What's new

Fitch downgrades Pakistan’s rating from stable to negative, sees 'considerable risks' to IMF programme

Corruptistan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 28, 2022
Messages
1,475
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Denmark

Fitch downgrades Pakistan’s outlook to negative, sees 'considerable risks' to IMF programme

  • Renewed political volatility could undermine authorities' fiscal and external adjustment, it says
BR Web Desk Updated 19 Jul, 2022

Fitch Ratings agency on Tuesday downgraded Pakistan’s outlook from stable to negative in view of the significant deterioration in the country's external liquidity position and financing conditions since early 2022.

In a statement, the credit rating entity affirmed Long-Term Foreign-Currency (LTFC) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-'.

Fitch cited a host of other factors behind its decision to downward revise the ratings outlook. It added that renewed political volatility could undermine the authorities' fiscal and external adjustment, as happened in early 2022 and 2018, particularly in the current environment of slowing growth and high inflation.

We forecast slower growth of 3.5% in FY23 amid fiscal and monetary tightening, high imported inflation, and a weaker external demand outlook, all of which will also hit household and business confidence: Fitch
Moody's downgrades Pakistan's outlook to negative from stable

“Pakistan's 'B-' rating reflects recurring external vulnerability, a narrow fiscal revenue base and low governance indicator scores compared with the 'B' median,” said Fitch, adding that external funding conditions and liquidity will likely improve with the new staff-level agreement.

“Former prime minister Imran Khan has called on the government to hold early elections and has been organising large-scale protests in cities around the country,” the agency pointed out. “The new government is supported by a disparate coalition of parties with only a slim majority in parliament.”

Regular elections are due in October 2023, creating the risk of policy slippage after the conclusion of the IMF programme, it added.

Fitch saw considerable risks to the implementation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme and to continued access of Pakistan to financing after the programme's expiry in June 2023 in a tough economic and political climate.

Citing that Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves were under pressure, it added that limited external funding and large current account deficits had drained the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP)-held reserves.

It argued that the SBP has used reserves to slow currency depreciation. Liquid net FX reserves at the SBP declined to about $10 billion or just over one month of current external payments by June 2022, down from about $16 billion a year earlier.

The agency estimated Pakistan’s current account deficit (CAD) to reach $17 billion (4.6% of GDP) in fiscal year ended June 2022 (FY22), driven by soaring global oil prices and a rise in non-oil imports boosted by strong private consumption.

However, measures such as fiscal tightening, higher interest rates, and moves to limit energy consumption and imports could narrow CAD to $10 billion (2.6% of GDP) in FY23, it said.

The agency shared that preliminary estimates show real GDP growth of 6% for FY22, up from 5.7% in FY21, mostly driven by private consumption, as in FY21, while net exports continued to weigh on growth.

“In our view, this largely reflected a loosening of fiscal policy in FY22, as well as a fairly loose monetary policy despite significant tightening throughout the year (ex-post real policy rates on average negative in FY22),” it said.

“We forecast slower growth of 3.5% in FY23 amid fiscal and monetary tightening, high imported inflation, and a weaker external demand outlook, all of which will also hit household and business confidence,” the agency stated.

Fitch was of the view that debt maturities of about $9 billion to bilateral creditors (chiefly Saudi Arabia and China), should be fairly easy to roll over with an IMF programme in place.

“Staff-level agreement will potentially unlock $4 billion in IMF disbursements to Pakistan in FY23, assuming board approval of a $1 billion augmentation and extension to June 2023,” it said.

The credit ratings agency said that the fiscal deficit widened to 7.5% of GDP (nearly Rs5 trillion) in FY22, from 6.1% in FY21.

“We expect a narrowing of the deficit to 5.6% of GDP (about Rs4.6 trillion or USD22 billion) in FY23, driven by spending restraint as well as by expanded taxation, including higher corporate and personal income taxes and increases in the petroleum levy. Our forecast of the fiscal deficit is about 1% of GDP wider than the authorities' target,” it said.

Moreover, Fitch estimates Pakistan's debt/GDP at 73% as at FYE22, broadly in line with the current 'B' median, which is expected to decline to 66% in FY23 and remain on a downward trend, helped by high inflation and a modest primary deficit, “which we forecast at 0.9% of GDP in FY23, down from 2.8% of GDP in FY22”.

Fitch forecast of average inflation in Pakistan of 19% in FY23 and 8% in FY24 largely reflects base effects, but recent and planned future energy price hikes will all fuel broad-based inflation and mean inflation is skewed to the upside.


1658259493341.jpeg


Bajwa and Shehbaz economics: Crashed the rupee from Rs.181 to Rs.225 against the dollar in just three months.

When will those traitors resign?
 
Multilateral agencies (like WB, IMF etc) and rating agencies (like Fitch) are heavily staffed by Indians. While I am not questioning their integrity, some biases cannot be ruled out.

Regards
 
Multilateral agencies (like WB, IMF etc) and rating agencies (like Fitch) are heavily staffed by Indians. While I am not questioning their integrity, some biases cannot be ruled out.

Regards
Okay. So ratings are assigned based on a somewhat publicly disclosed methodology. The assessment is purely data driven using objective measures.

You can obviously question the methodology but not the veracity of the results itself. There are very strict controls in place to ensure data integrity. To manipulate data to skew results singling out Pakistan would amount to actual malicious intent — which no professional in the industry would do. Mostly because rewards associated with the risks are just not worth it. Also Pakistan isn’t that important to be singled out.

Also even if manipulation occurred at the assessment stage, the board has to approve the final results. Typically there is also a management committee that double checks before it even gets to the board.

This is a good place to start.
 
Last edited:
Multilateral agencies (like WB, IMF etc) and rating agencies (like Fitch) are heavily staffed by Indians. While I am not questioning their integrity, some biases cannot be ruled out.

Regards
Every update, opinion and decision from WB and IMF are published with COMPLETE set of reasoning. 2 + 3 =5. If you disagree with 5, say why you think the 2 or the + or the 3 is wrong. Instead you take false solace saying it's bias by Indian staffers.
 
This is a part of the "punishment" envisaged in the letter from the State Department. Hopefully, Pak's undocumented economy, oiled by undocumented finances from various sources, will grow further under the patronage of the Deep State to offset these setbacks....

It's an Intelligence War by other means...
 
@Hakikat ve Hikmet

Hopefully, Pak's undocumented economy, oiled by undocumented finances from various sources,

True, sir! As Brofessor sb (@RiazHaq) says Pak's real economy is USD $1.6 trillion. It is not Pakistan economy which is in trouble, it is Pak's public finances which are in trouble.

Regards
 
Multilateral agencies (like WB, IMF etc) and rating agencies (like Fitch) are heavily staffed by Indians. While I am not questioning their integrity, some biases cannot be ruled out.

Regards
Good excuse and self relaxing thoughts. This hope and temporary bliss created out of ignorance will certainly add to the imminent economic doom.

But still there is time to be careful and vigilant to avoid the consequences.
People must open their eyes first to see the things around them
 
@RescueRanger @lightoftruth

Pakistan is too big a state and nuclear armed at that to be allowed to go down. It will hobble for sure for at least a year, irrespective of whether it is the Importeds or Kaptaan sb who is in power but no one will allow it to collapse.

Regards
That's just wishful thinking,

USSR was much bigger and had much more nukes.
 
Back
Top Bottom