DalalErMaNodi
BANNED
- Joined
- May 12, 2020
- Messages
- 5,290
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Well you can imagine what the situation would be in Pakistan if PMLN refused to hand power to caretaker govt to run a credible election (which saw a peaceful transition of power to another party given the anti-incumbency)....and instead PMLN "won" a 95% seat mandate instead.
You tell me what would be the current situation resulting from that for GDP (esp credibility and sustainability) today if that happened, because that has happened in equivalent way for BD. BBS is an inflation laundering machine....and the reason is clear once you look at all 3rd party vetted data (trade, investment, loans and forex level)
PMIK has inherited a real mess, but at least first step of recognising the mess is done so it can be fixed over time. That is the main difference in credibility now between BD and rest of south asia that dont have 95% staged seat results....or linger at bottom 10% percentile of corruption constantly.
Well said....and of course we are seeing shooting of messenger already.
Just like that dhaka uni professor that pointed out that household consumption dropped in BBS own HIES survey once you factor in consumer price level.
BBS never responded to that....and same people attacked that analysis.
Then such people want to hold up ADB, WB, IMF or whomever else analysis/prediction....as though those groups have their own independent input data stream (regarding base consumptions and price levels) rather than the one published by BBS. ...i.e Nothing systematic from BBS gets baked in at all apparently....its all a fresh set of eyes and clean parallel streams.
Yes this is going to be quite bad chunk of years coming up for many countries. Not everything is going to recover at same rate either...and there is likely some level of long term (5+ years) damage to many sectors...esp. given what the overall equity yields are looking like now esp for developing countries.
Yah, but BD does not like doing those credibly (the dhaka prof I refer to is one example where there was no response to a major real result that was overlooked in a govt survey itself).
If BD had some sense it would fund (or simply allow independent funding of) more economic institutions to offer better internal challenges and debates and RFI etc for their monolith govt econometrics....like is done in better standards countries (with better credit ratings and corruption rankings) as result.
But the ruling PM has all kind of vendetta against even their better economic minds like prof yunus of grameen. She has 95% seat result to brag and lord over any dissonant voices.
Whether it is 95% or 85% is irrelevant, it's immaterial in the context of this thread and this discussion.
Bangladesh is not a democracy, nobody pretends it is one. No Bangladeshi will ever say Bangladesh is a democracy. Hasina just keeps up the sham for various reasons relating to international diplomacy.
We like it the way it is, we don't need democracy in Bangladesh.
So your obsession with the 95% figure is quite jarring and brings nothing to the discussion.
But it matches your modus operandi :
Derailment of thread by efficient use of pedantry, outdated data and incongruous comments about the state of our 'Democracy'.
In order words : A whole lot of nothingness.
I have but one question : Why ?
Last edited: