What's new

Growing intolerance? What a bunch of old frauds these ‘intellectuals’ have proved to be

Namo is the Zia ul Haq of Pakistan.
Booming economy, social degradation, artists and entertainment industry in the line of fire, boycotts, polarization of society into liberals and conservatives, increasing intolerance etc etc
I mean if this isn't what Pakistan was in the 80s then what is?
good for us, India is undoing itself. they did not bother to learn from our mistakes.

Think what you want

In more than 40 years in journalism, never have I seen such an explosion of free speech in India. The Prime Minister has been called a fascist, he has been charged with being complicit in the murder of Mohammad Akhlaq, he has been reviled by his political opponents and each word said has been given full and faithful coverage in the media. Only last week I was at a gathering in Mumbai where Raj Thackeray mocked him for travelling so often abroad that a sequel to Bajrangi Bhaijaan was being planned, for Salman Khan to bring him back to India. This was reported in the newspapers without anyone caring to mention the new directions in foreign policy. Or Narendra Modi’s efforts to revive foreign investment in the moribund economy he inherited.

Yet the writers, historians, filmmakers, artistes and scientists who have joined the award-returning protest say that they are protesting because they believe that freedom of expression is under threat. What a bunch of old frauds these ‘intellectuals’ have proved to be. Even as someone who predicted long before Narendra Modi became prime minister that something like this would happen, the extent of the fraudulence has surprised me. Not one of the men and women who have joined the protest have given a single example of books being banned or films being stopped, and yet they have whipped up such hysteria in the media that in the eyes of the world, India is today as awful a country as Iran.


Speaking of Iran, did you hear one of our conscientious intellectuals raise their voices for the poets Fatemeh Ekhtesari and Mehdi Mousavi who have been sentenced to receiving 99 lashes each for shaking hands with people of the opposite sex? No, you would not have. The Indian intellectual is a creature of selective outrage, so we did not hear voices raised either when Professor T J Joseph’s hand was chopped off by jihadists of Kerala’s Popular Front of India. He offended this Islamist military outfit because in their dreadful version of Islam, he had blasphemed their Prophet. Professor Joseph’s Islamic punishment did not make national headlines and was quickly forgotten because we in the media are as proudly ‘liberal’ as the award-returning intellectuals. So when was the last time you read a serious article on the ethnic cleansing of Pandits from the Kashmir valley?


The truth is that us ‘liberal’ types are really the most illiberal people you will ever meet. We cannot accept a narrative that differs from the narrative that we believe is the right one and Narendra Modi in our narrative has always been a villain.
And must remain a villain even if this means turning democracy on its head. If a recent Pew poll reveals that Modi still has an 87 per cent approval rating, then the pollsters must be fascists or the people must be wrong. It might interest you to know that many of the protesting writers, filmmakers and historians have opposed Modi long before he became prime minister. Some openly campaigned against him during the 2014 general election and cannot accept that the people chose to give him a full mandate. Many lurked about in the corridors of fine hotels in Banaras hoping to influence voters to reject Modi and embrace Arvind Kejriwal.

As someone who was also lurking about in the corridors of fine hotels in Banaras, I ran into some of these ‘intellectuals’ and tried explaining that in their ivory tower they were missing the mood of the people. Nobody listened. They did not want to because their purpose was clear. It was to convince foreign correspondents of their view, and they succeeded brilliantly. So most influential foreign newspapers reduced the story of the most remarkable general election India has seen in decades to a dull tale of imaginary Hindu-Muslim tensions.

It was as if along with our intellectuals they were waiting for something like the murder of Mohammad Akhlaq to happen. When it did, the foreign press used it to once more paint India as a country that was really not much better than the Islamic republic next door.

So totally have the protesting intellectuals occupied the public square in recent weeks that not even General Pervez Musharraf admitting that Hafiz Saeed and Osama bin Laden were Pakistani heroes got the attention it should have. They will continue to dominate the public square till the elections in Bihar are over in the forlorn hope of changing the mind of voters. Then they will disappear into obscurity till the next important election happens when they will undoubtedly find some new issue to make a racket about. The sad truth is that our public intellectuals have always acted as a fifth column of the Congress party for reasons of ‘secularism’, and this is now more obvious than it has ever been.

- See more at: Growing intolerance? What a bunch of old frauds these ‘intellectuals’ have proved to be | The Indian Express

@jamahir,
@ranjeet
@magudi
@Josef K

Open war needs to be declared against these people
 
.
Tavleen Singh has little credibility, too close to BJP, a consistent right wing journalist(if you can call her journalist).
Watch her on any program on youtube.
Here is one cringeworthy interview.

 
.
Tavleen Singh has little credibility, too close to BJP, a consistent right wing journalist(if you can call her journalist).
Watch her on any program on youtube.
Here is one cringeworthy interview.

Attack the message not the messenger.

I have watched this video before and did not find anything alarming in it. She is of right wing persuasion....so ? ....or are we now so intolerant that only commies get to opine in India anymore?
 
.
Attack the message not the messenger.

I have watched this video before and did not find anything alarming in it. She is of right wing persuasion....so ? ....or are we now so intolerant that only commies get to opine in India anymore?
I am not against her voicing opinion, just pointing out that she is a chaddi journalist, and everybody probably will look commie to her. Its not like she is an independent free thinker or even journalist of any reputation.(my opinion of course)
 
.
Namo is the Zia ul Haq of Pakistan.
Booming economy, social degradation, artists and entertainment industry in the line of fire, boycotts, polarization of society into liberals and conservatives, increasing intolerance etc etc
I mean if this isn't what Pakistan was in the 80s then what is?
good for us, India is undoing itself. they did not bother to learn from our mistakes.
Are you serious?? You are comparing General Zia a military dictator's legacy to a Prime Minister who has been elected in an general election where more than 540 million people voted.
 
.
There is no Religious Intolerance in India and 1000 people will not determine it for 1.3 billion people .

you want 400 million to dictate for the remaining 900 million??

or 800 million to dictate for the remaining 500 million??

or the reactionaries, their apologists and the fence-sitting cowards to silence the progressives??

to a Prime Minister who has been elected in an general election where more than 540 million people voted.

read above reply and also my first post on page 1.
 
Last edited:
.
I am not against her voicing opinion, just pointing out that she is a chaddi journalist, and everybody probably will look commie to her. Its not like she is an independent free thinker or even journalist of any reputation.(my opinion of course)
Please read her other columns first before you judge and sentence her in such a facile way. Time and time again she has come out against conservative views on social matters. She berates those who go around trying to disallow women from drinking, or eating what they want. She herself is in a long term live-in-partnership, that is how socially conservative she is. Time and time again she has written articles critical of the current government.

Forgive me for being blunt, but the problem with you bleeding heart liberals is that you simply cannot see nuance or shades in other opinions or views. If Tavleen Singh believes that Modi has been unfairly targeted in this writers award campaign then of course she must also believe in caste, dowry, female subservience, she is a chaddi, an unthinking uneducated animal filled with visceral hatred and superstitions.

Please disabuse yourself of that notion, right wing comes in shades as does left wing. There are plenty of socially liberal, fiscally conservative voters in India. Tavleen Singh believes that socialism has kept India in poverty. She is Sikh herself with a Half muslim son who had a Christian fiancé. She is not against anyone's religion. Read her articles on the problems of villages in India, she is one of the few journalist who actually visit remote corners of India unlike the lefty Lutyens brigade. She is one of the few journalists who takes the trouble to collect data from primary sources.
 
.
Tavleen Singh has little credibility, too close to BJP, a consistent right wing journalist(if you can call her journalist).
Watch her on any program on youtube.
Here is one cringeworthy interview.


You are behaving exactly like how right wingers generally behave these days. Before any counter argument, paste a motive. Yes she might be very close to BJP, but it is better to post a counter argument than pointing out her close allegiance to BJP. What she is saying is always more important than who she is.
 
.
Narendra dabholkars murder undre congress rule was ok because

1 he was a balanced activists who actually fought against superstition and not just vilified hinduism while carefully staying away from other secular religions

2 he was killed under congress rule, that made it a secular crime

3 narendra dabholkar shared his first name with modi
 
.
read above reply and also my first post on page 1.
So the people voted for other parties too and they have their representatives in the lower house and those who doesn't well their choices have been overlooked by the majority of votes, but comparing Modi who faces a healthy opposition and a tons of intellectuals who are criticizing him on a daily basis now to a military dictator who had no opposition at all isn't quite fair.
And now I am off to sleep and will ans you tomorrow so 'nighty night'.
 
. .
this tavleen singh crackpot female, does she ( having had a affair with the pakistani muslim, salman taseer ) run away when her fellow sanghis release terror statements against "love jihad" and how all "dharmics" must protect their sister and cousin from the evil miyans??

is she another of those socialites ( not socialists - for some members ) who attends parties attended by all the fakers and suwwars more concerned about how some female is not 40 kg weight ( oh, dahling, the scandal !! ) rather than indulge in the "boring and anti-national" commie talk of how in maharashtra, foeticided female "biological remains" ( dead bodies ) are being fed to "man's best friend" dogs??
 
Last edited:
.
you want 400 million to dictate for the remaining 900 million??

or 800 million to dictate for the remaining 500 million??

or the reactionaries, their apologists and the fence-sitting cowards to silence the progressives??


Are you advocating for a totalitarian regime imposed by communist 'progressives'? Because that is the only conclusion I can draw from your words that oppose democracy.
 
.
Are you advocating for a totalitarian regime imposed by communist 'progressives'? Because that is the only conclusion I can draw from your words that oppose democracy.

i have always advocated for a direct-democracy ( true democracy ) where there are no parties ( because divide people ) and where the people can decide on neighborhood issues, country issues and global issues by gathering into neighborhood-level congresses and having their secretariats deliver enlightened ideas and decisions to the city-level secretariat and country-level secretariat.

such a system can only be brought through revolutionary change arranged by progressives/socialists/true-intellectuals.

one movement that has a similar idea is "aam aadmi party" with its "swaraj" ideal.
 
Last edited:
.
dear sanghis, stop using "prime minister" to instill fear into progressives - fear of being charged with "sedition" and all such british-era anti-human laws.

remember the years when you would insult manmohan singh every day?? you didn't have respect for the prime minister's post then??

Young Indians have learnt , what really President and Prime Minister of Republic of India means .

I dont think that there would be no repeat of such things .



i must remind of the time the film "haider" was being released and all sanghis and apologists were calling for the cast and crew of that film to be tried for treason, sedition and what not.

there was such one pdf thread which turned quite saffron indeed during those days.

That movie Haider , did showed one reality how our nation was fighting against the proxy war in the 90's because of the cold war tactics.



when was the last time a sanghi presented the solution to kashmir??

There is no problem in Kashmir and militancy have been crushed , Government is implementing development projects and uplifting lifes of Jammu and Kashmir people.


The CMD, State Bank of Hyderabad, Shri Santanu Mukherjee presenting a cheque to the Union Minister for Finance, Corporate Affairs and Information & Broadcasting, Shri Arun Jaitley, for the J&K Relief Fund, in New Delhi on November 02, 2015.
s2015110272720.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom