What's new

Happy Independence Day!

. . . . .
It's because of him that BD got independence.

They forget Tajuddin Ahmad? Ziaur Rahman? Bhashani? Did they not fight for that one purpose?

All currency notes have Mujib's face on them because it was only because of him that Bangladesh achieved independence?
 
.
All currency notes have Mujib's face on them because it was only because of him that Bangladesh achieved independence?
Indians get their Bangladesh history lessons from Hasina League.
 
.
I mean, how would you feel if Congress put Gandhi's face in all INR notes because it was supposedly only him that gave India independence? Coupled with a cult personality? Is it the way of Democracy? @OrionHunter

Indians get their Bangladesh history lessons from Hasina League.

No, not really. Hasina is all but a termite to them. Slowly, but surely she'll come to that understanding.

Where they get their lessons from is pretty scary.
'Not a Single Neighbour That India Doesn't Have a Problem With': National Security Advisor Ajit Dova

1.28 billion souls and the generations to come all out chasing the American Dream.
 
.
I mean, how would you feel if Congress put Gandhi's face in all INR notes because it was supposedly only him that gave India independence? Coupled with a cult personality? Is it the way of Democracy? @OrionHunter



No, not really. Hasina is all but a termite to them. Slowly, but surely she'll come to that understanding.

Where they get their lessons from is pretty scary.
'Not a Single Neighbour That India Doesn't Have a Problem With': National Security Advisor Ajit Dova

1.28 billion souls and the generations to come all out chasing the American Dream.
Bangladesh putting Sheikh Mujib's face on currency is the same as any of the three subcontinental countries putting Mir Zafar's face on the currencies.
Look, you along with @Khalid Newazi are relatively new here. And I have discussed the matter of 1971 way back in other threads. And I can simply say that the way you describe my view on the matter is completely wrong.
okay fair enough. you are not as BAL-ish as bongbang is. and as i said before, i sometimes really agree with some of your take on certain things. but i also understand how you've come to start a thread like this because i've been there myself. it has to do with the pervasive political environment in BD that includes calling the Indian invasion as "independence" and other things that makes you to force yourselves to be ignorant.

is there issue of self-esteem? as a result do we as a people (many of us) choose a completely false narrative of being "victorious" rather than the fact that we completely lost our precious sovereignty in 1971? do we like to pretend we were not colonized by India (in a very bad way) in 1971, because we hate India so much, and so we are not comfortable giving India that credit?
No, not really. Hasina is all but a termite to them. Slowly, but surely she'll come to that understanding.
yes Hasina is a termite to the far-leftists of BD. these militant-intellectual far-leftists are the Sultana-Sufia Kamal, Kudrat e Khuda and Shib Narayan Das types and similar figures. Hasina is an ambassador or a servant carrying out the wishes of that group, just as her father was.
 
.
They forget Tajuddin Ahmad? Ziaur Rahman? Bhashani? Did they not fight for that one purpose?

All currency notes have Mujib's face on them because it was only because of him that Bangladesh achieved independence?
Well, they had to select someone. It's not possible to print everyone's face on a currency note. And he was the first PM of BD, not Tajuddin Ahmad or Ziaur Rahman or Bhashani!
 
.
okay fair enough. you are not as BAL-ish as bongbang

You sure. Im a Balish?

image_38_6308.jpg
 
. .
The notion of Bangladesh is a failed one, Hasina has already given BD to her Indian masters. Add to that, a shit national anthem by a hindu and a pagan name for a country. The whole identity of 'Bangladesh' needs to be rethought.

thanks Dhakai Thaki for showing what aazidane was talking about. this is not our country, this is Rabindranath's slave country
 
.
Well, they had to select someone. It's not possible to print everyone's face on a currency note. And he was the first PM of BD, not Tajuddin Ahmad or Ziaur Rahman or Bhashani!

Mujib was the country's first president, whereas Tajuddin was its first prime minister :D
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom