Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Well in any case I hope u and other members like u(no matter their nationality) stay on this forum.
I perfectly intend to stay as long as I possibly can, without compromise. But just to get an example of the kind of crass idiot I have to face, take a look:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/gun-...-fire-again-jan-3.536955/page-3#post-10160035
bro i never saw a common indian as a threat or my enemy (may throw a funny light hearted jab or two at them once in a while).
but these assets are real threat(force multiplier) to us and i feel no shame in admitting that i will feel relieved if they aren't there anymore just like many indian did when we lost p3 and saab 2000. plus there is a reason i didn't mentioned the c130 or c 17
Oh, I see, you were looking at the nuclear subs and the Phalcons. Well, there is a lot of activity on the nuclear sub front. Just at the moment, the concentration is on missile boats; these are underpowered and carry only four missile tubes each (to be progressively increased, in later models, to eight) and are Pakistan specific. Attack boats will follow; it is to be hoped that the nuclear engine power generation will improve dramatically by then, as those boats necessarily have to be high-performance.
About the Phalcons, you may be in luck, for the short term. It is unlikely that the Russian aeroplane on which these were being built have priced themselves out of the market, so there may be a pause before our own design takes flight.
Ob la di ob la da.....