What's new

Does Pakistan have a saviour in Imran Khan?

Rig Vedic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
0
A nice article that discusses the social background of many Pakistani leaders ...

----------------------------------------
Does Pakistan have a saviour in Imran Khan?

Oxford-educated Imran does not believe in evolution, and this helps with those who think of him as their saviour

Aakar Patel

Imran Khan might be made prime minister of Pakistan by that nation’s powerful military. If this is so, he will be the first Pashtun to lead the country. General Ayub Khan, dictator between 1958 and 1969, is seen as a Pathan but spoke Hindko, not Pakhtu.

Having spent his life in the upper-class Lahore neighbourhood of Zaman Park, Imran actually doesn’t speak much Pakhtu either. But he is seen as an unbending Pathan by his followers.

3856CD7A-8089-4A37-902E-7EAE2DD53EE7ArtVPF.gif

Photo: Aamir Qureshi/AFP

Oxford-educated Imran does not believe in evolution, and this helps with those who think of him as their saviour. He married a Jewess, whom he let go of when his ambitions required him to be conservative. He is favoured by the army because he wants peace with the Taliban. The army is done fighting them, and also wants compromise. The other reason is that Pakistan’s economy has sunk. Pakistan’s generals are worried about a reduced share of defence spending and believe that a clean politician is all that’s needed to revive the economy. (...)

Imran is a Pashtun from the Niazi tribe that is actually quite urban. The Pashtuns don’t have caste and in that sense are different from South Asians. However, other Pashtuns don’t have a high opinion of the Niazis. Another famous Niazi was A.A.K. “Tiger” Niazi (...) In Pakistan, the Punjabi is enamoured of the Pathan because he represents the extreme end of honour on the subcontinent.

It is true that the Pashtun has honour (in Zanjeer, Pathan Pran offers one hair of his moustache as collateral to a bania moneylender—who declines, saying the Pathan’s word is sufficient). (...)

The man whose votes the army wants to give Imran is Nawaz Sharif. Though Sharif’s fans call him the lion of Punjab, his father was from Kashmir and the family name was Butt. This makes Sharif a Brahmin because Butt is the unfortunate Punjabi pronunciation of Bhatt.

The word “Sharif” is to show high birth, and Muslims of upper caste call themselves Ashraf, from the same sh-r-f root as Sharif. In his case it is true, as we have seen. Sharif is seen by Pakistani columnists as being not very bright. This may be so, but he is a moderate and relatively sensible leader, attracted to compromise because of his years running his father’s business, an iron foundry.

The “Sharif/Ashraf” claim is repeated in the name of the general who overthrew him, Musharraf. I’m not sure if it’s valid in his case. Many Indian Muslims claim high birth and if we were to tally all of our Syeds and Sheikhs there would be 10 times as many Arabs of noble birth here than in all Arabia.

Pervez Musharraf was not intellectual. He sent his men to die in Kargil without thinking his plan through. Their deaths were in vain, for India’s position was seen with sympathy from then on, and that is a terrible outcome for such sacrifice from jawans. But Musharraf rejected blame and fired Sharif to become dictator. Governance made Musharraf pragmatic. It knocked sense into his head, as they say. Once he saw what a ghastly place Pakistan has become, he ended the jihad in Kashmir, something which India hasn’t given him proper credit for. These days he is a sad figure, as all former dictators are. He is paying Rs 12.5 lakh a month to the Washington lobby firm Advantage, initially for an eight-month contract, in the hope that the US will install him again. Prudently, Advantage insisted on taking the first two months’, and the last month’s, fee in advance.

To return to what we discussed earlier, there are quite a few upper-caste converts to Islam in north India. Allama Iqbal was also from a family of Brahmins. The Hurriyat Conference, haters of secularism, is actually full of Brahmins, from families converted in the last few centuries. One of them is Abdul Gani Bhat, whom reporters love for his colourful quotes, but he’s unhinged.

The most prominent Brahmin of Pakistan was its most charismatic leader. The name Bhutto is also derived from Bhat, and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s father was of Brahmin stock. More about him later. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was messianic and unstable. He was cold enough to have the police brutalize his cleverest follower, old J.A. Rahim. And he was sensitive enough to weep at the sight of labourers breaking boulders with their hands. We know this from the memoirs of his leftist finance minister Mubashir Hasan (The Mirage of Power: An Inquiry into the Bhutto Years, 1971-77). Hasan spends hundreds of pages detailing legislation and process and gossip, but omits to tell us he sat in a cabinet that apostatized the Ahmedis. There’s no mention of this constitutional amendment at all. Hasan is afraid of being killed by his countrymen, true, but then why keep pretending to be a liberal?

In his memoirs (Working with Zia: Pakistan’s Power Politics 1977-1988), General K.M. Arif wrote about how Bhutto spent his last hour in jail before being hanged. He lost his bearings, and started sweeping the floor. Then he demanded hot water for a shave (“I don’t want to die looking like a bearded mullah”) and then began weeping, too distracted, he admitted, to be able to write his will.

The man who hanged Bhutto, Zia-ul-Haq, was from the non-martial caste of Arain peasants of Jalandhar. He was more wily than his warrior generals, and gave Pakistanis what they wanted: full-dress Sharia with all the flogging of drunks, amputation of thieves, beheading of murderers and stoning of adulteresses that Islam promises its faithful.

He is a hero, and trucks across Pakistan still bear his likeness and that of Ayub. Many Pakistanis yearn for these punishments, which remain on the books, though not carried out by a frightened judiciary. In that sense the Taliban are only demanding implementation of Pakistan’s constitution. Bhutto was born to Junagadh’s prime minister Sir Shahnawaz Bhutto from his second wife, a Hindu of the scheduled castes. The petty Muslim aristocracy never let him forget that, and it is why Bhutto hated Hindus so much.

There’s an excellent story in Sherbaz Khan Mazari’s memoirs (A Journey to Disillusionment) about Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri sitting on a chair and repeatedly turning his face away from Bhutto when, as president of Pakistan, Bhutto tried to speak to him to offer him the job of chief minister of Balochistan. As a “higher” noble, Marri could not accept a job from a lower one.


In the memoirs of one of his chamchas Rafi Raza (Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Pakistan 1967-1977), there is a photograph that is quite revealing. Bhutto and his gang are dressed in dark Nehru jackets, but with flashy, braided epaulettes, Bhutto’s being flashiest of all. It is a head waiter’s costume, but they probably thought they appeared grand in a martial culture that loves uniforms. Another thing I found strange about Bhutto was a line in Benazir’s memoirs (Daughter of the East). She writes after his death of going through his wardrobe and smelling his favourite perfume, Shalimar.

Made by Guerlain, it is actually a scent for women.

Benazir Bhutto was the best leader Pakistan ever had, including Muhammad Ali Jinnah. She had matured in exile under Musharraf and would have tried to free Pakistan from the embrace of Al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda struck first and with her went Pakistan’s last chance. I’m not sure what the provenance of Asif Ali Zardari’s name is. Like Bhutto, he is a Sindhi-speaking Baloch feudal, though a Shia, like Jinnah. Baloch are tribals, but different from the Pashtuns in a vital sense. The Baloch surrenders to his tribal chief and is not independent and individualistic, like the Pashtun is.

Under 1% of the Pakistan army is made of Baloch, and they are known to be deserters, running back to the village. That does not mean they are cowards.

When Baloch leader Nawab Akbar Bugti rebelled, his followers fell with him in a missile strike ordered by Musharraf. This killing triggered yet another round of Balochi militancy, and has kept the army busy there because of a dictator’s mindlessness.
(....)

Aakar Patel is a director with Hill Road Media.

Does Pakistan have a saviour in Imran Khan? - Columns - livemint.com
 
.
A nice article that discusses the social background of many Pakistani leaders ...

Imran Khan might be made prime minister of Pakistan by that nation’s powerful military. If this is so, he will be the first Pashtun to lead the country.

When did that happen?huh
 
.
Apparently Imran Khan is a Shermankhel Niazi from Mianwali who considers himself a Pashtun, but speaks Seraiki.

When did that happen?huh

Ayub Khan was said to be a Hindko speaker.
 
.
I don't know why I have a feeling that Imran Khan will be another Barack Obama.

Although I don't wish so. I wish Imran Khan turns out too be what everyone expects him to but I have little hope.
 
. . .
I don't know why I have a feeling that Imran Khan will be another Barack Obama.

Although I don't wish so. I wish Imran Khan turns out too be what everyone expects him to but I have little hope.

I dont think he will make it to the PM house..
 
. .
Great Expectations

Imran Khan seems to be the flavour of the moment in Pakistan. The question that we need to address is are we expecting too much of him?

History has taught us that politicians in opposition are able to take positions which are impossible when in power. If they are wrong their posturing is forgotten about very quickly because there are no consequences. If they are right their supporters never fail to mention it. In power a mistake is never forgotten as there are always consequences. There may also be institutionalised constraints. Its all very well complaining about for example inflation when in opposition. However when elected the cure for inflation may be the pain to the electorate ie a freeze on public salaries.

When Benazir was elected the first time many had expectations which in due course gave way to disappointment. This is not something which is limited to Pakistan it happens in other countries too. After Bush there were great expectations of Obama not just in America but around the world. A black son of a moslem father with a cosmopolitan non standard american background. Surely Obama would lead to improved relations with the moslem countries etc. After his election victory whilst he was president elect the Israelis bombed Gaza and signed all kinds of deals with the Bush administration in the anticipation that Obamas administration might show a more even hand between the Israelis and Palestinians. Obama won the Noble peace prize very shortly after becoming President. In hind site it would appear he won that not because of any actions that he took but purely on the basis of expectations. However over time we have learned that he is more Bush than Bush. All be it a sophisticated version of Bush. His policies for example with Palestine or Pakistan are more destructive to the same people that had great hopes of him.

Imran Khan has had opportunities before. During Musharaff’s rule he could easily have bended to Musharaff and used that five or six years in the same way that Shariff did with Zia or in the way that Bhutto senior did with Ayub and build an effective party machinery which in due course could have challenged for power independently. Was it his conscience that did not allow him to work with Musharaff or was it his naivity. In power at least he could have had some influence on the levers of powers. Either option is worrying. We don't need a naive leader and we don't need a leader that is tied up in principle so much that he cant take advantage of opportunities.

Imran is inexperienced and at time appears naive. Lets face it he is anti American and anti corruption two rallying calls to the people of Pakistan. But which pakistani isnt anti american or anti corruption these days? The masses are on his side on both these issues. People seem to be going towards him by default rather than choice. Pakistan has had two PPP administrations with Benazir at the helm and a third PPP administration with Zardari at the helm all failures. Pakistan has also had its failures with PNA(N) with Shariff at the helm. Both parties although claiming to be democratic are the personal fifedoms of two families and the antithesis of democracy in that they have no internal democracy. Simply Pakistanis don't really have much choice.

In Imran we have an opportunity. There seems to be a suggestion by people opposing Imran that the establishment in the form of the ISI is supportive ofImran. Imran is at great pains to suggest that this is not the case. The writer would suggest that there is absolutely nothing wrong in the establishment in particular ISI and army having some influence on Imran. Why is it wrong that a political leader, other agencies and the public have similar views?

One man no matter how good can only do so much. Imran needs to recruit a good team around him, he needs to create a political machine preferably a democratic political party which elects its leaders through its members. Imran needs to work with the ISI and other agencies for the betterment of Pakistan. In fact I would be happier if Imran was used as figurehead rather than held all the power all by himself.

Lets hope for the best and support him. But lets not have too many expectations.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/national-political-issues/145263-great-expectations.html#post2369977
 
.
If he can pull out Pakistan from extremists and Mullah's then he really will be savior .His foreign education and soft corner for India are signs i think
 
.
If he can pull out Pakistan from extremists and Mullah's then he really will be savior .His foreign education and soft corner for India are signs i think

oh shut up with same old crap,

there are 18 crore people living in Pakistan so all of them are mullahs and extremists? go to india and you will have same problem too, there are religious extremists too, so dont try to be smart ***.
 
. . .
Guys, our next leader is going to be from Pakistan. He is not going to come from Heaven.

The point is don't compare Imran Khan with Prophets.

Compare him with the alternatives i.e. Zardari and Nawaz.

Compared with those two, Imran Khan is looking better everyday.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom