What's new

‘Every child is born a Muslim’, says AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi, hits out at Hindu outfits

.
the second part of u r statement implies the same meaning as wat owaisi did... painting a new born kid wth religious color..

Owaisi may have. What I am alluding to is the original statement from which he is deriving his. The term Muslim in literal Arabic means one at peace. So when the statement is really not void if read purely from the literal perspective. Every newborn is a Muslim.. they are at peace.. they are innocent. They have no demons nor any faults in their persona.
 
.
Owaisi may have. What I am alluding to is the original statement from which he is deriving his. The term Muslim in literal Arabic means one at peace. So when the statement is really not void if read purely from the literal perspective. Every newborn is a Muslim.. they are at peace.. they are innocent. They have no demons nor any faults in their persona.
no, when fresh borns, they're just human (who had no say in it's in place of birth, religion, race etc)

I get what you're saying, though.. but then all religions can be interpreted in that way, which is the main problem with them.. righteous fascism, and so much in it o_O
 
.
g2z7z.jpg


Nuff Said!!
 
.
no, when fresh borns, they're just human (who had no say in it's in place of birth, religion, race etc)

I get what you're saying, though.. but then all religions can be interpreted in that way, which is the main problem with them.. righteous fascism, and so much in it o_O

Well yes they can. After all, the original term "hindu" was reserved for the people Alexander encountered across the Indus... to meet the "Sindhus". So essentially the religion that is Hinduism is misleading in its name as well. Essentially, all across the Indus valley and beyond were "Hindus" to the Persians.
Which is why I often use the term Hindu-Muslim to distinguish the Muslims of this area as compared to Arabs.
 
.
Well yes they can. After all, the original term "hindu" was reserved for the people Alexander encountered across the Indus... to meet the "Sindhus". So essentially the religion that is Hinduism is misleading in its name as well. Essentially, all across the Indus valley and beyond were "Hindus" to the Persians.
Which is why I often use the term Hindu-Muslim to distinguish the Muslims of this area as compared to Arabs.
absolutely !

but these people have an ancient way of life (culture) that predates the Abrahamic faiths by a bit, and as with any faith, .. you have these supremacist fascist crazies.. business as usual in the religious world.

but it's not as bad in India yet as it is in Iraq/Syria.. etc
 
. .
Well yes they can. After all, the original term "hindu" was reserved for the people Alexander encountered across the Indus... to meet the "Sindhus". So essentially the religion that is Hinduism is misleading in its name as well. Essentially, all across the Indus valley and beyond were "Hindus" to the Persians.
Which is why I often use the term Hindu-Muslim to distinguish the Muslims of this area as compared to Arabs.

Did you just made me a Hindu ? :o:

Teriii khair nahin ! :mad:

Us Aryans were not Hindus ! :smokin:

My great-great-great-great-great granddaddy came to these lands and used to play chess with your great-great-great-great-great granddaddy usually over a glass of Lassi ! :D

Khair jokes aside; Pakistan is literally at the cross roads of civilization but I don't know why some of us what us to be attuned exclusively to our Indic roots while that is just one aspect of our many identities and even in that sense centuries of co-existing with immigrants from Persia, Central Asia and the Middle East in addition to co-existing with our own diverse cultures that were conceived here and a strong Islamic presence here; we're both Indic, Persian, Central Asian and Indigenous while at the same time belonging to neither of them.

Sometimes I think we're like the Turks; when you ask Turks whether they're Middle Eastern, Central Asian or European.....at times you get a pleasant surprise when they reply 'We're neither of them....We're Turkiye' !

I feel the same way about us; we're neither Arabs nor Indians nor Central Asians nor are we Persians - We're Pakistanis....a melting pot of civilizations !
 
. . .
Nothing wrong with what he said. Unless he starts forcing people to accept Islam and starts some ghar wapsi for them, there is nothing wrong with his statement.
 
. .
If this be the case why did Ulemas insisted on jaziya in the past?

It seems u have some misconception abt jizyah. Its just a form of tax levied upon non-muslim citizens of an Islamic state. Muslims on the other hand have to pay zakat which is a religious obligation. Don't u pay tax to the GOI?

Ulemas always insisted on jizya. Islamic laws don't change with time.
 
.
It seems u have some misconception abt jizya. Its just a form of tax levied upon non-muslim citizens of an Islamic state. Muslims on the other hand have to pay zakat which is a religious obligation. Don't u pay tax to the GOI?

Ulemas always insisted on jizya. Islamic laws don't change with time.
So sweet, eh? 'Just a form of tax'. :D :enjoy:
Mind if we tell Hasina ji to impose the opposite in your state?
 
.
AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi has stirred a controversy with remarks that every child is born a Muslim as he locked horns with right-wing Hindu outfits over their ‘ghar wapsi’ programme.

“Every child is born a Muslim. His parents and society convert him to other religions,” Owaisi said, apparently in a tit-for-tat to hardline Hindu organisations which have been claiming that ancestors of all Indians were Hindus.

“Islam is the real home of all religions. There is no forced conversion in Islam. It is you who need to come home, but we can’t give you money for that,” the Hyderabad MP said on Saturday night on the eve of Eid Milad Un-Nabi, the birth anniversary of Prophet Mohammed. Video footages were carried by TV news channels today.

Owaisi’s statement drew strong reactions from political parties with senior NCP leader and Rajya Sabha member Majeed Memon calling it a “stunt” to get votes.

“It is a stunt by Owaisi for vote-catching. Everybody has the right to follow his religion and convert to other religion if he wants to. What Owaisi has said is not right,” he said.

JD(U) spokesman K C Tyagi described the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen leader as “Muslim edition” of RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat and VHP leader Praveen Togadia.

JD(U) Rajya Sabha member Ali Anwar termed the hardliners and Owaisi as “two sides of the same coin who complement each other and find sustenance from each other”.
“Such activities harm the nation,” he said.

As his comments triggered a row, Owaisi said it is a part of his “belief system” that Islam is the real home of all religions.
“It was a public speech. It was a celebration of Prophet Mohammad. I said these things in a 90-minute speech. It is our belief system.

“In a democracy, I have the permission to put forth my views. You are free to disagree. I am not pushing it down somebody’s throat,” he said.

‘Every child is born a Muslim’, says AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi, hits out at Hindu outfits | The Financial Express

Thappa kaha hai !!

Owaisi may have. What I am alluding to is the original statement from which he is deriving his. The term Muslim in literal Arabic means one at peace. So when the statement is really not void if read purely from the literal perspective. Every newborn is a Muslim.. they are at peace.. they are innocent. They have no demons nor any faults in their persona.
so cute!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom