What's new

Does Forces Goal-2030 could improve bd military as a whole ?

sir you need to learn abut modern war scenarios . its not like that an army is most important but airforce is something else .what if i told you air force can destroy a country which you build in last 40 years in 4 hours without a single foot solder on ground ? without air support even if you have 1 billion solders air force will wipe them out its not ww2 era . you have to re -read abut modern air weapons . from any personal to bunker buster from cluster bombs to anti radiation missiles from stand off weapons to air to air missiles even nukes .air force i answer of everything .an airforce can fight without army but an army can not stand without airforce
:rofl: I love it when you two discuss amongst yourselves. :rofl:
indian army crossed burmese border again i heard...
 
.
indian army crossed burmese border again i heard...

These Myanmarese primitives are not smart enough to realise the game Indians are playing.

The same Indians that are racist against NE people are showing them "brotherly" love.
:lol:
 
Last edited:
.
No India wont have 1000 fighters by 2030 - 600-700
is more realistic

Sure. In the present scenario, even our Naval Air Arm has far more fourth generation fighters than your AF. The situation in 2030 will not be different, with India operating at least 3-4 aircraft carriers.

Have you not read Indian history?

Indians have been slaves for most of the last 1000
years. If it was not for numbers, they would be a pushover.

Yet you needed an Indian intervention to save your rear. Stop pulling out imaginary theories of racial superiority.
 
.
Sure. In the present scenario, even our Naval Air Arm has far more fourth generation fighters than your AF. The situation in 2030 will not be different, with India operating at least 3-4 aircraft carriers.

The RELATIVE gap will decline massively and that is what matters.

Realistic numbers for IAF and IN fighters please
 
.
indian army crossed burmese border again i heard...

We have agreements with Myanmar on dealing with insurgents.

The RELATIVE gap will decline massively and that is what matters.

Realistic numbers for IAF and IN fighters please

Sure, the Indian Naval Air Arm (not the air force) has a superiority of 5:1 when it comes to the number of fourth generation aircraft.

The relative gap is not going to decline as long as your defense spending remains around 1% of GDP.
 
.
@MilSpec Is your R&R due? Go through the thread if too stressed,

@nair you too .. although seeing your dp, I assume you would be a very content man
 
.
We have agreements with Myanmar on dealing with insurgents.



Sure, the Indian Naval Air Arm (not the air force) has a superiority of 5:1 when it comes to the number of fourth generation aircraft.

The relative gap is not going to decline as long as your defense spending remains around 1% of GDP.

Why? Myanmar can't deal with insurgents inside their own territory?
 
.
We have agreements with Myanmar on dealing with insurgents.



Sure, the Indian Naval Air Arm (not the air force) has a superiority of 5:1 when it comes to the number of fourth generation aircraft.

The relative gap is not going to decline as long as your defense spending remains around 1% of GDP.

BD spends around 1.7% of GDP when arms imports are taken into account.

I know that India will also increase it's defence budget, but BD is growing from an almost non-existent base
and will be buying large numbers of modern weapons. A lot of India's current arsenal will be obsolete by 2030
and so the investment in them will be lost.

The relative gap will decrease when BD has 160 4+/5 gen fighters by 2030. It only has 8 4 gen fighters now.
Whether you like it or not, BD will match Indian forces in NE by 2030.
 
.
These Myanmarese primitives are not smart enough to realise the game Indians are playing.

The same Indians that are racist against NE people are showing them "brotherly" love.
:lol:

You're too much of a slave race to understand that diplomacy is a 5 player game in Myanmar. Did you notice that Aung San Suu Kyi went to China but the figurehead president went to India? Diplomacy is more than just trying not to become an Indian satellite you know.

indian army crossed burmese border again i heard...
You really must post these things you hear.
 
.
Have you not read Indian history?

Indians have been slaves for most of the last 1000
years. If it was not for numbers, they would be a pushover.


Included your forefathers too. Need I draw attention to your roots??? Atleast some of the slave Indians maintained their identity. You exemplify the rest 'non-slave'?
 
.
You're too much of a slave race to understand that diplomacy is a 5 player game in Myanmar. Did you notice that Aung San Suu Kyi went to China but the figurehead president went to India? Diplomacy is more than just trying not to become an Indian satellite you


Why do you think that Indians here support Myanmar against BD?
They are just trying to create a rift between the two countries for their own interests.
If Myanmar would not try to push their Rohingyas out then BD would have no problems with it.

There could be a lot of mutually beneficial trade between BD and Myanmar - for example Myanmar could
export a lot of agricultural products to BD and BD could supply medicines and electronics at competitive prices.
 
.
This whole thread is summed up by the title:

Does Forces Goal-2030 could improve bd military as a whole ?

So terrible. Makes me wonder if this bd major guy is an alternate account of that other paddy field-sounding guy @bdslph
 
. . .
@MilSpec : here comes good-old dude to negative rate me yet again, I think all my negative ratings have come
from you and you only. Enjoy this little bit of power you have on an anonymous Internet forum.

:lol:

PS So when are you going to negatively rate @Nilgiri or does he get away with it as he is Indian? He has said way worse things than I have done.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom