Dr. Norman Finkelstein Blasts Zionist playing Holocaust card

[Bratva]

Sorry for the provocative title but the speaker in video (youtube clip) who himself is a jew makes a compelling argument. Interesting video. Do watch

@Solomon2

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Get ready for the Israeli supports calling him a self hating Jew.

 

[AUz]

He is one of the most awesome human beings I've ever seen in public life.

Watch all his debates. He is amazing. The level of knowledge this man has on Israel-Palestine issue is unmatched. He gave presentations at the United Nations regarding the issue...

Israelis sh!t their pants after listening his name. They know that the man will crush them by his superior scholarship...

 

[Solomon2]

"No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts, no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate, without taking the time to carefully compare his claims with the sources he cites"

link

 

[Bratva]

"No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts, no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate, without taking the time to carefully compare his claims with the sources he cites"

link

what this has got to do with what he said in video? Or you're acting like a crying lady now ?

 

[AUz]

"No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts, no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate, without taking the time to carefully compare his claims with the sources he cites"

link

LMFAO!

Yes, a guy with Phd from one of the top five universities of the world should not be taken seriously. A guy with revolutionary work in the field should not be taken seriously (Remember, it was his phd desertion that finally buried the myths surrounding around Palestine--and scholars as far as England published his works and appreciated his brilliant scholarship)..A guy who the top most SCHOLARS of the field---like Noam Chomsky---appreciate should not be taken seriously. Why? Because one Israeli website says so

 

[Solomon2]

Guys, Norman Finkelstein's professionalism and anti-Zionist monologues and dialogues have been debunked numerous times. If you want to see the evidence you'll look for it; if you don't want to see it, you won't, right?

 

[Jungibaaz]

"No facts alleged by Finkelstein should be assumed to be really facts, no quotation in his book should be assumed to be accurate, without taking the time to carefully compare his claims with the sources he cites"

link

Ask Raul Hilberg and he might disagree with you. Though, I'm sure that doesn't matter to you, if it's not pushing your agenda, it's irrelevant, if it's pushing against it, defame, defame, defame.

Guys, Norman Finkelstein's professionalism and anti-Zionist monologues and dialogues have been debunked numerous times. If you want to see the evidence you'll look for it; if you don't want to see it, you won't, right?

Name me one scholar who's written anything on the related topic and hasn't been blasted by the other side even once.

 

[Solomon2]

Ask Raul Hilberg...Name me one scholar -

Why are you counting scholars rather than examining scholarship?

 

[Bratva]

Guys, Norman Finkelstein's professionalism and anti-Zionist monologues and dialogues have been debunked numerous times. If you want to see the evidence you'll look for it; if you don't want to see it, you won't, right?

Why are you derailing the topic constantly instead of commenting on the actual subject of topic i.e the video ?

 

[Solomon2]

Why are you derailing the topic constantly instead of commenting on the actual subject of topic i.e the video ?

What is the point to commenting upon the video past pointing out that its speaker has a long-confirmed reputation for spewing lies? If there's a specific issue you're interested in, why not address it in another thread?

 

[Bratva]

What is the point to commenting upon the video past pointing out that its speaker has a long-confirmed reputation for spewing lies? If there's a specific issue you're interested in, why not address it in another thread?

Judging the audience and the place where he was invited to speak, Only an ignorant would raise fingers on his reputation.

 

[Jungibaaz]

Why are you counting scholars rather than examining scholarship?

Oh... I'm sorry, were you not doing the same load of crap, talking the same way about Finkelstein's work?
Trying to poke holes in his credibility by quoting criticism from other scholars.

What is the point to commenting upon the video past pointing out that its speaker has a long-confirmed reputation for spewing lies? If there's a specific issue you're interested in, why not address it in another thread?

That is rich coming from the same member who called the likes of Robert Spencer, 'a scholar'.

 

[Solomon2]

Judging the audience and the place where he was invited to speak, Only an ignorant would raise fingers on his reputation.

Unclear.

Oh... I'm sorry, were you not doing the same load of crap, talking the same way about Finkelstein's work?

You don't judge by numbers but by evaluating quality. True democrats don't put their faith in princes.

That is rich coming from the same member who called the likes of Robert Spencer, 'a scholar'.

Please point out where and when I did that, thanks.

 

[Jungibaaz]

Please point out where and when I did that, thanks.

Right..... here.

Very first line, you quoted my post about Robert Spencer and Pam Geller.

I think even mentioning his name in the same post as another scholar would be an insult.

R.S. is a serious scholar but I think he likes neither Muslims nor Islam. Pamela is paranoid. I haven't figured out which one uses the other more and I'm not going to bother.

shoot. Either that RS is Spencer or Rana Sanaullah.