What's new

Forget 1962, India now better poised to deter the Dragon

India can try levelling all the mountains in the Tibetan plateau while Chinese mech infantries and tanks can enjoy pillaging all the heavily-populated towns, cities and village in the whole of the Gangetic plains

Who has more to lose? make your judgement haha.
article-2525602-1A2B2A3600000578-553_634x408.jpg

So you want to bring your infantry and tanks in to India by crossing tibetean plateau at 5000 ft followed by climbing 29,000 ft himalayas then descending 29,000 ft to attack us ?? If your fantasy ever comes true then you will be greeted by 1.4 million active IA + 2.1 million reserves + 1.4 million paramilitary personnel on this side. now wake up and smell your coffee..
 
.
So you want to bring your infantry and tanks in to India by crossing tibetean plateau at 5000 ft followed by climbing 29,000 ft himalayas then descending 29,000 ft to attack us ?? If your fantasy ever comes true then you will be greeted by 1.4 million active IA + 2.1 million reserves + 1.4 million paramilitary personnel on this side. now wake up and smell your coffee..
u have the right to argue the PLA would have to fight through those defenses to reach New Delhi- that's fine.

The point is New Delhi is within reach of the PLA. India controls the yummy and juicy lowlands on cis-Himalayas, while China occupies the desolate highlands in trans-Himalayas.

Third Eye said 'both' has to lose in a war- i refute that by highlighting only Tibetan Plateau can be involved on the Chinese side, while the entire towns, cities and villages in the Gangetic plains, with New Delhi included- would be devastated in an atual war.

New Delhi is within reach of the PLA, while India can only try motar-ing the mountains of the Tibetan Plateau.
 
.
u have the right to argue the PLA would have to fight through those defenses to reach New Delhi- that's fine.

The point is New Delhi is within reach of the PLA. India controls the yummy and juicy lowlands on cis-Himalayas, while China occupies the desolate highlands in trans-Himalayas.

You said 'both' has to lose in a war- i refute that by highlighting only Tibetan Plateau can be involved on the Chinese side, while the entire towns, cities and villages in the Gangetic plains, with New Delhi included- would be devastated in an atual war.

New Delhi is within reach of the PLA

Try breaching the first layer of defence, the mighty himalayas will discuss about your rest of rhetoric later.
 
.
Try breaching the first layer of defence, the mighty himalayas will discuss about your rest of rhetoric later.
sorry other than a defensive 'try breaching our defenses first'- u didnt refute my point at all- that the entire Gangetic plains of Northern india is under perpeptual threat by the PLA, while Bharat can only stare up at the mountains of Tibet.
 
.
actually it was in 1962 that india was better poised, now its not even a competition
uptill 1990 india was better posied

India has a fantasy of rolling their tanks into Beijing. It’s all fictional but they are obsessed with beating China. Just search YouTube and you will finds lots of “scenarios” where India conquer China.
 
. .
sorry other than a defensive 'try breaching our defenses first'- u didnt refute my point at all- that the entire Gangetic plains of Northern india is under perpeptual threat by the PLA, while Bharat can only stare up at the mountains of Tibet.

You do have an advantage mate, I give you that but then the advantage is very limited. You need to understand that the geography between India and china limits the possibility of a full fledged war and will hinder large scale movement of chinese in to India and vice-versa. What you are forgetting here is that India doesn't face tibet directly there are himalayas in between India and tibet.
 
.
Build up your economy first, keep your people well educated, well fed, and eliminate India's infamous gang-rape and other social problems instead of dwelling on wars.
 
.
India big talk, they made even higher claim than this one before 1962.

Article just talks about deterring Chinese not invasion

Truth is PLA divisions in Ngari can descend from the plateau and reach Delhi down in the rolling plains south within days

130886-004-3C973BC6-600x405.jpg

while India is stucked fighting their way up the plateau in Tibet. In other words, the PLA threatens the entire length and breadth of Northern India from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sia_Kangri to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walong, while the PLAN is poised at Southern India via its naval bases in the IOR. Yet only the Tibetan buffer region of China is pitted again india in any future land battlefield.

India can try levelling all the mountains in the Tibetan plateau while Chinese mech infantries and tanks can enjoy pillaging all the heavily-populated towns, cities and village in the whole of the Gangetic plains

Who has more to lose? make your judgement haha.

All the best for the attack on south India , make sure you done have such rules in the countries you are having a base in IOR :D

https://www.thehindubusinessline.co...rmitted-at-hambantota-port/article9522287.ece
 
. .
It will be a sad day when both nations have to resort to the last & worst option.

However, should it come both shall suffer incalculable & avoidable harm.

It does & will not matter who hurt whom more , there will only be losers on both ends.
I wish such sensibility prevails everywhere in the region.
 
.
And we show how paper dragons became a pussy cat in Doklam. If any conflicts hapens, papr dragon shall become a pussy cat once again.

The fact on the ground shows that India retreated. Otherwise, you can claim India colonized Britain and India taught British English. That India taught British parliamentary democracy and Cricket. And that caste system doesn’t exist in India. And that Aryan invasion never happened.
 
.
And why does that bother you ? :cheesy:

If it's not true, you should be happy.

In any case, India is seeking friendship with china, so isn't it better to have a strong friend ? Either way you stand to win, so what is the problem ?



We all know that's not true.

But if that makes you feel any better, then why should I destroy your fantasy.

In any case we desire friendship, not war. So what is your point ? Do you even have one ?




So you plan to "invade" India over this ? :cheesy:........... well good luck with that :P

LOL... you think India will wait for you to cross the Himalayas ?

Its a LOT easier for us to invade tibet than for you to cross the entire Himalayan range and come into India. :cheesy:
the last time i checked, china is the 1 occupying the Tibetan plateau, while India is occupying the plains south of it. You are advocating that it is easy for India to rush up the mountains into higher lands than it is for China to descent from the plateau into the plains below. Even my dog is laughing at your logic.

Is it harder to stare up or to stare down? make ur judgement

india-political-map.jpg

Is Delhi far or near the LAC?

once past the Himalayas, it's all tank country past the vast Gangetic plains for hundred and hundred of kilomettres:

sri-tent-yamuna_231b548a-e1b5-11e5-9948-13623a58218c.jpg


Uttar%20Pradesh%20005.jpg


Also , ur assuming only tanks would be employed in a war. That's ludicrous. The short distance between Delhi and missile bases in Tibet means the former would be guaranteed a 'rain of hell' enough to make Lord Shiva cry in Lake mansarovar

https://www.google.com.sg/search?rl......0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.Btv0DkB8vfU

Is Delhi vulnerable or not?

Make your own judgement

And i like how i provoked your hyper-defensive rhetoric and anxiety laughter.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
.
The fact on the ground shows that India retreated. Otherwise, you can claim India colonized Britain and India taught British English. That India taught British parliamentary democracy and Cricket. And that caste system doesn’t exist in India. And that Aryan invasion never happened.

It honestly scares the sh*t out of me when a refugee like you in the US has such a good handle on South Asian matters :eek:
 
.
This is not the 18th century, we do not have to "rush up into highlands" :lol:

We have aircrafts and helicopters that will drop our troops directly into those highlands. :P

We have Aircrafts that will provide air support and missiles that will negate any need to "rush up mountains".

With satellites looking down, nobody has to "look up " any more. That along with AWACS.

If you continue to think like a 16th century strategist, then you have lot of room for comfort. But ....sadly for you. Welcome to warfare in the 21st century.
u r disgressing further n further away from the main point- and that is Delhi is not far away from the LAC.

Also i did mention that in a war, Tibet or more precisely- the seemingly-infinite granites of desolate mountains after mountains after moutnains could potentially be shelled/motar-ed/blasted by india, while the entire heavily-populated belt of villages, towns and major cities in the Gangetic plain with Delhi in it just south of the Himalayas- would be at china's mercy. Better start constructing more bomb shelters(in addition to toilets) now.

Koomb.jpg

You chose to ignore this cos u knew it's painful to have your ballz being clamped by others.

With the Northern plains permanently under threat by the PLA and PLARF- and the Southern coastline under threat from the PLAN bases being established in the IOR, i would have shifted the capital further south to the centre of the Deccan plateau if i were the President of India,

I respectfully advise; better start bulilding more bomb shelters in the North(dont stop building the toilets though)

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom