Discussion about Kashmir Issue by Back Benchers of UK Parliament.

[Jaanbaz]

Back bencher debates happen when most of MPs are all ready dosing off or are not even there. Indians don't get too happy. No one listens to a useless back bencher.

 

[Areesh]

Are you in mood for self goals?

Not only J&K is being discussed there AJK and GB are also being discussed in that debate..and wasn't GB declared defacto province of Pakistan?

So basically britishers are not only discussing what Indians consider as an integral part but Pakistanis too?

So what are you shamelessly smirking about?

We have no issues in someone debating GB or AJK. It is only you who wants to leave Kashmir issue disappear from the international arena. You want to hide this issue. Not we. GB is not our fifth province today. When it would become the fifth province we won't allow anyone to hold debates over it irrespective of the result of the debate. Till then Kashmir is open for debate. Not someone's atoot ang.

 

[ares]

We have no issues in someone debating GB or AJK. It is only you who wants to leave Kashmir issue disappear from the international arena. You want to hide this issue. Not we.

And it is exactly what we got, the last Britishers parliamentary debate on Kashmir was held 15 yrs back..in which it Brits decided meddling in Kashmir is not their business..now 15 yrs later..same result ..see you in another 15yr..maybe you ll have better result next decade..though I doubt it.

GB is not our fifth province today. When it would become the fifth province we won't allow anyone to hold debates over it irrespective of the result of the debate. Till then Kashmir is open for debate. Not someone's atoot ang.

GB was declared defacto provincial status by president of Pakistan and Pakistani supreme court ruling declaring it a part of Pakistan.


[News] Gilgit-Baltistan becomes fifth province, no relation with Kashmir: Chief Minister | Gilgit-Baltistan Times


Gilgit-Baltistan part of Pakistan, declares court – The Express Tribune

As in regards to your taunt about "not allowing anyone hold debates over declared Pakistani provinces."

US Congress to debate motion on “self-determination” for Pakistani Balochistan - World Socialist Web Site

Lol..A lot of self goals today

 

[chhota bheem]

Yeah I know the full story. Thank you.

if you know then why to troll and make obvious and spoil your reputation already, you are known around as a troll

 

[Areesh]

And it is exactly what we got, the last Britishers parliamentary debate on Kashmir was held 15 yrs back..in which it Brits decided meddling in Kashmir is not their business..now 15 yrs later..same result ..see you in another 15yr..maybe you ll have better result next decade..though I doubt it.

Yeah result might be better if we keep on trying. We should continue bringing Kashmir again and again. After all it is you who wants to hide Kashmir issue obscurity. Not us.

GB was declared defacto provincial status by president of Pakistan and Pakistani supreme court ruling declaring it a part of Pakistan

Yeah I know that. You didn't need to work hard to present links for that. LOL. Anyways till GB won't become de-jure province of Pakistan we won't mind someone discussing GB if they are discussing the unsettled Kashmir issue.

As in regards to your taunt about "not allowing anyone hold debates over declared Pakistani provinces."

US Congress to debate motion on “self-determination” for Pakistani Balochistan - World Socialist Web Site

So what? Was this so called "self-determination" motion had any impact on US govt policy viz a viz Baluchistan? Pakistani response was clear to this BS. We didn't celebrate results of this debate instead we ask US govt clarifications over this motion who said that it has nothing to do with this motion and US accepts Pakistan's rule and sovereignty on Baluchistan province. They didn't said we don't want to interfere in this disputed region since there is no dispute in Baluchistan .It is a settled transaction. Something which doesn't happen and will never happen with Kashmir. Unless it gets resolved.

if you know then why to troll and make obvious and spoil your reputation already, you are known around as a troll

Move on kid. A bharati on a Pakistani forum should be last to decide about my reputation.

 

[chhota bheem]

Move on kid. A bharati on a Pakistani forum should be last to decide about my reputation.

Which ever form dsnt matter,a troll is a troll.

 

[Areesh]

Which ever form dsnt matter,a troll is a troll.

Yeah whatever.

 

[alpha q]

A third country is discussing your "atoot ang" and integral part in their parliament and you guys are happy.

Yup happy because they didnt supported pakistan.

We don't need a gora to tell us about Kashmir issue. We just want your "intergral part" to be discussed by others. Good enough for us.

You dont want a gora to tell you about kashmir issue then why go to britain again and again, there will always be goras telling u about kashmir issue in britain.

Yeah I know the full story. Thank you.



Well then a news for you. We would take it again to third countries. You call it crying. We call it diplomacy.

Your diplomacy failed 3:1 buddy...

 

[Areesh]

Yup happy because they didnt supported pakistan.

Well we will try again. Back benchers are stupid anyways.

You dont want a gora to tell you about kashmir issue then why go to britain again and again, there will always be goras telling u about kashmir issue in britain.

Because we want to keep this issue alive. Something you don't want. You want to hide the fact there is a problem in a region like Kashmir. We just want to bring it to the scene again and again.

Your diplomacy failed 3:1 buddy...

Not really.

 

[alpha q]

where? doesnt state in the article or did i miss it while browsing through?

hmmm.....

and he said it all

Last time i checked this ward guy is not pm or queen of england.

Well we will try again. Back benchers are stupid anyways.



Because we want to keep this issue alive. Something you don't want. You want to hide the fact there is a problem in a region like Kashmir. We just want to bring it to the scene again and again.



Not really.

We know there is a problm in kashmir but it would be ironed out soon with large money pouring in the valley and people having jobs then they would be alot busier than to go on streets and pelting stones aimlessly on someone's brainwashing.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Sooner or later, whole world will be pro India. Bees follows the nectar.

 

[Mythal]

A foreign country is discussing your issues and you are rejoicing ONLY because the results "according" the heading or reporter was in favour of you when 1/3 didnt side anyone....so am not sure what zee media is trying to say

No I am not rejoicing, I am only addressing the point that "India still looks at mommy for approval/ appreciation".

 

[Dubious]

Sooner or later, whole world will be pro India. Bees follows the nectar.

err they follow the ultraviolet reflection emitted by the flowers

 

[foxbat]

Well we will try again. Back benchers are stupid anyways.



Because we want to keep this issue alive. Something you don't want. You want to hide the fact there is a problem in a region like Kashmir. We just want to bring it to the scene again and again.



Not really.

Fortunately, now after Musharraf's idiotic play in Kargil, the world has started accepting Pakistan as the mischief maker in the region. And thanks to Islamist terrorists all over the world, that Kashmir no longer looks like a troubled spot any more. God bless Einstien's soul. Theory of relativity indeed works

 

[Iggy]

Well it is India who keeps saying go take it to international courts...and also it was UK who caused the dispute in the 1st place yet you want to use the same country to "resolve" the issue?

Lolz, it was not us who is asking each and every country to intermediate in Kashmir issue.. Our stance is that its a bilateral issue and its up to both our countries and no one else to solve it and nobody in India asked to take it to international courts.. You went to international courts to complain about India and you lost miserably..