What's new

Hindu rioters burn 3 Muslims to death in Patna, Bihar

lol Jinnah was more secular then the most secular person of your supa powa india.

It is not one's personality, rather one's action which counts.

His actions were directly responsible for widening rift between Muslims and other communities of British India.

Despite being secular personally, He used communal politics to further his political agenda which culminated in deaths of millions of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs.
 
.
Bhai, if he was secular then what was the need for creation of a nation based on Islam. If he was secular then he wouldn't have given call for Direct action day to kill Hindus..

Anyways, he is not the topic of this thread so lets give him the rest. I just wish that all the rioters involved as well as the ones involved in killing of the lover boy should be punished appropriately by the law of the land. No one should be allowed to take law in their hand.
well off course he didn't want us muslims to live under hindu domination who would torch us whenever they feel like.

It is not one's personality, rather one's action which counts.

His actions were directly responsible for widening rift between Muslims and other communities of British India.

Despite being secular personally, He used communal politics to further his political agenda which culminated in deaths of millions of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs.
its been more then 60 years since india got independence yet things like gujrat incidents are a frequent case, still blame jinnah for it??
 
.
You fail to understand my reply. Do you consider that Gandhi and Nehru can be credited with influencing the anti-Muslim riots and massacres of Muslims in India ?
No.. Because it was Jinnah who instigated those feelings in the first place to gain relevance in the post independence scenario.
 
.
well off course he didn't want us muslims to live under hindu domination who would torch us whenever they feel like.

well off course he didn't want us muslims to live under hindu domination who would torch us whenever they feel like.


its been more then 60 years since india got independence yet things like gujrat incidents are a frequent case, still blame jinnah for it??

Muslims blowing up each other.. rather than "Hindus burning Muslims" is a more preferable outcome?

When India gained independence, and adopted a secular constitution, we knew there would be problems along the way, as we are such vast diverse country, encompassing people of so many faiths.

Where as Pakistan achieved near homogeneity, with almost entire population being Muslims, So why aren't you at peace?
You couldn't even coexist with your Bengali brethren, who were of same religion as you, just different ethnicity.

Hatred begets hatred, when you teach your people hate a community (in this case 'Hindus') because they different from 'you'. The cycle of violence will continue even when Hindus are no longer in picture.
You would want to kill anyone, who is even slightly different from you.
 
. .
Muslims blowing up each other.. rather than "Hindus burning Muslims" is a more preferable outcome?

When India gained independence, and adopted a secular constitution, we knew there would be problems along the way, as we are such vast diverse country, encompassing people of so many faiths.

Where as Pakistan achieved near homogeneity, with almost entire population being Muslims, So why aren't you at peace?
You couldn't even coexist with your Bengali brethren, who were of same religion as you, just different ethnicity.

Hatred begets hatred, when you teach your people hate a community (in this case 'Hindus') because they different from 'you'. The cycle of violence will continue even when Hindus are no longer in picture.
You would want to kill anyone, who is even slightly different from you.

well lets just say we don't like to be ruled by Hindus. ;) whatever we do to each others that become our internal issue lol.

Lol, that's the reason why he wanted a new country for muslims.
would you want to be ruled by Muslims?? would you???
 
.
They are not Hindus. Hindus do not kill other people. Hinduism is against violence.
 
.
They are not Hindus. Hindus do not kill other people. Hinduism is against violence.
I-SEE-WHAT-YOU-DID-THERE_HOLYSHIT.jpg
 
.
well lets just say we don't like to be ruled by Hindus. ;) whatever we do to each others that become our internal issue lol.


would you want to be ruled by Muslims?? would you???

Lets stick to the topic. Though Jinnah being secular is a laugh. Thanks for the morning chuckle.
 
.
And nobody's concerned who started the trouble, one Hindu boy was killed by Muslims first. This is a typical case, first provoke, then play victim. Same applies to Gujrat riots, what was the root cause?
 
.
And nobody's concerned who started the trouble, one Hindu boy was killed by Muslims first. This is a typical case, first provoke, then play victim. Same applies to Gujrat riots, what was the root cause?
Dude.. This is PAKISTAN defence forum. What do you expect ? But the world does not run as per their flights of fancy. so chill..
 
.
Turning a personal fued in to a religious riot. Typical sub continent scum.
 
.
Lets stick to the topic. Though Jinnah being secular is a laugh. Thanks for the morning chuckle.
i am not discussing girls periods what i said was very relevant to the topic. surely can say you dint want to answer that question.

the topic wasn't if jinnah was a secular or not the topic was that "3 muslims were burnt to death".

They are not Hindus. Hindus do not kill other people. Hinduism is against violence.
:haha:
 
.
would you want to be ruled by Muslims?? would you???
Going by the track record of their achievements , NO. Christians and Jews are OK. Unless they dont force me to convert.
 
.
well lets just say we don't like to be ruled by Hindus. ;) whatever we do to each others that become our internal issue lol.

If you are a bigot yourself, then you really should not be shedding crocodile tears for the people killed here..after all this our internal matter!!
would you want to be ruled by Muslims?? would you???

If Muslims were in majority then they would have ruled, that is how democracy works.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom