What's new

Facebook under fire over Kashmir killings gag

Read my post again where did i said i have a problem about India banning FB? I have a problem with FB deleting and suspending accounts of those that are trying to highlight on whats going on in Kashmir. Learn to read first before hitting the reply button.
Okay boss, I guess "censorship" is okay for you as long as it's not censoring whom you deem as innocent.

article-1279690-09A7E41A000005DC-583_634x436.jpg
 
.
Good terrorist, bad terrorist. Pakistani policy will never change. Even if it kills 50k more of their own citizens.
 
. . .
loo, Pakistan may support terorrists and let them ram around the country radicalizing youth and raise funds. We are not going to put up with that kind of nonsense elsewhere. Facebook is a respectable service and they also are not going to allow Pakistani or anyone else to support terrorists using their site. Take a hike.
 
.
Me and Facebook and all those who are not Pakistani fail at comprehension. We need to learn why pro terrorism conversation needs to be allowed on India's Facebook, or Facebook period :(

Killing of Kashmiries is terrorism to you yet what India is doing must be divine. I get that now.
 
.
Indians fear that social media could be used to gather people and start an uprising against Indian state.

Facebook, which touted it's service behind the successful Arab spring movement will not be party to the Kashmir cause. Where in the Arab Springs movement the tyrants were Arab monarchs and dictators and Facebook saw to it that they contribute every bit to the cause of overthrowing them are now turning a blind eye to the Indian tyrants oppressing the Kashmiri people for reasons that we all know too well and far too many to get into.
 
.
Killing of Kashmiries is terrorism to you yet what India is doing must be divine. I get that now.
I'm going by the article, the man in question is a terrorist, belonging to a designated terror group and his fanboys are being banned on facebook. Like any other terrorist and their groups, I would support all followers/fanboys being banned too. I'm not here to get into the Kashmir issue, that is India's concern.
 
.
I'm going by the article, the man in question is a terrorist, belonging to a designated terror group and his fanboys are being banned on facebook. I'm not here to get into the Kashmir issue, that is India's concern.

You only like to see the glass half full. His name is Buran Wani and well he is a terrorist according to who, you? India and USA? For the rest specially for the Kashmiries themselves he is a hero.
 
.
You only like to see the glass half full. His name is Buran Wani and well he is a terrorist according to who, you? India and USA? For the rest specially for the Kashmiries themselves he is a hero.

You have to appreciate the fact that to Pakistanis, 26/11 terrorists were freedom fighters and heroes too. Your credibility within the international community to be a true arbiter of who is a terrorist is shot.

I know you have a concept of good terrorist/bad terrorist that look at most terrorist groups as heroes. The man in question is a designated terrorist and his group is a designated terrorist group.- Facebook is private company and if it chooses to ban, then it is their prerogative. One I agree with.
 
.
You have to appreciate the fact that to Pakistanis, 26/11 terrorists were freedom fighters and heroes too. Your credibility within the international community to be a true arbiter of who is a terrorist is shot.

I know you have a concept of good terrorist/bad terrorist that look at most terrorist groups as heroes. The man in question is a designated terrorist and his group is a designated terrorist group.- Facebook is private company and if it chooses to ban, then it is their prerogative. One I agree with.
Doesn't America do the same with the rebels in Syria and other places?
Isn't it hypocritical for America to label who is or is not a terrorist? I mean US backed moderate rebel group Nour al-Din al-Zenki just beheaded a 12 year old boy for being a Syrian Government spy.
Just saying.
 
.
Doesn't America do the same with the rebels in Syria and other places?
Isn't it hypocritical for America to label who is or is not a terrorist? I mean US backed moderate rebel group Nour al-Din al-Zenki just beheaded a 12 year old boy for being a Syrian Government spy.
Just saying.

Dont bother with him. Bunch of hypocrites.
 
.
Doesn't America do the same with the rebels in Syria and other places?
Isn't it hypocritical for America to label who is or is not a terrorist? I mean US backed moderate rebel group Nour al-Din al-Zenki just beheaded a 12 year old boy for being a Syrian Government spy.
Just saying.
No America does not do that, or condone the action of some people who go from group to group. If this video is true and it is indeed a US backed group. Americans of all backgrounds would be horrified and our government will condemn it. You guys on the other hand...
 
.
You only like to see the glass half full. His name is Buran Wani and well he is a terrorist according to who, you? India and USA? For the rest specially for the Kashmiries themselves he is a hero.
HM a banned terrorist organisation bu US EU India and UN so yes he and all members are terrorists. And I believe Fb is an american company.so it has every right to ban terrorists and their supporter
 
.
No America does not do that, or condone the action of some people who go from group to group. If this video is true and it is indeed a US backed group. Americans of all backgrounds would be horrified and our government will condemn it. You guys on the other hand...
Did you seriously say that? I mean here I am in Pakistan thinking that maybe all the information we get might be biased and there you are being so naive (or arrogant) about the atrocities that have been committed in broad daylight by the US backed rebels not just this one but the hundred events done before!
Can anyone comprehend that?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom