What's new

Does India Harbour Territorial Ambitions Towards Pakistan or Not?

Yes but in this context Australia also means India...seems there was a name change that I was not informed about...India is now known as Australia.

The only difference in the context of the discussion is that while neither India nor Australia have territorial designs on Pakistan, Pakistani nukes can reach India but not Australia. While nukes from the Indian and Australian mainlands can both hit Pakistan. Just to even things out.
 
. .
Of course you do!
What a lot of crap! How long have you lived in this country? Of course there is an Eastern Australia. Idiot!

May be you need to share your learned book with rest of Australians as none other than you know that there is an Eastern Australia. There are Eastern States and I have written it 3rd time for your education. There is AEST which is Australian Eastern Standard Time but it is shared across THREE STATES. There is NO EASTERN AUSTRALIA as a territory or state. Show me where it is written on a map.

Eastern states of Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not sure if I am talking to a child but in case I am, happy learning kid.
 
.
Not really. You see a WW necessitates the inclusion of other great powers in a war.

In Pakistan's case, no one else is going to join a war for Pakistan.

And if anything, Pakistan is probably one of the rare issues on which most traditionally warring powers actually agree.
 
. . .
The only difference in the context of the discussion is that while neither India nor Australia have territorial designs on Pakistan, Pakistani nukes can reach India but not Australia. While nukes from the Indian and Australian mainlands can both hit Pakistan. Just to even things out.

Actually, Australia is quite capable of building its own nuclear weapons had it the will to do so. We have 29% of the world's uranium reserves, the world's largest, we have a large enough experimental reactor to produce plutonium, and we have the technical expertise to put it together.
 
.
India has long played its proxy wars to take Pakistan areas but sadly for them every time they suffer humaliating defeat.
really? Its Pakistan which is trying to get back J&K after three defeats in open war.
 
.
Actually, Australia is quite capable of building its own nuclear weapons had it the will to do so. We have 29% of the world's uranium reserves, the world's largest, and we have the technical expertise to put it together.

Agreed. You and Canada are voluntary non nuclear states choosing to remain under an American nuclear umbrella.
 
. .
Did Gen. Mention Indian invasion invasion of Indian Forces into Bangladesh? Was that a territorial breach? India didn't hold on to Bangladesh because people of Bangladesh weren't pro India and it would've been a manana if they had.

Its like saying India doesn't want to eat Pakistan's arm but it wouldn't mind if it is cut. India does have territorial ambitions and they captured Sir Creek which is a Pakistani territory under Indian Occupation. What else is called territorial ambitions?

Pakistan and India has fought 3 wars, in one of the wars India invaded East Pakistan militarily. Is misunderstood statement of one militry person going to give India a clean chit? Don't tell me you are that thinly opinionated.
each time it was pakistan which has startted the war !!
 
. . .
That's the $64,000 question! India would be crazy to have territorial designs on Pakistan.
PA needs a "INDIAN" threat to maintain prominence with in Pakistan. After so many debacles yet people hardly see criticizing their army for leading their country down the path of Islamic extremism.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom