Do you consider ISIL a Sunni or Pro Sunni group in Iraq ?

[The SiLent crY]

I don't support terrorist Wahabbis but saying those elections are legitimate is an insult to humanity.

So , You think both elections were fake ?

Let me ask you a question , If rebels had people's support then why didn't they accept to have an election there ?

 

[mahatir]

LOLLL, So you think that Assad election was democratic?!!!

presstv addict dont expect much from him , did you watch spanish slaughter house yesterday ?

So , You think both elections were fake ?

Let me ask you a question , If rebels had people's support then why didn't they accept to have an election there ?

what elections man , get real , is this for takiya or your actually like that ?

 

[Azizam]

So , You think both elections were fake ?

Let me ask you a question , If rebels had people's support then why didn't they accept to have an election there ?

Of course both elections were fake. The problem with rebels is that they are not represented by right people and terrorists have taken them over. The real people who can actually represent the opposition were kicked out in early stage with terrorists ruling it nowadays. I assume some Sunni people have chosen to take side of violent groups while the rest have given up support for any group.

In the case of Syria I think Assad is the best option they have right now since there's no united opposition or any sort of opposition for that matter. As for Iraq, Maliki should immediately go.

 

[The SiLent crY]

presstv addict dont expect much from him , did you watch spanish slaughter house yesterday ?



what elections man , get real , is this for takiya or your actually like that ?

Like what ?!

Why are you changing the subject and attack me ? If you have the truth , post here .

Rebels in Syria refused an election and demanded Assad to leave with out letting people to choose .

In Iraq the story is clear , Pro Saddam party and their followers who are not even considered as a minority want to take power or bring civil war in order not to let situation in Iraq be normal and stable.

As for Iraq, Maliki should immediately go.

Why should he go ?

Wasn't he and his party elected by majority ?!

 

[Azizam]

Like what ?!

Why are you changing the subject and attack me ? If you have the truth , post here .

Rebels in Syria refused an election and demanded Assad to leave with out letting people to choose .

In Iraq the story is clear , Pro Saddam party and their followers who are not even considered as a minority want to take power or bring civil war in order not to let situation in Iraq be normal and stable.



Why should he go ?

Wasn't he and his party elected by majority ?!

What elections? Those are elections just for the name. Maliki is an American installed puppet.

 

[rmi5]

I think if rebels were sure they could win the election they would have taken part .

I don't support terrorist Wahabbis but saying those elections are legitimate is an insult to humanity.

presstv addict dont expect much from him , did you watch spanish slaughter house yesterday ?

Uhh, You mean the Netherland-Spain?!!!
Yeah, Matadors slaughtered thoroughly.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

In both Syria and Iraq people voted in favor of current governments and yet some people claim none of them were democratic because the ones they wanted didn't win .

Even the Russian Foreign Secretary, who support Assad, consider the elections a joke.

 

[ghoul]

I consider them a pro-satanic group. Their leader might as well be possessed by Satan.

 

[waz]

They kill Sunni Sufis....How can they be considered Sunnis when they are Kwarij.

I consider them a pro-satanic group. Their leader might as well be possessed by Satan.

Bro these devils are our sworn enemy. They are the filth that want the destruction of mazars, zikir, milad and so forth. They should be killed without mercy.

 

[jamahir]

Even the Russian Foreign Secretary, who support Assad, consider the elections a joke.

as syrian lion has said time and again, if the people didn't support bashar, he wouldn't last a day as president.

you have to accept it, he is the people's choice as leader to lead syria through the nato-sponsored atrocities.

edit : didn't notice it that richleau posted that comment in 2014... but anyway, my reply is still valid.

 

[Superboy]

Yes because there is widespread support for ISIS in Sunni places like Anbar province and Mosul.

 

[elszADaQ]

They kill Sunni Sufis....How can they be considered Sunnis when they are Kwarij.



Bro these devils are our sworn enemy. They are the filth that want the destruction of mazars, zikir, milad and so forth. They should be killed without mercy.

Can dogs of hell fire even be considered human beings let alone followers of Muhammad SAW who's sent as a mercy, if they have no humanity at all? The vast majority of Syrian Muslims in the Syrian opposition groups follow the Shafi'i and Hanafi schools of thought. But nowadays any oppressor like Assad can name Muslims Wahhabis to portray them as dangerous, and then mindlessly kill innocent people without consequence.

Syrian Islamic scholar Sheiikh Muhammad al-Yaqoubi

 

[Militant Atheist]

Interesting. Majority of Iranians voted no, and Sunnis themselves yes. That is really saying something. Haha!

 

[Serpentine]

500'000 sunnis left their homes because of them, i dont think they are acting in sunni interest.

I still remember the videos coming out of people cheering for them and holding a welcome party for them. They may feel the remorse now, but doesn't change the reality.

The region is already in sectarian conflict. Because of a multitude of reasons
If the question is about Iraq than its because of the sectarian policies of al-Maliki.

Always trying to save face and bringing excuses.

Saddam killed thousand times more Shias during his rule, but they never joined one single terrorist group, they didn't blow up themselves in streets and markets of Sunni populated areas and they didn't behead/crucify Sunnis in open ceremonies. These are the reality, even if they are bitter for you.

 

[Hiptullha]

Saddam killed thousand times more Shias during his rule, but they never joined one single terrorist group, they didn't blow up themselves in streets and markets of Sunni populated areas and they didn't behead/crucify Sunnis in open ceremonies. These are the reality, even if they are bitter for you.

There were Shia resistance groups during Saddam's time but that's not the point I'm going to make.
With the rise of Sunni militancy, there were plenty of backers who were involved in the Global Islamic Militancy Movement who were veterans in the art of terror and flocked to Iraq where they brought along with them not only money, but new terror tactics. The character of resistance and opposition had fundamentally changed and the Islamists were violent in character.