JOEY TRIBIANI
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2013
- Messages
- 3,344
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Double face
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course you did, is hard to defend ideas that are wrong
and 0.001% is less than 100% as well.. When you give comparison you compare numbers which are of the same base to given an understanding of the scale.Is 0.001% less than 1%?
Show me exactly where I was wrong!
You don't even understand basic math, I don't expect you to understand anything else I said.
Tell you what, you keep your flying monkeys and I'll keep the math. Deal?
You did not make even one argument against what I said. You went along like a dummy but then when you found out that I made you a fool you backtracked and cried.Do not expose your idiocy.
First of all you put a lots of your assumption in conversation which I had never quoted. I just accepted that for the sake of argument.
Second the punishment of crime is violence is also your hypothesis which I have not agreed to.
Thirdly we are discussion here whether animal slaughter should be done or not and not whether the there should be any punishment for violence or not and whether these punishment should be made or not?
So all of arguments are bluff and out of contest.
Got dang you are dumb.and 0.001% is less than 100% as well.. When you give comparison you compare numbers which are of the same base to given an understanding of the scale.
In percentage terms, if you claim it is less than 0.001% then you cannot say 1% as while doing that comparission you lose the scale that is 0.001% is 1000times smaller than 1%... It is called exaggeration . also i dont feel a need to verify these % from neutral source as Pakistanis are knows to manipulate anything to suit their needs. Your NADRA is not even aware of how many citizens are in Pakistan leave apart the historical figures of IVC.
More over topic is not about maths..still waiting for your response on IVC.. Your left the civilization which was covering almost 90% of your land mass...and India took it forward which was on 0.001% to 1% of its land mass....
So you agree you exaggerated numbers to prove your egoistic point, thou there was no need to do it.I made an exaggerated number to show my point. This is something you would have learned of you went to school.
That number doesn't matter, what matters is that very small percent of India contains the IVC.
Having said that, I know how retarded internet Hindu brains are. So let me ask you:
0.001% of India has IVC
less than 1% of India has IVC.
are those the statements contradictory?
Of course that are not, in spoken ENGLISH, I can say both without being contradictory.
Of course you are fixated on this tiny point because you have no leg to stand on.
And were didn't leave the IVC we were invaded by the Aryans who forced most of India to convert to Hinduism. We then left that oppressive religion for the more peaceful Buddhism, were then forced to convert back to Hinduism, until we finally got our freedom in Islam.
no comments....