What's new

European powers reject China's South China Sea claims

Because Vietnamese like you can't read history, they can't even make fake one looks real. Can maps 200 years ago be so well preserved? How can you be as brainless as an Indian? Let me show you the evidence photos of China's sovereignty over the South China Sea before World War II, and see what a map over 50 years should look like.


View attachment 671804
This picture from 1930 was yellowed in less than 100 years.

1: In 1910, Guangdong province dispatched personnel to manage the South China Sea Islands
View attachment 671799



2: South China Sea Observatory (1930)
View attachment 671800



3: A tablet inscribed with the word "Xize island" on the South China Sea Islands in the late Qing Dynasty“
View attachment 671801



4: Officials in charge of managing islands in the South China Sea in the late Qing Dynasty(1893)
View attachment 671802



5: Building monument of South China Sea Island meteorological station (photo in 1931)

View attachment 671803



Do you think 200 year old maps are even newer than less than 100 year old maps?You think that the South China Sea belongs to Vietnam, but you can't take any boundary pillar representing national sovereignty as evidence, or even a picture. This is enough to prove how similar you are to Indians, and you like to take your fantasy as reality.



Before 1974, the Vietnamese governments never challenged any of the sovereignty of China's Paracel Islands. No matter in its government's statement, note, or newspapers, maps and textbooks, it was officially acknowledged that Paracel Islands was China's territory since ancient times.



In June 15, 1956, Yong Wenqian, Vice Minister of foreign affairs of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, met with Li Zhimin, the temporary Ambassador of China's embassy in Vietnam. He solemnly said: "according to Vietnamese information, Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands should belong to China's territory in the history." Li Lu, director of the Asian Affairs Division of Vietnam's Ministry of foreign affairs, further introduced the Vietnamese materials, pointing out: "historically, Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands have belonged to China as early as Song Zhaoshi."



In September 4, 1958, the Chinese government issued a statement declaring that the width of China's territorial sea was 12 nautical miles, and clearly stated: "this provision applies to China, including Paracel Islands. All the territory of the people's Republic of China. On September 6, the people's daily of the central organ of the Vietnamese Labor Party published the Chinese government's statement on territorial waters in its first page. On September 14, Prime Minister Fan Wen Tong of the Vietnamese government sent a note to Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, solemnly stating: "the government of the Vietnamese Democratic Republic recognizes and agrees with the statement of the government of the people's Republic of China on the territorial sea decision of September 4, 1958" and "the government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam respects this decision.".

View attachment 671806
By this logic Germany can claim Moscow and Stalingrad because the Wehrmacht was there.
pls spare the world from fake history.
Germany, France and UK declare chinese claim invalid. They support directly Vietnam Eez waters.


4F1781F6-65B1-457F-BC06-45B888ED1D9C.png
 
. .
Good.

Chinese will never get sovereign control over SCS region. Even China knows how laughable that fantasy is. Regional countries will continue to pass through Chinese claimed SCS and so will the US navy. Chinese have no option but to accept the reality (as they are doing it and will continue to do so).

China should use SCS tensions to gain allys in the region. Win-win for everyone
 
.
Good.

Chinese will never get sovereign control over SCS region. Even China knows how laughable that fantasy is. Regional countries will continue to pass through Chinese claimed SCS and so will the US navy. Chinese have no option but to accept the reality (as they are doing it and will continue to do so).

China should use SCS tensions to gain allys in the region. Win-win for everyone
The Chinese goal was never to gain sovereign control of the SCS. Everyone knows that is impossible with the US bases around East Asia. The goal was to rival in the United States in projecting power into the SCS (basically out-muscle the USN in this region by sheer force) and they are accomplishing it with their massive naval buildup. Of course, the USN will always pass through the region unhindered, but when there is a couple of massive Chinese ships following in your wake, then it becomes a problem. For example, the messages of FONAP operations would be watered down if there were multiple Chinese destroyers trailing the FONAP destroyer.
 
.
stop barking here like idiot dog, :haha:
It's a great pleasure to see you like a groundhog that can't help but scream. Thank you for the joy you've brought us, lovely Vietnamese clown:laugh::laugh::laugh:
timg.gif


Look at it. Does it look like you? You don't have any credible evidence to prove Vietnam's sovereignty over the South China Sea (there are no boundary markers symbolizing sovereignty, no traces of people's life in the past, and even a decent old photo can't be found). The map that you claims to have a history of 200 years is so white, just like the Shanghai subway traffic map I got when I was traveling in Shanghai last week, which further proves your IQ and thinking ability are similar to that of Indians, you are both mentally retarded with an IQ of only 76.:sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:
 
.
It's a great pleasure to see you like a groundhog that can't help but scream. Thank you for the joy you've brought us, lovely Vietnamese clown:laugh::laugh::laugh:
View attachment 671928

Look at it. Does it look like you? You don't have any credible evidence to prove Vietnam's sovereignty over the South China Sea (there are no boundary markers symbolizing sovereignty, no traces of people's life in the past, and even a decent old photo can't be found). The map that you claims to have a history of 200 years is so white, just like the Shanghai subway traffic map I got when I was traveling in Shanghai last week, which further proves your IQ and thinking ability are similar to that of Indians, you are both mentally retarded with an IQ of only 76.:sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:

Study more before you could barking here idiot kid.

Map of Vietnam in 1800s when Nguyen Warlord has taken power in Vietnam. Paracel and Spratly has demonstrated clearly in East Sea Vietnam, there is property of Vietnam. :enjoy: :enjoy: :enjoy:

1600721450669.png
 
.
Study more before you could barking here idiot kid.

Map of Vietnam in 1800s when Nguyen Warlord has taken power in Vietnam. Paracel and Spratly has demonstrated clearly in East Sea Vietnam, there is property of Vietnam. :enjoy: :enjoy: :enjoy:

View attachment 671975

一份200年历史的地图能保存的那么新?非常感谢你进一步提供你是个智商和思维模式类似于印度人的白痴的证据。
How new is a 200 year old map? Thank you very much for further proof that you are an idiot with an IQ and a mindset similar to that of an Indian.:woot::woot:
 
.
Study more before you could barking here idiot kid.

Map of Vietnam in 1800s when Nguyen Warlord has taken power in Vietnam. Paracel and Spratly has demonstrated clearly in East Sea Vietnam, there is property of Vietnam. :enjoy: :enjoy: :enjoy:

View attachment 671975
Map is written in Chinese so it's Chinese territories. Why does Vietinamese not write history or historical documents using Vietnamese ? I dont get it.
 
.
一份200年历史的地图能保存的那么新?非常感谢你进一步提供你是个智商和思维模式类似于印度人的白痴的证据。
How new is a 200 year old map? Thank you very much for further proof that you are an idiot with an IQ and a mindset similar to that of an Indian.:woot::woot:
Map is written in Chinese so it's Chinese territories. Why does Vietinamese not write history or historical documents using Vietnamese ? I dont get it.

In the past Vietnam used Han Chinese to record and writting document, same what Korean and Japan do. 大南 is name of country Vietnam created by Gia Long after 1800 years.

study more idiot chinese. :enjoy::enjoy:
 
.
Taiwans claims for China is the most rediculous of them all. I'm.surprised nobody even calls them out for this. Thank GOD the KNT lost the war to the CCP. Else they would have long have occupied all the SCS islands after WWII and the world would have no choice than to recognise their hold/sovereignty over the region as a fait accompli. The KMT was far more expansionist than the CCP. That's what most people forget.

Just look at their rediculous claim for China. It makes the CCP look like a shy moron. Lol

ridiculous you can't tell the difference of party, government and nation.
 
.
In the past Vietnam used Han Chinese to record and writting document, same what Korean and Japan do. 大南 is name of country Vietnam created by Gia Long after 1800 years.

study more idiot chinese. :enjoy::enjoy:
When I found out that you insisted on a brand-new map came from 200 years ago, I knew that you could basically be identified as moderately retarded with Indian blood. I personally suggest you ask your mother and your father what they did before they got married, and then do paternity testing without telling your father:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
When I found out that you insisted on a brand-new map came from 200 years ago, I knew that you could basically be identified as moderately retarded with Indian blood. I personally suggest you ask your mother and your father what they did before they got married, and then do paternity testing without telling your father:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

You are idiot, I think that your father could be Huno Turkistan, or Mongolian or Manchurian :haha::haha::haha:


The map of China made by Manchuria recently in 1910, its clear that Paracel and Spratly is not related to China. :enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:

1600761619615.png
 
. .
You are idiot, I think that your father could be Huno Turkistan, or Mongolian or Manchurian :haha::haha::haha:


The map of China made by Manchuria recently in 1910, its clear that Paracel and Spratly is not related to China. :enjoy::enjoy::enjoy:

View attachment 672060
I said before that you are mostly of Indian mixed race. Now it seems that you are ready to admit it? Take a look at the text in your picture. "中华民国全图" means "the whole picture of the Republic of China"



Republic of China (1912–1949)



In your narration, the Republic of China, which was founded in 1912, went back to 1910 and drew your fake map, right? An Indian idiot with an IQ of 76? :cheesy: :sarcastic: :woot: :omghaha:

This is the real map of the islands of the South China Sea 100 years ago, including Paracel Islands, Dongsha Island, Spratly Islands and the Sha Sha islands. All the islands and reefs are marked by two names, Chinese and English, and all of them include: "belongs to China".

1468908443727024933.jpg
1468908570529044949.jpg


Vietnamese and Indian idiots like you can't understand the real history without Chinese. You can only satisfy your fantasies by making brand-new "200 year old map" and "1912 map drawn in 1910". I confirm you don't have any credible evidence to prove Vietnam's sovereignty over the South China Sea (there are no boundary markers symbolizing sovereignty, no traces of people's life in the past, and even a decent old photo can't be found).8-)8-):police:
 
Last edited:
.
I said before that you are mostly of Indian mixed race. Now it seems that you are ready to admit it? Take a look at the text in your picture. "中华民国全图" means "the whole picture of the Republic of China"



Republic of China (1912–1949)



In your narration, the Republic of China, which was founded in 1912, went back to 1910 and drew your fake map, right? An Indian idiot with an IQ of 76? :cheesy: :sarcastic: :woot: :omghaha:

This is the real map of the islands of the South China Sea 100 years ago, including Paracel Islands, Dongsha Island, Spratly Islands and the Sha Sha islands. All the islands and reefs are marked by two names, Chinese and English, and all of them include: "belongs to China".

View attachment 672252View attachment 672253

Vietnamese and Indian idiots like you can't understand the real history without Chinese. You can only satisfy your fantasies by making brand-new "200 year old map" and "1912 map drawn in 1910". I confirm you don't have any credible evidence to prove Vietnam's sovereignty over the South China Sea (there are no boundary markers symbolizing sovereignty, no traces of people's life in the past, and even a decent old photo can't be found).8-)8-):police:
Discussions over ancient maps are worthless. Look the maps of the Spaniards and Portuguese, they divided the world into two halfs. By this logic, China belongs to Portugal.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom