What's new

Do bank analysts dream of electric cars?

LeveragedBuyout

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
60
Country
United States
Location
United States
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/08/28/1947761/do-bank-analysts-dream-of-electric-cars/

Do bank analysts dream of electric cars?
Izabella Kaminska 20 comments |

Yes, yes they do.

At least the ones from UBS, who are out this week with a huge report on solar, batteries and electric cars and their capacity to re-shape the current electric system in the next few years.

Case in point, these charts:

Screen-Shot-2014-08-27-at-17.34.03-590x234.png



Screen-Shot-2014-08-27-at-17.24.47-590x215.png


And here’s a really good one showing the probable rate of electrical vehicle adoption in Europe:

Screen-Shot-2014-08-27-at-17.35.30.png


The analysts’ most controversial point is that solar really is on the edge of becoming economically viable (without government subsidies) due in part to recent complementary developments in battery and electric vehicle technology.

From the report (our emphasis):

Solar panels and batteries will be disruptive technologies. Solar is at the edge of being a competitive power generation technology. The biggest drawback has been its intermittency. This is where batteries and electric vehicles (EVs) come into play. Battery costs have declined rapidly, and we expect a further decline of >50% by 2020. By then, a mass segment EV will have almost the same sticker price as a combustion engine car. But it will save up to €2,000 per year on fuel cost, hence, it will begin to pay off almost immediately without any meaningful upfront “investment”. This is why we expect a rapidly growing penetration with EVs, in particular in countries with high fossil fuel prices.

Thanks to EV-driven economies of scale, we also expect the cost of stationary batteries to drop c50% by 2020. Based on our proprietary analysis, battery storage should become financially attractive for family homes when combined with a solar system (and an EV). As a consequence, we expect transformational changes in the utility and auto sectors, which we discuss in this report.

Here in any case is how the cashflow from a collective investment in solar, battery and EV capex should break down:

Screen-Shot-2014-08-27-at-17.43.55-590x248.png


Understandably, no report on solar, batteries and electric cars can go without a reference to those pioneering the technology on the automative side. According to UBS, that’s BMW and Tesla, both of whom are radically changing the way consumers think about electric due to their premium offerings:

We think this negligible EV penetration is about to change. Premium brands, such as Tesla or BMW, rather than ‘volume’ brands, are leading in terms of technology, but also in terms of sales, as the incremental cost of ‘going electric’ is providing less of a hurdle for premium brand buyers. In H1 14, BMW sold 5,406 i3 versus Renault selling 4,756 Zoe. For the period 2015-20, we expect growth will initially be dictated by regulation and OEMs needing to adopt electrification to meet the CO2 reduction targets set across major auto markets. Even assuming the efficiency of ICE engines continues to improve, we estimate CO2 compliance will require global sales of 3.2m EV by 2020-21, or a 140%-plus CAGR.

But there’s also the impact of decentralised power generation to consider. This, the analysts say, is going to be a big win for those companies that provide the infrastructure to distribute and control the energy flow, manage the smart grid and control the information flow from smart devices.

As suppliers of transmission and/or distribution equipment and software this is positive for Siemens, ABB and Schneider, in our view. In addition, decentralised power generation by renewable sources such as solar power increases the need for software and hardware to control and optimise demand/supply, again benefitting the three companies. The smart grid is to a great extent about information management. You gather live data on the ebbs and flows of electricity in the grid and use software to optimise the allocation of the energy in the system.

Those who used to be price takers will, thanks to the smartening up of the grid, in other words become price makers:

With the smart grid, decentralised generation, mobile consumers, prosumers and renewables, supply and demand data that has historically been captive to the traditional power-generating utilities and grid operators will be made available to third parties, such as the equipment suppliers. This opens up for the creation of, for example, virtual power plants where a solution of equipment and software from, say, Siemens can match buyers and sellers of electricity.Managing the vast amount of data that will flow through the smart grid will be a challenge that requires significant investment. As mentioned earlier in this document, our colleagues in the utility team believe the European smart grid is a EUR 290bn capex opportunity. There is little doubt in our mind that Siemens, ABB and Schneider Electric will look to capture a significant proportion of that revenue opportunity.

The capex needed to process the vast amount of data flowing through the smart grid as well as its decentralised nature is worth bearing in mind, meanwhile, if you have even the slightest interest in the tech race underpinning Bitcoin.

As the UBS analysts go on to note, it all eventually comes down to the power of information to shock-absorb the swing factors that were previously unforeseeable and demanded excessive production to keep energy systems resilient.

Superior battery technology meanwhile is the key factor that allows for the consumption of solar power to be deferred to the point of most need. As the UBS analysts state:

Solar electricity so far is integrated into the power system – to be blunt – in a fairly dumb way. Thanks to generous subsidies, most owners of existing solar systems sell all their electricity at the time it is generated into the grid at fixed subsidised rates, no matter if there is under- or oversupply in the system. Because of that, utilities have to provide backup generation capacity, which adds to the total cost of the system. Key to the future is to consume the solar power on-site. This requires either, or a combination of: (1) storage capacity; and (2) a demand profile that matches supply. We believe batteries will play a dominant role in this context.
Things in any case are happening. We’ll bring you a few more detailed insights from the 55 page report later this week.
 
Last edited:
.
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/08/...medium-for-electricity-storage-and-discharge/

Electric cars as a medium for electricity storage and discharge
Izabella Kaminska 5 comments |

We promised some more insights from the UBS report insights from the UBS report on solar, batteries and electric vehicles. So here goes.

First, a chart showing just how quickly solar costs have been falling since 2007:

Screen-Shot-2014-08-29-at-16.19.15.png



According to the UBS analysts, that means solar panels are fast on their way to becoming a commodity. As they note:

The cost of solar panels has dropped c85% over the past 7 years – a decline that even solar enthusiasts had under-estimated. And the cost degression is likely to continue on further economies of scale and innovation (better solar cell performance).

The trick now, however, is making the current solar network smarter, especially when it comes to its decentralised nature. This, the analysts say, is currently an unexploited strength.

For one thing, it’s actually much more efficient to produce power where it is consumed because transmission costs are then minimised.

The problem we have now is that solar electricity is integrated into the power system in a fairly dumb way. Generous subsidies from government mean that electricity is usually sold as soon as it is generated, irrespective of whether there is under- or over-supply in the system.

More efficient batteries, power storage systems, and better information about demand and supply, however, stands to change all that. In fact, once they’re properly and smartly integrated into the network, the full benefits of decentralised power-generating systems could really come to the fore.

And as the UBS analysts point out, that need not be a bad thing for centralised utility providers:

On the one hand, there will be an accelerated paradigm shift away from large-scale conventional power plants. Even a blue-sky 20% EV / plug-in hybrid penetration would only add 5% to power demand, which will be more than offset by energy efficiency in other areas. On the other hand, the trends offer vast opportunities for utilities in smart grids, value-add services in end customer supply and decentralised backup power generation. These positive drivers should more than offset the gradual extinction of large-scale power plants, even though we expect intense competition for end customers, also from non-utility industries. The impact on company level varies a lot depending on the positioning in the value chain.

The really cool thing that the analysts anticipate is that electric cars could end up being the catalyst that smarten up our grid sooner rather than later.

As they note, cars could soon become a medium for electricity storage/discharge:

As products, cars offer good value, they are increasingly reliable and high tech, and are often sold at low or even no margin. At the same time, they wear and depreciate fast, whether utilised or not, and sit idle 70-80% of the time. Electrification is holding the promise that cars could be used more efficiently in the future, including as a medium for electricity storage/discharge.

This, in and of itself, is an amazing point with huge implications for markets and value.

And while we don’t mean to go all 2001 Kubrick on readers, the process being described here really is the equivalent of the world developing a nervous system, in which cars become our fat cells.

In the long run, we’re talking about the sort of optimisation that could minimise the world’s hydrocarbon intake to the bare minimum. And even that minimum could be efficiently managed if smarter filters end up behaving increasingly like a digestive tract.

Some more from UBS:

One of the oft-cited constraints on the potential growth of EVs is whether utilities are able to cope with the increased demand for charging – excluding any capacity increase linked to solar self-generation required from utilities. We believe that additional power demand from EVs can largely be met by existing and new renewable sources. Assuming a blue-sky 20% EV penetration in Europe by 2025, the incremental electricity demand would be 5% (ie, growth of 0.5% p.a.), as the following table shows. We think the annual energy-efficiency impact on demand is larger than the potential EV impact, which is why we do not think overall electricity demand will grow even in an accelerated EV-penetration scenario.

And the really innovative stuff (our emphasis):

The new decentralised electricity world will only work in a smart grid environment. Collecting and analysing data from millions of electricity users will optimise the grid and reduce grid cost. The benefits to the system could amount to €50bn p.a., on our estimates, thanks to (1) lower and more intelligent consumption (peak shaving); (2) a reduction in theft/losses; (3) lower opex and maintenance capex; (4) lower back-up capacity needs and avoided replacement of thermal capacity; and (5) lower carbon emissions. In the context of EVs, smart grids could provide the technical basis for innovative solutions.

For example, an EV could have a personalised ‘ID’ for charging/discharging, no matter where it is hooked up to the grid. The EV could be charged on a company parking lot with solar power from the owner’s rooftop panels at home while the owner is at work during the day. The utilities would charge the customer for the grid use and the metering/billing services. This would reduce the amount of stationary battery capacity required at home.

Electricity demand is set to become smart in both the household and commercial/industrial segments. Demand will be much better aligned with the available supply, and it will minimise cost to electricity users and the entire system. Demand-side response – that is, large electricity users cutting demand at peak times and getting compensated for that by grid operators, will be a commonly used tool to keep the system in balance.Smart grids will be the enabling technology for this response. As a result, peak demand should be greatly reduced (as should the need for back-up power stations).

Screen-Shot-2014-08-29-at-18.07.57.png


In many ways, it’s exactly the same sort of shock-absorber smoothing effect we’re experiencing across the board, from hotels and taxis to market prices.

In the case of AirBNB and Uber, peak-shaving is being facilitated by the release of pre-existing inventory/assets into peak demand periods, and in the case of markets it’s being facilitated by the ability to divert oversupply into dark inventory silos (ETFs and such) where it can be stored (battery form) until its use is demanded.

In other words, we’re all swing producers now. Which, of course, doesn’t bode well for traders or anyone who makes their money from arbitraging away volatility.

(And hence also the demand for the creation of purposefully inelastic and thus volatile markets like bitcoin.)
 
.
No they are evil. They only dream about wars and unhappiness, it's more valuable

They are like vampires
 
.
Electric vehicles will not be free of cost to drive any time, governments are already taxing the vehicles / mile. This brings us to oil companies major one that is , they are the ones own most patents on solar and Ev batteries. So the will continue to make money by diversifying their investments.Only losers I see is the oil producing countries.
 
. . . . .
Very cool stuff (interesting Blade Runner reference)

Tesla Model 3, $35,000, 2017. Should be interesting.
So are people going to have a big battery in their basement charged by solar roof shingles and not bother with selling it back to the utilities?
 
. .
A few months ago a Slovenian company presented an electric engine with 700km range in a Mazda family van. Their words are that it's about 30% better than anyone. Car companies are piling at the doors to give the best offer.
German Mahle supposedly gave a buyout offer immediately.
Government is also in talks with BMW and Tesla to set up a pilot project for use of electric cars, but i really don't know more details about this one....except that the strategy is that the second family car should be electric. They calculated Slovenia can save up to 2. bill.€'s per year in this way. Money which is otherwise paid for petrol.

Future looks bright. :)
 
Last edited:
.
Current, in IEEE meeting presentations for power, 7 out 10 presentations are on renewable energy or renewable energy related subjects and 2 of 10 are on electric vehicle and related subjects. As you can imagine, there are A LOT of people doing research on them.
 
.
I don't like electric cars, it's less exciting, and not actually as eco-friendly as people claimed. i like hydrogen car although it's still a very immature technology.
 
.
I don't like electric cars, it's less exciting, and not actually as eco-friendly as people claimed. i like hydrogen car although it's still a very immature technology.

Ever wonder why no one talks about hydrogen cars anymore, and why people like electric cars?

1. Electric cars are not entirely about the environment.
2. hydrogen cars have major flaws related to storage, distribution and generation of hydrogen.
3. Hydrogen doesn't actually come from water. It comes from coal and natural gas in the water shift reaction.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom