What's new

Erasable Web Could Harm Google

Manticore

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
10,115
Reaction score
114
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This year, a small application Snapchat managed to put the fear into Google and even government spooks. The app quickly became popular amongst teenagers and college students as it sent messages, pictures and captions which disappear a few seconds after being opened.

The fears were that such self-destructing made all sorts of things possible, including the end of the power of Google. Although it will probably die out like most teen fads, the enormous success shows that there’s a demand for a type of message which, when opened, can never be seen again.

Snapchat messages can’t be searched, intercepted, stored or found by anyone, and the suggestions are that in 2014 we’ll start to see the rise of the erasable web. Apparently, it would effectively be a more private network, without the fear of every ill-considered photo turning up to haunt your job interviews. Although it might be less useful and impractical as a method to store old pictures or data, other less legally friendly and secure application will emerge.

Today the industry is spouting about how important mass storage on the cloud is, but at the same time it might appear that there’s a new market in getting data off the Internet. How can this harm Google? Today the search engine depends on snuffling as much information as it can on users to serve them up adverts. Once people start sending messages through systems that cannot be monitored and indexed, Google loses a lot of its magic ability. Although the tech giant still will be able to search traditional Internet pages, its personal edge of knowing everything about users will be lost.

With the pressure towards no-tracking and other privacy moves the tech giant is on a back foot fighting a trend away from information collection and into data privacy. Some industry observers predict that 2014 will be the beginning of a war between big data and secret data, and Google may lose this fight.
 
I'm sure there are other NSA type agencies run by American perverts that we've never heard about to date.
 
If the NSA is intercepting communications, then it doesn't matter how transient the information is.

But, yes, Google would be impacted. I think Google knows its bread and butter has a limited lifespan, which is why they are diversifying into all these other businesses.
 
ha!

Google "search engine" and not google as a whole is built upon people looking for stroed information.

So I doubt snapchat will put even a small dent in google's business.

When someone wants to search for a hot bollywood actress, he doesn't search chats let alone private chats (exceptions are Murdochs' Fox companies :) ).

he will search articles, essays, news, blogs everything that "stays around" and doesn't go poof after the 3 seconds of appearing.


OP is senstational yes, but utterly devoid of the deeper understanding of google, web, and snapchat.

All these different things are meant for different purposes.

comparing apples to oranges!



p.s. It is like people posting on PDF and the posts disppear after the first person reads them hahah.

Only mods will be reading stuff then
 
Last edited:
This is silly!

If you don't want Google and other search engines to index your website, you have a simple option to deny it.

The Web Robots Pages

Besides, if Google wanted to capture this data, it's quite trivial to do so. If the information can be delivered, it can be captured. A few seconds is a very long time for a computer program. This is akin to websites blocking right-click on pages to prevent 'hackers' from stealing your images.

If you wish to make private sections for confidential data - why not just require a username / password ?
 
Google Fined for Breaking Spanish Data Law
The tech giant was fined for combining personal data from different Internet services and failing to inform people on data use. This is why Spanish privacy watchdog fined the company for breaking the local data protection legislation when combining personal data from its many different Internet services and failing to inform Google users clearly on how their sensitive data is used.[
195da393-5a9b-452f-a484-2d26efbf6045-460x276.jpeg
[
[]Despite the fact that the €900,000 fine is non-significant for the company with a market capitalization of over $350bn, it still indicates growing concerns across Europe about the amount of personal information gathered in cloud storage services in foreign jurisdictions.[
This is where the information is stored remotely via the worldwide web instead of onsite, leaving people little control over their personal data. In November, the Dutch Data Protection Authority also accused Google of breaking the national data privacy law for the same practices. France moved closer to fining Google in September as well.[
In the meantime, investigations are ongoing in at least three other EU countries, triggered after the company imposed new terms of service on users of all its cloud services – YouTube, Gmail and Google search. Spanish inspections revealed that the company compiled personal data through almost 100 of its services and products, often without providing adequate information about the data that is being collected, reason for that collection and lacking the consent of the owners.[
The tech giant claimed that it had engaged with the Spanish authorities to explain its privacy policy and was going to decide on which action to take after it had the opportunity to fully read the report. The Spanish consumer watchdog claimed users weren’t sufficiently informed that the company filtered the content of their emails and files in order to display proper advertising. Even if Google did so, it used a terminology that was “imprecise, unclear and with generic expressions”.
[/B][/B][/B]

Spain also accused Google of breaking the law by using information it collected for purposes which were unspecified and keeping this data for an indefinite time, sometimes hindering people in their right to erase, access or modify that information. Last month the company agreed to pay a $17 million fine to settle allegations that it secretly tracked Internet users by placing special digital files on the web browsers of their mobile devices.[/SIZE]
 
If the NSA is intercepting communications, then it doesn't matter how transient the information is.

But, yes, Google would be impacted. I think Google knows its bread and butter has a limited lifespan, which is why they are diversifying into all these other businesses.
I hate how Google has changed the internet experience :angry: You go on website and they will throw ads on you related to something random you searched days back. An army of SEO experts posting garbage on internet to get better Google rankings.
 
I hate how Google has changed the internet experience You go on website and they will throw ads on you related to something random you searched days back. An army of SEO experts posting garbage on internet to get better Google rankings.

Adblock mate ! Chrome Web Store - AdBlock

And page rank doesn't have anything to do with google adwords (side panel/top panel whatever).

I can explain the 2.0 algorithm for the new page ranking system but I believe neither you nor me will have the energy or enthusiasm to go through it all :undecided:
 
Back
Top Bottom