence, how can you be nonviolent but then imprison people?
Your English is too difficult to understand.
If you impression a person for killing somebody than it is a violence and it is violence by state against the violance of others. So it is a state sponsor violence against other violence. And there should be a lawlwss society.
4. I'm not the one saying we should be nonviolent, you are. If you actually believe in nonviolence then you cannot believe in laws since they are violence.
You have an utter confusion between violance and the punishment by law.