What's new

Foreign views on Indian polls

himalayah

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
98
Reaction score
-3
It's interesting to read non-Indian sources, especially from countries that are not Anglophone, to get an idea of how others in the world view India's elections. Going to post one such article, feel free to add others.


Indians go to the polls from April 7 to May 12 to choose a new government. And the millions of young people in the country will play a major role in what is becoming a new kind of campaign.



814 million Indians have the right to vote in the election, a number larger than the population of Europe. Around 930,000 polling stations have been set up all over the country. This makes the Indian elections the largest in the world. And of these there are a record 100 million first time voters.

Political analysts attach a great deal of importance to this demographic shift. CRS Murthy, Professor in International Organization at Jawaharlal University in New Delhi says, "The young population in Indian demographics has gained unprecedented importance, both in urban as well as rural areas. Therefore, I believe, they will decide the difference between the winner and the loser."

This has consequences, according to Murthy: "The pattern of political campaigns by established political parties has changed dramatically to involve the youth.” Moreover, to reach young voters campaigning is going digital for the first time in a big way: “I think the potential for youth participation in politics has increased because of the technological interventions, such as the role of social media, which the youth is quite well acquainted with."

Not just first time voters

But the importance of first time voters is not the only factor which is making this election different from elections in the past. There has also been a marked shift in the attitudes and electoral preferences which take public disenchantment with politics as a whole into account.

For the first time voters will have "NOTA" i.e. None Of The Above option. If they do not approve of any of the candidates then they can press the NOTA button on the voting machines.

Voters are not – it appears – willing to accept anything. Since the first national elections in 1952, the ruling Congress party has held power for over 40 years. The Hindu-nationalist party BJP (Bhartiya Janata Party) has been the main opposition since its existence in the 80s. But now a new populist party with strong grassroots support in the cities has emerged, namely the anti-corruption Aam Aadmi Party, the common man's party.


Modi has sought to place economic development rather than religion or caste into the forefront of voters' minds.

Apart from the all pervading corruption in India's ruling elite, women's safety has become a major issue amongst young middle class voters who do not accept the patriarchal view of society propagated by the older generation.

The current government – led by Congress – has been condemned in the media for ignoring the issue of women's safety until forced to do so by public opinion after the terrible rape-murder of a young student in New Delhi in December 2012.

Development and employment

Moreover, India has traditionally been a country of voting based on religion and caste. However this time round this factor appears to be declining in significance somewhat. The opposition BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi has sought to place economic development rather than religion or caste into the forefront of voters' minds. He recently promised to create 10 million new jobs if he comes in power. But his reputation is tarnished.

It is alleged that as Chief Minister of Gujarat he failed to move to end religiously inspired riots in 2002 which led to over 900 deaths. Even though the allegations were never proven, Modi is trying to keep the issue out of the campaign. Political analyst Purushottam Agrawal says, "Modi in particular and BJP in general have been smart enough to shift the focus entirely on to (economic) development. The question of accountability for the 2002 massacre in Gujarat comes directly, so it's good for him not to talk on this issue."

Americanization of Indian politics

Also, the way the BJP has personalized the campaign is new to India. It is Narendra Modi versus Rahul Gandhi (Prime ministerial candidate from Congress and son of the ex PM Rajiv Gandhi). Their personalities are taking precedence over the parties' manifestos.


Experts say Rahul Gandhi appears to be uncomfortable in his new role in the limelight

Purushottam Agrawal again: "BJP has been wanting India to adopt the American presidential (campaigning) style. It suits them fine." The worrying thing for Congress is that their candidate, Rahul Gandhi, is performing poorly. He lacks the charisma of past greats in the family dynasty and appears to be uncomfortable in his new role in the limelight.

Whether the drama of the campaign will be that significant is to be doubted. As CSR Murthy predicts, "The actual drama (…) will start after May 16, after the results are announced. Then, according to the latest polls, Indian voters may have denied both major parties a parliamentary majority by strengthening protest and regional parties. And then the arduous task of building a viable coalition will begin."

India goes to the polls | Asia | DW.DE | 01.04.2014
 
I disagree with the comparison to democracy in America, because there are a set of challenges and compulsions, both conscious and subconscious, which are uniquely Indian and would be difficult to replicate elsewhere if attempted at the same scale. India's political culture really is chaos theory in motion, but the fact that all difficulties aside, elections are held and the mandate more or less accepted until the next round, is remarkably miraculous in my eyes and an enormous strength to build on for the future.
 
I disagree with the comparison to democracy in America, because there are a set of challenges and compulsions, both conscious and subconscious, which are uniquely Indian and would be difficult to replicate elsewhere if attempted at the same scale. India's political culture really is chaos theory in motion, but the fact that all difficulties aside, elections are held and the mandate more or less accepted until the next round, is remarkably miraculous in my eyes and an enormous strength to build on for the future.

Yes.

Indian democracy is still immature. Indian polls still depend upon money, gifts, liquor, violence, selling votes, fake identities, illegal (bangalesdhi, sri lankans, pakistanis, nepalis) migrants given voter ID, aadhaar cards (happen only in India).

May be another 2-3 decades to evolve as a matured democracy.
 

How is it not ?

Yes.

Indian democracy is still immature. Indian polls still depend upon money, gifts, liquor, violence, selling votes, fake identities, illegal (bangalesdhi, sri lankans, pakistanis, nepalis) migrants given voter ID, aadhaar cards (happen only in India).

May be another 2-3 decades to evolve as a matured democracy.

How is freebies during election make the democracy "immature" ? :cheesy:

Does it take away their right to vote in any way ?

By what logic does giving Millions of $ to Large Advertisement companies part of "mature democracy" while directly given the money to the public is "immature democracy" ? :lol: ....... do tell.
 
A mature democracy is dependent on a mature market economy, where there is legal protection and respect for property rights or the application of contracts. All the other things are just a form. Different countries has different ways, different regime, but one thing is common, we only care whether our govt represent the most people's interests.
 
A mature democracy is dependent on a mature market economy, where there is legal protection and respect for property rights or the application of contracts. All the other things are just a form. Different countries has different ways, different regime, but one thing is common, we only care whether our govt represent the most people's interests.

Democracy also provides and opportunity for the people to show their displeasure to the ruling elite every 5 years. It ensures a TWO way communication, not one way. It ensures that the people do not have to rely on the "good will" or "good intentions" of the ruling elite.
 
India is light years behind an American style of democracy.


India is a country of lots of diversity. In india, it is very difficult to standardize everything like America.

How ever our election is a biggest administrative exercise of the world involving lots of complexities.

We should justifiably be proud of that.
 
Last edited:
Yes.

Indian democracy is still immature. Indian polls still depend upon money, gifts, liquor, violence, selling votes, fake identities, illegal (bangalesdhi, sri lankans, pakistanis, nepalis) migrants given voter ID, aadhaar cards (happen only in India).

May be another 2-3 decades to evolve as a matured democracy.

How does this makes democracy immature? Based on system voter has right to vote who he/ she thinks is right candidate. All these activities does not takes away there privileges to vote and select candidate of their liking. This the soul of democracy and it's right here with us.

Regarding illegal immigrants, money, liquor - these represent failure of administrative system not democracy. Please don't mix them .
 
Democracy also provides and opportunity for the people to show their displeasure to the ruling elite every 5 years. It ensures a TWO way communication, not one way. It ensures that the people do not have to rely on the "good will" or "good intentions" of the ruling elite.

Agreed. This is what I've been thinking about. Elite ruling might be efficient and effective in top design, but the basis is common PEOPLE, never should be forgot. Only the market's strength is enough strong to be able to negotiate with elite level, a balanced situation will occur, this is two way communication. If one party is too strong while the other party is too weak, there is only bully, no talk, no deals. Btw, it's not purely politics, economy situation always decides the top structure................by Marx :)
 
Agreed. This is what I've been thinking about. Elite ruling might be efficient and effective in top design, but the basis is common PEOPLE, never should be forgot. Only the market's strength is enough strong to be able to negotiate with elite level, a balanced situation will occur, this is two way communication. If one party is too strong while the other party is too weak, there is only bully, no talk, no deals. Btw, it's not purely politics, economy situation always decides the top structure................by Marx :)

Economic situation decides the top structure only when the structure itself is rigid.

There are multiple structures in the world we live in, social structures, political structures, economic structures, cultural structures, religious structure, moral structures etc .....

It is only democracy which can ensure all these structures unite in harmony.

Marx failed because he did not recognize all the various multiple structures that exists in the world. His world was far to simplistic.
 
How does this makes democracy immature? Based on system voter has right to vote who he/ she thinks is right candidate. All these activities does not takes away there privileges to vote and select candidate of their liking. This the soul of democracy and it's right here with us.

Regarding illegal immigrants, money, liquor - these represent failure of administrative system not democracy. Please don't mix them .

Buying votes, luring voters with gifts, cash, liquor, TVs, laptops, tablets, Phones what not is this mature democracy?

How does this makes democracy immature? Based on system voter has right to vote who he/ she thinks is right candidate. All these activities does not takes away there privileges to vote and select candidate of their liking. This the soul of democracy and it's right here with us.

Regarding illegal immigrants, money, liquor - these represent failure of administrative system not democracy. Please don't mix them .

No it is not failure of administrative system. Voters take and politicians give, where does administrators come into picture? :hitwall:
 
Economic situation decides the top structure only when the structure itself is rigid.

There are multiple structures in the world we live in, social structures, political structures, economic structures, cultural structures, religious structure, moral structures etc .....

It is only democracy which can ensure all these structures unite in harmony.

Marx failed because he did not recognize all the various multiple structures that exists in the world. His world was far to simplistic.

Or maybe his "structure" is exactly an broadly inclusive concept. Sometimes you can't see the relations between different structures, it's complicated, but they are interdependent anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom