What's new

Fake encounter in Buchoo area of Tral in south Kashmir.


Basic common sense, GFI indexes civil liberties and political rights for their rankings, so how can it be contrary to HRW findings..

Plus, HR organisations have regularly tabulated HR violations in GB and AJK..

Plus press freedom score is also low..
 
.
Another civilian killed in another Fake encounter.
The militant army is claiming to have got killed during an encounter in Kamala forests of Bachoo Tral has turned out to be a civilian.
Sources said that the deceased has been identified as Khalid Muzaffar. Khalid according to local sources is the brother of most wanted Hizb commander, Burhan. Burhan is a resident of Tral.
Sources revealed that Tral police have refused to take the body of the deceased. Officials are however, tight lipped about the local’s allegations.
Photo of Shaheed Khalid Muzaffar who was killed today by Indian forces in an alleged Fake encounter in Buchoo area of Tral in south Kashmir.
View attachment 214774
@Horus @fakhre mirpur @Zarvan @Umair Nawaz @Shamain

Stop genocide of Kashmiri youth.
@SrNair
Free Kashmir.
Ya Just Jamaat ul dawa and Hisbul are Perfect people :crazy::crazy::crazy::cuckoo:
 
. .
Basic common sense, GFI indexes civil liberties and political rights for their rankings, so how can it be contrary to HRW findings..

Plus, HR organisations have regularly tabulated HR violations in GB and AJK..

Plus press freedom score is also low..

Unless you can prove sources otherwise, HRW and AI have documented untold amount of abuses in IOK. I have never heard of gfi. What is reported in gb and Ajk pales in comparison to iok
 
.
Terrorists will face bullet and death .Terrorists religion or native place is not a subject for bullets and religion.
Govt did a good job.
It was a fake encounter of a young boy.
FYI there is no bullet or rifle involved in this murder he was beaten to death.
 
.
Unless you can prove sources otherwise, HRW and AI have documented untold amount of abuses in IOK. I have never heard of gfi. What is reported in gb and Ajk pales in comparison to iok

Kashmir conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Azad KashmirEdit
Main article: Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir
Claims of religious discrimination and restrictions on religious freedom in Azad Kashmir have been made against Pakistan.[195] The country is also accused of systemic suppression of free speech and demonstrations against the government.[195] UNHCR reported that a number of Islamist militant groups, including al-Qaeda, operate from bases in Pakistani-administered Kashmir with the tacit permission of ISI[180][195] There have also been several allegations of human rights abuse.[180]

In 2006, Human Rights Watch accused ISI and the military of systemic torture with the purpose of "punishing" errant politicians, political activists and journalists in Azad Kashmir.[196] A report titled "Kashmir: Present Situation and Future Prospects", submitted to the European Parliament by Emma Nicholson, was critical of the lack of human rights, justice, democracy, and Kashmiri representation in the Pakistan National Assembly.[197] According to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan's ISI operates in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and is accused of involvement in extensive surveillance, arbitrary arrests, torture, and murder.[195] The 2008 report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees determined that Pakistan-administered Kashmir was 'not free'.[195] According to Shaukat Ali, chairman of the International Kashmir Alliance, "On one hand Pakistan claims to be the champion of the right of self-determination of the Kashmiri people, but she has denied the same rights under its controlled parts of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan".[198]

After the 2011 elections, Azad Kashmir Prime Minister Sardar Attique Ahmad Khan stated that there were mistakes in the voters list which have raised questions about the credibility of the elections.[199]

In December 1993, the blasphemy laws of Pakistan were extended to Pakistan Administered Kashmir. The area is ruled directly through a chief executive Lt. Gen. Mohammed Shafiq, appointed by Islamabad with a 26-member Northern Areas Council.[200]

UNCR reports that the status of women in Pakistani-administered Kashmir is similar to that of women in Pakistan. They are not granted equal rights under the law, and their educational opportunities and choice of marriage partner remain "circumscribed". Domestic violence, forced marriage, and other forms of abuse continue to be issues of concern. In May 2007, the United Nations and other aid agencies temporarily suspended their work after suspected Islamists mounted an arson attack on the home of two aid workers after the organisations had received warnings against hiring women. However, honour killings and rape occur less frequently than in other areas of Pakistan.[180]

Gilgit-BaltistanEdit
The main demand of the people of Gilgit-Baltistan is constitutional status for the region as a fifth province of Pakistan.[201][202] However, Pakistan claims that Gilgit-Baltistan cannot be given constitutional status due to Pakistan's commitment to the 1948 UN resolution.[202][203] In 2007, the International Crisis Group stated that "Almost six decades after Pakistan's independence, the constitutional status of the Federally Administered Northern Areas (Gilgit and Baltistan), once part of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir and now under Pakistani control, remains undetermined, with political autonomy a distant dream. The region's inhabitants are embittered by Islamabad's unwillingness to devolve powers in real terms to its elected representatives, and a nationalist movement, which seeks independence, is gaining ground. The rise of sectarian extremism is an alarming consequence of this denial of basic political rights".[204] A two-day conference on Gilgit-Baltistan was held on 8–9 April 2008 at the European Parliament in Brussels under the auspices of the International Kashmir Alliance.[205] Several members of the European Parliament expressed concern over human rights violations in Gilgit-Baltistan and urged the government of Pakistan to establish democratic institutions and the rule of law in the area.[205][206]

In 2009, the Pakistani government implemented an autonomy package for Gilgit-Baltistan, which entails rights similar to those of Pakistan’s other provinces.[201] Gilgit-Baltistan thus gains province-like status without actually being conferred such status constitutionally.[201][203] Direct rule by Islamabad has been replaced by an elected legislative assembly under a chief minister.[201][203]

There has been criticism and opposition to this move in Pakistan, India, and Pakistan administrated Kashmir.[207] The move has been dubbed a cover-up to hide the real mechanics of power, which allegedly are under the direct control of the Pakistani federal government.[208] The package was opposed by Pakistani Kashmiri politicians who claimed that the integration of Gilgit-Baltistan into Pakistan would undermine their case for the independence of Kashmir from India.[209] 300 activists from Kashmiri groups protested during the first Gilgit-Baltistan legislative assembly elections, with some carrying banners reading "Pakistan's expansionist designs in Gilgit-Baltistan are unacceptable"[202]

In December 2009, activists from nationalist Kashmiri groups staged a protest in Muzaffarabad to condemn the alleged rigging of elections and the killing of an 18-year old student.[210]

It was a fake encounter of a young boy.
FYI there is no bullet or rifle involved in this murder he was beaten to death.

Did you go and see for yourself? :rofl:
 
.
Kashmir conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Azad KashmirEdit
Main article: Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir
Claims of religious discrimination and restrictions on religious freedom in Azad Kashmir have been made against Pakistan.[195] The country is also accused of systemic suppression of free speech and demonstrations against the government.[195] UNHCR reported that a number of Islamist militant groups, including al-Qaeda, operate from bases in Pakistani-administered Kashmir with the tacit permission of ISI[180][195] There have also been several allegations of human rights abuse.[180]

In 2006, Human Rights Watch accused ISI and the military of systemic torture with the purpose of "punishing" errant politicians, political activists and journalists in Azad Kashmir.[196] A report titled "Kashmir: Present Situation and Future Prospects", submitted to the European Parliament by Emma Nicholson, was critical of the lack of human rights, justice, democracy, and Kashmiri representation in the Pakistan National Assembly.[197] According to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan's ISI operates in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and is accused of involvement in extensive surveillance, arbitrary arrests, torture, and murder.[195] The 2008 report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees determined that Pakistan-administered Kashmir was 'not free'.[195] According to Shaukat Ali, chairman of the International Kashmir Alliance, "On one hand Pakistan claims to be the champion of the right of self-determination of the Kashmiri people, but she has denied the same rights under its controlled parts of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan".[198]

After the 2011 elections, Azad Kashmir Prime Minister Sardar Attique Ahmad Khan stated that there were mistakes in the voters list which have raised questions about the credibility of the elections.[199]

In December 1993, the blasphemy laws of Pakistan were extended to Pakistan Administered Kashmir. The area is ruled directly through a chief executive Lt. Gen. Mohammed Shafiq, appointed by Islamabad with a 26-member Northern Areas Council.[200]

UNCR reports that the status of women in Pakistani-administered Kashmir is similar to that of women in Pakistan. They are not granted equal rights under the law, and their educational opportunities and choice of marriage partner remain "circumscribed". Domestic violence, forced marriage, and other forms of abuse continue to be issues of concern. In May 2007, the United Nations and other aid agencies temporarily suspended their work after suspected Islamists mounted an arson attack on the home of two aid workers after the organisations had received warnings against hiring women. However, honour killings and rape occur less frequently than in other areas of Pakistan.[180]

Gilgit-BaltistanEdit
The main demand of the people of Gilgit-Baltistan is constitutional status for the region as a fifth province of Pakistan.[201][202] However, Pakistan claims that Gilgit-Baltistan cannot be given constitutional status due to Pakistan's commitment to the 1948 UN resolution.[202][203] In 2007, the International Crisis Group stated that "Almost six decades after Pakistan's independence, the constitutional status of the Federally Administered Northern Areas (Gilgit and Baltistan), once part of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir and now under Pakistani control, remains undetermined, with political autonomy a distant dream. The region's inhabitants are embittered by Islamabad's unwillingness to devolve powers in real terms to its elected representatives, and a nationalist movement, which seeks independence, is gaining ground. The rise of sectarian extremism is an alarming consequence of this denial of basic political rights".[204] A two-day conference on Gilgit-Baltistan was held on 8–9 April 2008 at the European Parliament in Brussels under the auspices of the International Kashmir Alliance.[205] Several members of the European Parliament expressed concern over human rights violations in Gilgit-Baltistan and urged the government of Pakistan to establish democratic institutions and the rule of law in the area.[205][206]

In 2009, the Pakistani government implemented an autonomy package for Gilgit-Baltistan, which entails rights similar to those of Pakistan’s other provinces.[201] Gilgit-Baltistan thus gains province-like status without actually being conferred such status constitutionally.[201][203] Direct rule by Islamabad has been replaced by an elected legislative assembly under a chief minister.[201][203]

There has been criticism and opposition to this move in Pakistan, India, and Pakistan administrated Kashmir.[207] The move has been dubbed a cover-up to hide the real mechanics of power, which allegedly are under the direct control of the Pakistani federal government.[208] The package was opposed by Pakistani Kashmiri politicians who claimed that the integration of Gilgit-Baltistan into Pakistan would undermine their case for the independence of Kashmir from India.[209] 300 activists from Kashmiri groups protested during the first Gilgit-Baltistan legislative assembly elections, with some carrying banners reading "Pakistan's expansionist designs in Gilgit-Baltistan are unacceptable"[202]

In December 2009, activists from nationalist Kashmiri groups staged a protest in Muzaffarabad to condemn the alleged rigging of elections and the killing of an 18-year old student.[210]



Did you go and see for yourself? :rofl:
I told you if you don't have sufficient news to post then avoid trolling.
 
. . . .
let me show you mirror to make you realize how stupid you are...
-> facts about Pak Occupied Kashmir, occupied gilgit baltistan
* no real legislative power

* minister imposed by Pak with king like powers who can solely dissmiss ellected assembly and who can create laws even without any consult from legislature

* at least 5 terrorist camps ( excluding Afghani, locals and pakistani) have been established throughout balwaristan...

* unlike Indian J and K, Pak intentionally abolished " estate subject rule" to settle its nationals and drug dealers and terrorists to Azad Kashmir

Author Abdul Hamid Khan is the chairman of Balwaristan national front... and here is the link -
the.kashmirtelegraph.com/0803/one.htm?m=1
and yes , stop calling us cunning baniyas, you mechanic
If residents of Azad Kashmir are mistreated like J&K then why they are loyal to Pakistan like Sepahi Maqbool Hussain.
a021-sipahi-makbool-hussain.jpg


Someone else had asked for source.. Kindly read your own self posted topic more carefully..
You are referred to post#40
and after it post#54
 
.
If residents of Azad Kashmir are mistreated like J&K then why they are loyal to Pakistan like Sepahi Maqbool Hussain.
View attachment 214892
engineer saab, if you would had studied the article from the link provided... you would not had asked the same... let me find a link for you in which a Azad Kashmir's influential person( i cant remember his name) said that if allowed 99.9% people of Azad Kashmir will choose for India...
 
. .
SRINAGAR – Pro-freedom group Hurriyat Conference led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq on Tuesday expressed serious concern over killing of two men in Pulwama district of Jammu and Kashmir, whom army labelled as militants but locals maintain that at least one of them was a civilian.

Mirwaiz accused the Indian army of killing the duo in a “fake encounter” while being under custody. “Both youth, who were killed under custody, were well educated, unarmed and innocent,” he said, adding, “Labelling them as militants was just to cover the criminal act of men in uniform.”
.
While locals claim one of them was a civilan,what about the other one,was he a terrorist while Mirwaiz says both youths were educated,unarmed & innocent. Just see the contradictory statements.
 
.
I don't like the whole "suspected" militant thing. These things have happened in the past and it was an innocent person. I thought this had been something of the past. I hope an investigation is carried out.
As for the "Azad Kashmir" stuff. Please stop, that is our ancestral land and no one "occupies" it, apart from the people of AJK.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom