Hindus Made Pakistan, Not Muslims, Says Son Of Allama Iqbal

[-blitzkrieg-]

British wanted partition, but it was the Muslim League who made it happen by collaborating with the British.

British didn't want a partition uptil August 1946.

Read my above post.

ML collaborated? Lol so what was congress doing going anarchist? Lol

 

[undercover JIX]

British didn't want a partition uptil August 1946.

Read my above post.

ML collaborated? Lol so what was congress doing going anarchist? Lol

Congress and RSS were happy under White man slavery, its in their DNA.

 

[Titanium100]

The Pakistan-India borderline divide was probably one of the most unique liberations ever gained by pen and paper. The Hindus put on the heist of the century and hard to not give them credit for this one.. The Hindus didn't create Pakistan but they expelled the northern ruling muslims of the subcontinent to the Lines of Mohammad of Ghor and Prithviraj Chauhan before the battle of Tarain..

They have rebooted the map back to 1192 AD that is exactly from 1947 - 755 years that is significiant and by that they gained by default lands the muslims had strong holds for nearly 800 years and bulit historical monuments in them for simply for free without firing a BULLET.. Unbelievable.

Cities like Agra, Delhi, Calcutta, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Allahabad, plenty of cities in Gujarati etc etc majority of the north was a strong hold including the deccan territories.

The Hindus knew once the british leave if Civil war was to occur the Muslims would have beaten them despite having more populations they were more organized hence they came up with this idea of getting back everything with the pen and paper which leads me to believe Jinnah was a patrioting Indian disquised as the father of Pakistan because he left many historical boundaries on the table and choose the Ghori-Chauhan which proves he was Sympathetic to the Indian struggles meaning he had emotional connections with them and supported them and felt Indian in every sense. He was more lenient towards his rajput heritage rather then anything else.. Jinnah is paraded as the hero of Pakistan but he was quite the opposite the enemy of Pakistan and muslims in the subcontinent but without a SHADOW OF doubt he was the hero of India and he felt Sympathetic towards India, felt india, cried in Indian, eat like an Indian, loved like an Indian there was no bone of Pakistan in his body.

 

[epebble]

The Pakistan-India borderline divide was probably one of the most unique liberations ever gained by pen and paper. The Hindus put on the heist of the century and hard to not give them credit for this one.. The Hindus didn't create Pakistan but they expelled the northern ruling muslims of the subcontinent to the Lines of Mohammad of Ghor and Prithviraj Chauhan before the battle of Tarain..

They have rebooted the map back to 1192 AD that is exactly from 1947 - 755 years that is significiant and by that they gained by default lands the muslims had strong holds for nearly 800 years and bulit historical monuments in them for simply for free without firing a BULLET.. Unbelievable.

Cities like Agra, Delhi, Calcutta, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Allahabad, plenty of cities in Gujarati etc etc majority of the north was a strong hold including the deccan territories.

The Hindus knew once the british leave if Civil war was to occur the Muslims would have beaten them despite having more populations they were more organized and warlike hence they came up with this idea of getting back everything without the pen and paper which leads me to believe Jinnah was a patrioting Indian disquised as the father of Pakistan because he left many historical boundaries on the table and choose the Ghori-Chauhan which proves he was Sympathetic to the Indian struggles meaning he had emotional connections with them and supported them and felt Indian in every sense

Are you saying the crafty Hindu Indian leaders chased away Muslims using gullible Jinnah? That rhymes with Professor Jalal's research.

 

[Rusty2]

I've actually said this many times. Pakistan exists due to Nehru's ego. He could not handle him having all the power so for him it was better to be in full control of a smaller subcontinent then to give up some of his powers.

 

[Hecig]

British didn't want a partition uptil August 1946.

Read my above post.

ML collaborated? Lol so what was congress doing going anarchist? Lol

LOL. British not only wanted but also IMPLIMENTED partition in 1905 with the partition of Bengal and with the active support of the Muslim League.

In October 1906 the Viceroy Lord Minto received the Simla Deputation consisting of Muslim leaders from all over India. They demanded separate electorates from the British and representation in excess of their population.

On 21st March 1907, the Government of India’s despatch gave four seats to the Muslims in the Viceroy’s Council. Two to be filled by nomination and the other two by election through separate electorates

The Muslim League, demanded ten electives seats, all to be filled by exclusive Muslim electorates, with no nominations.

This was followed up by separate electorate was introduced in Indian Councils Act 1909 Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom for Muslims and extended to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and Europeans by Government of India Act 1919.

This concession of separate electorates to Muslims by the British in 1909 is mentioned in almost every book of history written about that period.

Congress consistently and vehemently rejected the concession, but British found the ML more agreeable.


But all this stuff is Boring History, its so much easier to believe in your own Narrative.

 

[Titanium100]

Are you saying the crafty Hindu Indian leaders chased away Muslims using gullible Jinnah? That rhymes with Professor Jalal's research.

Exactly.. Hindus didn't create Pakistan but they used Jinnah to reboot things back to 1192 AD and lift the 755 years under Muslim rule in the lower subcontinent with just PEN AND PAPER..

Alot of people don't realize this but India haven't seen real independence for nearly 800 years until 1947 AD and Jinnah was the mastermind. No Muslim would have handed Delhi, Agra or atleast parts or the north like Gujrat, Punjab, Rajsthan etc etc

 

[epebble]

Exactly.. Hindus didn't create Pakistan but they used Jinnah to reboot things back to 1192 AD and lift the 755 years under Muslim rule in the lower subcontinent with just PEN AND PAPER..

Alot of people don't realize this but India haven't seen real independence for nearly 800 years until 1947 AD and Jinnah was the mastermind. No Muslim would have handed Delhi, Agra of atleast parts of the north like Gujrat, Punjab, Rajsthan etc etc

But what is the meaning of 'Handed' when Indians decided they will become a republic? Parliament became sovereign and they dissolved all princely states.

 

[Titanium100]

But what is the meaning of 'Handed' when Indians decided they will become a republic? Parliament became sovereign and they dissolved all princely states.

No the muslims refused to be part of their republic and things was heading towards a major azz war but people like Jinnah hijacked it hence we liberated India with this Ghori-Chauhan boundary lines

 

[epebble]

No the muslims refused to be part of their republic and things was heading towards a major azz war but people like Jinnah hijacked it hence we liberated India with this Ghori-Chauhan boundary lines

War between whom? There was only one government all the time. British Indian and then Indian and then Republic of India. But for partition, there was fairly little violence. Much less than that in American Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution or Cultural Revolution of China or French Revolution.

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

Jinnah never wanted the partition.

Jinnah only asked reserved seats for the Muslims.

Hindu fascists like Gandhi and Nehru forced the partition by not agreeing to this just and fair proposal.

 

[Titanium100]

War between whom? There was only one government all the time. British Indian and then Indian and then Republic of India. But for partition, there was fairly little violence. Much less than that in American Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution or Cultural Revolution of China or French Revolution.

Yes there was no war but war was looming but with the partition it was avoided

 

[Abdul Rehman Majeed]

The Pakistan-India borderline divide was probably one of the most unique liberations ever gained by pen and paper. The Hindus put on the heist of the century and hard to not give them credit for this one.. The Hindus didn't create Pakistan but they expelled the northern ruling muslims of the subcontinent to the Lines of Mohammad of Ghor and Prithviraj Chauhan before the battle of Tarain..

They have rebooted the map back to 1192 AD that is exactly from 1947 - 755 years that is significiant and by that they gained by default lands the muslims had strong holds for nearly 800 years and bulit historical monuments in them for simply for free without firing a BULLET.. Unbelievable.

Cities like Agra, Delhi, Calcutta, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Allahabad, plenty of cities in Gujarati etc etc majority of the north was a strong hold including the deccan territories.

The Hindus knew once the british leave if Civil war was to occur the Muslims would have beaten them despite having more populations they were more organized hence they came up with this idea of getting back everything with the pen and paper which leads me to believe Jinnah was a patrioting Indian disquised as the father of Pakistan because he left many historical boundaries on the table and choose the Ghori-Chauhan which proves he was Sympathetic to the Indian struggles meaning he had emotional connections with them and supported them and felt Indian in every sense. He was more lenient towards his rajput heritage rather then anything else.. Jinnah is paraded as the hero of Pakistan but he was quite the opposite the enemy of Pakistan and muslims in the subcontinent but without a SHADOW OF doubt he was the hero of India and he felt Sympathetic towards India, felt india, cried in Indian, eat like an Indian, loved like an Indian there was no bone of Pakistan in his body.

In undivided British Raj, today Muslims would have been 50% and within few decades we could have touched over 75-80%.

Partition was a great blunder of the British and an unfair deal for the Muslims of the subcontinent.

 

[truthseeker2010]

the chaos of 1946 and nehrus attitude after direct action plan gave us Pakistan..uptil 1940 when the shape of confederation couldn't be agreed upon, the thought of a separate state also became an option.. britishers /mount batten (your first governor General) had no mood for division till 1946..it was just a matter of months riots happened things turned around..Jinnah wanted a confederation with weak center unlike nehru so even if jinnahs confederation would have formed the unity of india wouldn't have lasted long as the Muslim hindu riots would have devastated the region. And we saw a prime example of that in form of how Indian state went to war and killed 125000 Hyderabad state soldiers and innocent civilians to usurp it.
The eventual results of jinnahs efforts was a soverign pakistan either way.

That confederation still exist with the name of India.

 

[epebble]

In undivided British Raj, today Muslims would have been 50% and within few decades we could have touched over 75-80%.

Partition was a great blunder of the British and an unfair deal for the Muslims of the subcontinent.

So, do you think Jinnah was a fool or traitor?