Jesus, I don't think you understand English.
Going back to the first thing I said, you cannot be on your high horse while taking side, when you started defending Russian action while condemning the same action the US took. YOU ARE TAKING SIDE.
Just because you do not agree on Russia invasion does not make you "Neutral", what you are saying is exactly what the Chinese are saying, they see Russia is pushing, into invading Ukraine, but they are wrong to invade and they should have look at other option first, does that mean China is "neutral" in this matter? Orban are also oppose to the invasion, does that mean he is also "Neutral" toward Russia? You essentially agreed on Russian Casus Belli, that mean you are taking their side, because if you are neutral, you don't
AGREE (Taking Russia side) OR
DISAGREE (Taking Ukrainian side) on their Casus Belli, you staying away. You are not saying Russian can do what they do, that did not matter to me, you are saying you agree on what Russia is doing. Even tho that is not matter to you.
I don't know what kind of English level you got to think being agree on their reason to war but opposing it actually doing it is "Neutral" I mean, you do know what neutral mean, right? That's not taking side on an argument.
Then going back to the original post. when I list a list of war that both US and Russia involved without any commentary, I did not defend the US starting those war, nor did I condemn Russia starting those war, the first thing you do in your reply is to "DEFEND" the Russian action. THAT IS NOT BEING NEUTRAL. If you are being neutral, you either will not comment on any of those, or condemn both. But no, you see that there are "Reason" for Russia to do whatever you were condemning the US do, that mean you TOOK Russian side.
So no, you are not neutral in Ukraine, nor were you Neutral in general. You are Pro-Russian, which make the post you made a
HYPOCRITICAL.
CAPISH,FIONA?
