End of Commies in Kerala

[SuvarnaTeja]

Errrr .... wrong.

Trupti Desai is a CHRISTIAN. She converted in 2013 and she has fought election and lost on CONgress ticket in maharashtra.

If Brahmins can be Muslims, why can't Brahmins be Christians?

 

[Nityam]

If Brahmins can be Muslims, why can't Brahmins be Christians?

How can brahmins be muslims ?

 

[ThinkLogically]

The communist vermins have arrested KP Sasikala. Isn't she a woman?
https://www.thenewsminute.com/artic...a-after-kp-sasikala-arrested-sabarimala-91704

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

How can brahmins be muslims ?

If you can have ST Christians and Dalit Muslims, why not Brahmin Muslims and Brahmin Christians?

Sir Muhammad Iqbal, widely known as Allama Iqbal was a Muslim Brahmin.

Vijayachander is a Brahmin Christian.

 

[Nityam]

If you can have ST Christians and Dalit Muslims, why not Brahmin Muslims and Brahmin Christians?

Sir Muhammad Iqbal, widely known as Allama Iqbal was a Muslim Brahmin.

Vijayachander is a Brahmin Christian.

Brahmins are the Priests and teachers in Hinduism.

Their equivalent are Mullas and Church Priests.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Brahmins are the Priests and teachers in Hinduism.

Their equivalent are Mullas and Church Priests.

Wrong. It shows your limited/incorrect knowledge.

Prajapati Daksh was the King of the world. Parshuram defeated and killed many kings. Satavahana who ruled during 1CE were Brahmins. Even in the recent history both Rai and Chach Dynasties of Sindh were Brahmin.

Rishis were the original scientists. Vishvamitra fought most of his life fighting to be recognized as one.

Brahmin dynasties[edit]
Following is the list of dynasties ruled by Brahmins in the Indian Subcontinent:

1. The Shunga Empire of Magadha was established by Pushyamitra Shunga.[4]
2. The Kanva dynasty replaced the Shunga Empire in Magadha and ruled in the Eastern regions of India.
3. Satavahana dynasty was a dynasty of vishvamitra gotra that ruled the Deccan region.
4. Shalankayana dynasty of ancient India ruled a part of Coastal Andhra from 300 to 440 CE.
5. Parivrajaka dynasty ruled parts of central India during the 5th and 6th centuries. The kings of this dynasty bore the title Maharaja, and probably ruled as feudatories of the Gupta Empire. The royal family came from a lineage of Brahmins of Bharadvaja Gotra.
6. Kadamba dynasty (345 – 525 CE) was a dynasty that ruled northern Karnataka and the Konkan from Banavasi in present-day Uttara Kannada district.
7. Pallava dynasty {c.285 -905 CE} was a dynasty of the Bharadvaja gotra that ruled Andhra (Krishna-Guntur) and North and Central Tamil Nadu.[5]
8. The Chalukyas of Badami were an indigenous Brahmin family with Kannada as their mother tongue.
9. The Oiniwar Dynasty, based in Mithila were Maithil Brahmins.
10. Vakataka dynasty was a dynasty from the Indian subcontinent that is believed to have extended fromthe southern edges of Malwa and Gujarat in the north to the Tungabhadra River in the south as well as from the Arabian Sea in the west to the edges of Chhattisgarh in the east.
11. Varman dynasty was an ancient dynasty in Assam, alongside Davaka. All the rulers of this dynasty were Kamrupi Brahmins.
12. Brahman dynasty of Sindh was founded by Chach of Alor, later ruled by Chandar of Sindh and Raja Dahir.
13. Bhurshut dynasty was a medieval Hindu dynasty spread across what is now Howrah and Hooghly districts in the Indian state of West Bengal;which was ruled by a royal Brahmin family.
14. Kabul Shahi dynasty belonged to Bali clan of Mohyal Brahmin.
15. Aryacakravarti dynasty which was ruled by Tamil Brahmins.
16. Jaffna Kingdom of Sri Lanka;which was ruled by Tamil Brahmins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Brahmin_dynasties_and_states

 

[Nityam]

Wrong. It shows your limited/incorrect knowledge.

Prajapati Daksh was the King of the world. Parshuram defeated and killed many kings. Satavahana who ruled during 1CE were Brahmins. Even in the recent history both Rai and Chach Dynasties of Sindh were Brahmin.

Since basic premise itself is wrong, its pointless to read the rest of the dribble.

There are TEN Prajapathi and it means "LORD" of creation. Not "king" of earth.

They are, Marichi, Angiras, Atri, Pulastya, Pulaha, Kratu, Vasishtha, Daksha, Bhrigu and Narada.

You clearly know nothing of Hinduism so you should stick to the quran.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Since basic premise itself is wrong, its pointless to read the rest of the dribble.

There are TEN Prajapathi and it means "LORD" of creation. Not "king" of earth.

They are, Marichi, Angiras, Atri, Pulastya, Pulaha, Kratu, Vasishtha, Daksha, Bhrigu and Narada.

You clearly know nothing of Hinduism so you should stick to the quran.

Clutching at straws or running away when confronted with facts?

 

[Nityam]

Clutching at straws or running away when confronted with facts?

Nope, just proved you wrong and ignorant.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Nope, just proved you wrong and ignorant.

Surjewala made the statements at a Brahmin seminar in Haryana’s Kurukshetra. “One of my colleagues asked why is a Brahmin conference being held using Rahul Gandhi's photo and under the Congress party flag and the Tricolour? I said that I will respond to this from this platform one day. Indian National Congress is that party, my friends, in whose blood Brahmin Samaj's DNA is present,” he said.

https://www.dailyo.in/variety/congr...eduled-castes-upper-castes/story/1/26487.html

 

[Nityam]

Surjewala made the statements at a Brahmin seminar in Haryana’s Kurukshetra. “One of my colleagues asked why is a Brahmin conference being held using Rahul Gandhi's photo and under the Congress party flag and the Tricolour? I said that I will respond to this from this platform one day. Indian National Congress is that party, my friends, in whose blood Brahmin Samaj's DNA is present,” he said.

https://www.dailyo.in/variety/congr...eduled-castes-upper-castes/story/1/26487.html

What value does the spokes person of CONgress have ? less or more than pappu ?

Apart from the paid media , who else takes them seriously ? Nobody.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

What value does the spokes person of CONgress have ? less or more than pappu ?

Apart from the paid media , who else takes them seriously ? Nobody.

Congress and Brahmins are pro-Pakistan.

 

[Nityam]

Congress and Brahmins are pro-Pakistan.

How are Brahmins pro-pakistan ?

But here is Khalistani supporters in London shouting "Congress Party Zindabad, Hindustan Murdabad" where RaGa went for Diwali. rest is on you to decide who created Khalistan & why?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1063412689475645442

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

How are Brahmins pro-pakistan ?

But here is Khalistani supporters in London shouting "Congress Party Zindabad, Hindustan Murdabad" where RaGa went for Diwali. rest is on you to decide who created Khalistan & why?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1063412689475645442

It is Brahmins like Maqbool Bhat who started the fight for Kashmir with active support from Karats, Roys, Yechuris of the world.

But here is Khalistani supporters in London shouting "Congress Party Zindabad, Hindustan Murdabad" where RaGa went for Diwali. rest is on you to decide who created Khalistan & why?

Khalistan is anti-Pakistan hence Congress does not support it.

 

[Nityam]

It is Brahmins like Maqbool Bhat who started the fight for Kashmir with active support from Karats, Roys, Yechuris of the world.

Maqbool Bhat is a Muslim, not a brahmin.

Karat, Roys and Yechuri are all Atheists and Communists, though they are all from the brahmin caste.

Khalistan is anti-Pakistan hence Congress does not support it.

pakistan is the main sponsor of khalistan, but why are they supporting CONgress ?

Bit strange, don't you think ?