What's new

Global Hunger Index: Bangladesh condition 'serious' but better than India, Pakistan

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
16,515
Reaction score
-4
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Global Hunger Index: Bangladesh condition 'serious' but better than India, Pakistan
Syed Ali Asfar | October 12, 2017 19:48:56

Bangladesh has been ranked 88th out of 119 countries on the Global Hunger Index this year.

The report was released by Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

The GHI, now in its 12th year, ranks countries based on four key indicators: undernourishment, child mortality, child wasting and child stunting, according to the GHI published in www.ifpri.org and reports by some agencies.

The 2017 report ranked 119 countries in the developing world, nearly half of which have “extremely alarming”, “alarming” or “serious” hunger levels.

The report states that Bangladesh hunger problem is under 'serious' condition with score 26.4.

A GHI score of 9.9 or lower denotes low hunger; while scores between 35.0 and 49.9 denote 'alarming' hunger, and a score of 20-34.9 means ‘serious’ problem of hunger.

According to the report, Bangladesh rank at 2017 GHI is worse than its neighbours, Nepal (72), Myanmar (77), Sri Lanka (84) and China (29).

However, Indian and Pakistan ranked even below Bangladesh and held 100th and 106th spots respectively.

Afghanistan has been ranked 107th position.

Though being under several international conflicts, North Korea (93) and Iraq (78) ranked much better Bangladesh in the hunger parameter.

India has been ranked third-worst in Asia, who only fared better than Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It further stated that India's poor performance is one of the main reasons pushing the South Asia region to the worst performing category on the GHI scale this year.

The war-torn Central African Republic is the worst affected, followed by Chad, Sierra Leone, Madagascar and Zambia.

The GHI score is based on four indicators - proportion of undernourished in the population, prevalence of child mortality, child stunting, and child wasting.

IFPRI in its report said the 2017 Global Hunger Index (GHI) shows long-term progress in reducing hunger in the world.

The advances have been uneven, however, with millions of people still experiencing chronic hunger and many places suffering acute food crises and even famine.

According to 2017 GHI scores, the level of hunger in the world has decreased by 27 per cent from the 2000 level.

Of the 119 countries assessed in this year’s report, one falls in the extremely alarming range on the GHI Severity Scale; seven fall in the alarming range; 44 in the serious range; and 24 in the moderate range.

Only 43 countries have scores in the low range.

In addition, 9 of the 13 countries that lack sufficient data for calculating 2017 GHI score -including Somalia, South Sudan, and Syria- raise significant concern, and in fact may have some of the highest levels of hunger.

The 27 per cent improvement noted above reflects progress in each of these indicators according to the latest data from 2012–2016 for countries in the GHI.
 
. .
The report states that Bangladesh hunger problem is under 'serious' condition with score 26.4.

A GHI score of 9.9 or lower denotes low hunger; while scores between 35.0 and 49.9 denote 'alarming' hunger, and a score of 20-34.9 means ‘serious’ problem of hunger.

According to the report, Bangladesh rank at 2017 GHI is worse than its neighbours, Nepal (72), Myanmar (77), Sri Lanka (84) and China (29).

However, Indian and Pakistan ranked even below Bangladesh and held 100th and 106th spots respectively.

Afghanistan has been ranked 107th position.
This year BD has already purchased and is still purchasing staple food from Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Myanmar and Russia. Even with importing of so many million tons of foodstuff, BD hunger index remains quite low comparing to our cousins in our west. People here will agree that it is a great achievement.
 
.
.
I'm surprised at Sri Lanka is ranked 84, worse than MM, Nepal, the Sri Lanka's normal GDP Per Capita is near $ 4000, 3x of MM, 5x of Nepal. Sri Lanka has a population of only 21 million, the least among the three nations.
 
.
Headline is bullshit.Why it has to compare with India or Pakistan? This type of comparison obsession in all cases is not good.If Bangladesh had lower score than India or Pakistan, then headline could have done by saying 'condition serious,worse than India and Pakistan'.Because, that would have been good to set a target.But once you have overtaken them, no need to brag about it.Just state the position of each countries as a neutral assessment in article.If one need to compare in anyway then correct headline would have been 'condition serious,worse than Nepal, Sri Lanka and Myanmar'

Sometimes, journalist also need some common courtesy lesson.
 
.
bangladesh is surely developing steadily with no glitches . they don't have to deal with any military shit or border tensions (other than recent rohingya) . that helps i guess ? not taking anything away from them though . Their economy is the most consistent one in south asia
 
.
This a "rubbish source". As bad as me, @PAKISTANFOREVER , @Chinese-Dragon @Mangus Ortus Novem set up a "Asian Nutrition Policy Institute" or ANPI and then drum up some figures. You know what figures you would get for India. Bangladesh? Don't even ask !




Very dear Pak,

Beat up data long enough and it will dance on your table!

There is, of course, direct relationship between calorie intake and mental/physical performance. However, it is also the quality of calories... I know you understand what I intend here.

Pak is in South West Asia so any comparison with countries in South Asia is not helpful really. Also, historically Pak has been breadbasket of Asia...just look at 60s and 70s era Pak...before certain religious socialism nationalised your booming idustries and banks.

ANPI should/must only focus on South Asia or/AF. Rest of Asia has truly come out with resounding colours.

Paks should indeed keep focusing on more animal protiens and fats...good for brain development. However, I fear Paks have it too good and put on too much weight...looking at the pictures of your politicos.

The best index should be to see which country has more fat/overweight politicos in the region.

Next week its going to warmer here. How about your end? Hot for Oct...not that anyone is complaining.

You keep digging!


Mangus
 
.
Country with less population doing better. Only exception is China yes its due to their economic success.
 
.
@Śakra @Nilgiri now this isn't some stats created by bd "corrupt" govt... some international shit. Your comments.

Uh yes it is. GHI data (IFPRI basically just does a composite index) comes from FAO which takes its data from the govt surveying (NFHS for India, some BBS organ for BD I would imagine...and all the higher corruption and lower credibility of the latter compared to former) of the respective countries.

Please do a modicum of reading first before you spout. Thanks.

Its quite telling btw that BD records a massive wasting problem among its children but claims 100% ODF. Something definitely doesnt add up there given the state by state trends on the issue in India.

This a "rubbish source". As bad as me, @PAKISTANFOREVER , @Chinese-Dragon @Mangus Ortus Novem set up a "Asian Nutrition Policy Institute" or ANPI and then drum up some figures. You know what figures you would get for India. Bangladesh? Don't even ask !

The data comes from the original countries statistic gathering organisation. GHI simply makes its own composite index using this (through FAO) of what it thinks are the most important factors regarding hunger.

The composite itself is largely credible, others are also credible (they can give different results of course given there will be difference of opinion on the component factors and their weights...and the whole region is largely close overall to begin with I would say when averaged out in reality)....but what the big difference is the level of institutional corruption found in BD (for say govt propaganda purposes) compared to India and Pakistan (as bad as those two are overall too). BD is truly in its own level on that issue thus its crediblity is affected in the region.

On the other end is say Sri Lanka which has a quite good development and institutional metric, but records its wasting among its children at higher than India I believe. It tells us there is more to the story in the region a lot of the time (i.e particular holistic and specific regional approach is needed, no matter what a perception is or how good some other development data is) I think its beneficial to be open to the problems and not just make them go away on paper (like BD is largely dependent on compared to region)....since thats the first step in then dealing with the last 1/5th, quarter, third etc of the deprived population in whatever development metric is being discussed.

Everyone has long way to go on the matter at hand in the region....the local community driven/implemented solutions (like have so successfully been done in say Brazil and China) have to be the focus.

I'm surprised at Sri Lanka is ranked 84, worse than MM, Nepal, the Sri Lanka's normal GDP Per Capita is near $ 4000, 3x of MM, 5x of Nepal. Sri Lanka has a population of only 21 million, the least among the three nations.

SL probably has a collection of specific issues to be addressed still on the matter in comprehensive way. It also stands much better than say Bangladesh on institutional corruption and thus credibility...so its data can definitely be seen as much more genuine (i.e much larger likelihood that BD has much higher wasting, stunting etc than its reporting in its govt survey in order to make a particular govt seem like it has achieved progress).

Both these factors play a role w.r.t SL. Especially that its multiple prong issue. Not only is it just calorie supply (largely adequate averaged out in the region as whole), not only is it just sanitation (esp for children), but also education for the mothers on infant nutrition in first 3 years of life etc. Some components of this could be lacking in Sri Lanka that need to be addressed....that need not necessarily be in opposition to its other development data (life expectancy which is largely dependent on primary healthcare and basic infant mortality, overall education largely dependent on schooling access and spending and GDP per capita etc).

@Gibbs @Godman @Saradiel may have looked into this issue more and maybe can share.
 
.
This a "rubbish source". As bad as me, @PAKISTANFOREVER , @Chinese-Dragon @Mangus Ortus Novem set up a "Asian Nutrition Policy Institute" or ANPI and then drum up some figures. You know what figures you would get for India. Bangladesh? Don't even ask !

For someone who detests Bangladesh and Bangladeshis so much - you seem to be hanging around here with us and commenting an awful lot. Most people with this much hate wouldn't really care...

Is this a case of 'Pyaar and Nafrat are two sides of a coin'? :-)
 
.
SL probably has a collection of specific issues to be addressed still on the matter in comprehensive way. It also stands much better than say Bangladesh on institutional corruption and thus credibility...so its data can definitely be seen as much more genuine (i.e much larger likelihood that BD has much higher wasting, stunting etc than its reporting in its govt survey in order to make a particular govt seem like it has achieved progress).

Both these factors play a role w.r.t SL. Especially that its multiple prong issue. Not only is it just calorie supply (largely adequate averaged out in the region as whole), not only is it just sanitation (esp for children), but also education for the mothers on infant nutrition in first 3 years of life etc. Some components of this could be lacking in Sri Lanka that need to be addressed....that need not necessarily be in opposition to its other development data (life expectancy which is largely dependent on primary healthcare and basic infant mortality, overall education largely dependent on schooling access and spending and GDP per capita etc).

@Gibbs @Godman @Saradiel may have looked into this issue more and maybe can share.

I dont think they are worse off in wasting but just as bad, Btw wasting doesn't correlate with lack of food but wrong nutrition as well.. This seems to be the case in regards to Sri Lanka

Wasting in Sri Lanka Children unfortunately seem to be more prevalent in the plantation sector communities, They by any standard remain to most vulnerable, Sanitation and the Health issues pre and post natal doesn't seem to be the issue as far as the island is concerned

"Age Patterns. Malnutrition for a large proportion (about a fifth) of children begins after the sixth month of life (Table 3.3). Reasons for this may be low-birth weights, sustained and nurtured by inadequate breast-feeding and complementary feeding practices. But the risk of malnutrition increases sharply in the second year of life (beginning at age 12 months), when most children stop breast-feeding and begin relying almost exclusively on solid foods. The insufficiency and inadequacy of weaning diets in Sri Lanka increases the risk of malnutrition among infants."

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSRILANKA/Resources/MDG-Ch3.pdf

Oh and welcome back brah
 
.
india pakistan can be compared why they are big country
china and russia can be compared they are both big

bangladesh can be compared to nepal bhutan srilanka like that

gov is buy things but the price is not cheap and every thing in BD is expensive
 
.
I dont think they are worse off in wasting but just as bad, Btw wasting doesn't correlate with lack of food but wrong nutrition as well.. This seems to be the case in regards to Sri Lanka

Wasting in Sri Lanka Children unfortunately seem to be more prevalent in the plantation sector communities, They by any standard remain to most vulnerable, Sanitation and the Health issues pre and post natal doesn't seem to be the issue as far as the island is concerned

"Age Patterns. Malnutrition for a large proportion (about a fifth) of children begins after the sixth month of life (Table 3.3). Reasons for this may be low-birth weights, sustained and nurtured by inadequate breast-feeding and complementary feeding practices. But the risk of malnutrition increases sharply in the second year of life (beginning at age 12 months), when most children stop breast-feeding and begin relying almost exclusively on solid foods. The insufficiency and inadequacy of weaning diets in Sri Lanka increases the risk of malnutrition among infants."

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSRILANKA/Resources/MDG-Ch3.pdf

Oh and welcome back brah

Yes malnutrition has food and non-food components. The food components has largely been solved in the region (i.e raw calorie supply). Remaining food issue is the diet composition/quality (protein, minerals, vitamins etc) for the poorer segments of society. The non-food components also have to be addresed to greater degree now in regions where its the issue. The paper was a good read, but one thing that struck me is that all the regions of Sri Lanka had more or less high child malnutrition (esp compared to Sri Lanka HDI)...I don't think it was (given this was the year 2000 and things might have changed since) solely a plantation prevalence (though yes probably a driving factor just like the tribal communities in India also have higher prevalence of it today). Has Sri Lanka done a more recent study on the issue so we can compare the progress esp since the end of civil war and greater attention given to areas lacking socio-economic development compared to the average?
 
.
SL probably has a collection of specific issues to be addressed still on the matter in comprehensive way. It also stands much better than say Bangladesh on institutional corruption and thus credibility...so its data can definitely be seen as much more genuine (i.e much larger likelihood that BD has much higher wasting, stunting etc than its reporting in its govt survey in order to make a particular govt seem like it has achieved progress).

Both these factors play a role w.r.t SL. Especially that its multiple prong issue. Not only is it just calorie supply (largely adequate averaged out in the region as whole), not only is it just sanitation (esp for children), but also education for the mothers on infant nutrition in first 3 years of life etc. Some components of this could be lacking in Sri Lanka that need to be addressed....that need not necessarily be in opposition to its other development data (life expectancy which is largely dependent on primary healthcare and basic infant mortality, overall education largely dependent on schooling access and spending and GDP per capita etc).

Its a major issue but its not the severe type of undernourishment and stunting is low. A lot of Sri Lankans in rural areas and estate sector are malnourished. Lack of family planning in Rural areas and specially in Plantations is probably one of the biggest reasons that doesnt get enough attention. You can find families with over 4 children living in tiny shanties in Plantations and rural areas and the results are obvious.
Welfare programs need a major overhaul putting more attention on the nutritional needs of mothers as well as discouraging low incoming families from having large families by educating them on contraceptives and probably reduce the aid given to Low income families with each child after the 2nd
 
.
Back
Top Bottom