No, they never did, you're just parroting nonsense, mr so called "Think Tank", in reality you know jack about this subject.
Like which "monumental repeated lies", do give an example.
Germany wasn't the only industrialized country with Communists, and not industrialization itself per say but the deplorable living and working standards of the workers due to the neglect on the part of the wealthy factory owners/Capitalists.
So your claim that Germany had communists because of Karl Marx and Engels were Germans isn't a logical one.
Doesn't mean the allies were winning the war until America entered. The British and French too lost millions at Somme, etc and by 1917 the French Army mutinied... It was mostly a stalemate both on land and at sea with German U-Boats enforcing a similar blockade against Britain in retaliation,
and the Germans thus far made more gains than the Allies and had a upper hand.
It was the American involvement which was crucial to breaking the stalemate. American involvement in the war came much later with the help of Jewish bankers,
as confirmed by these Zionist sources themselves:
"Malcolm's belief in the Balfour Declaration as a means of bringing the United States into the war
was confirmed by Samuel Landman, secretary to the Zionist leaders Weizmann and Sokolow, and later secretary of the World Zionist Organization. As
" the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis. Thus, as will be seen, the Zionists having carried out their part, and greatly helped to bring America in, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 was but the public confirmation of the necessarily secret "gentlemens' " agreement of 1916, made with the previous knowledge, acquiescence, and or approval of the Arabs, and of the British, and of the French and other Allied governments, and not merely a voluntary, altruistic and romantic gesture on the part of Great Britain as certain people either through pardonable ignorance assume or unpardonable ill-will would represent or rather misrepresent ...
[188] "-
Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine (London, 1936), pp. 4-5, New Zionist Press.
Behind the Balfour Declaration
"Speaking in the House of Commons on 4 July 1922, Winston Churchill asked rhetorically,
Are we to keep our pledge to the Zionists made in 1917...? Pledges and promises were made during the war, and they were made, not only on the merits, though I think the merits are considerable.
They were made because it was considered they would be of value to us in our struggle to win the war.
It was considered that the support which the Jews could give us all over the world, and particularly in the United States, and also in Russia, would be a definite palpable advantage. I was not responsible at that time for the giving of those pledges, nor for the conduct of the war of which they were, when given, an integral part. But like other members I supported the policy of the War Cabinet. Like other members, I accepted and was proud to accept a share in those great transactions, which left us with terrible losses, with formidable obligations,
but nevertheless with unchallengeable victory."
COLONIAL OFFICE. (Hansard, 4 July 1922)
Behind the Balfour Declaration
So are you suggesting that Winston Churchill is a "conspiracy theorist" for having confirmed that influential Jews were decisive in winning the Allies the war against Germany???
You contradicted yourself. You admited that Jews joined the communist movements in large numbers due to persecution for being Jews (anti-semetism) but you also state they were all Atheists?? Do you have proof that a people who believed they were persecuted due to their religious beliefs joined a movement because they advocated Atheism (contradiction much)??
Anyhow:
"In
1914,
the central office of the Zionist Organization and the seat of its directorate, the Zionist Executive, were in Berlin. It already had adherents in most Eastern Jewish communities, including all the countries at war, though its main strength was in Russia and Austria-Hungary.
[45] Some important institutions, namely, the Jewish Colonial Trust, the Anglo-Palestine Company and the Jewish National Fund, were incorporated in England. Of the Executive, two members (Otto Warburg
[M] and Arthur Hantke) were German citizens, three (Yechiel Tschlenow, Nahum Sokolow and Victor Jacobson) were Russians and one (Shmarya Levin) had recently exchanged his Russian for Austro-Hungarian nationality. The 25 members of the General Council included 12 from Germany and Austria-Hungary, 7 from Russia...Chaim Weizmann and Leopold Kessler) from England, and one each from Belgium, France, Holland and Rumania.
[46]Some prominent German Zionists associated themselves with a newly founded organization known as the
Komitee fur den Osten, whose aims were:
"To place at the disposal of the German Government the special knowledge of the founders and their relations with the Jews in Eastern Europe and in America, so as to contribute to the overthrow of Czarist Russia and to secure the national autonomy of the Jews......." [47]
The Zionists were, of course, coordinating their activities internationally. On the same day as the meeting in London, Rabbi Stephen Wise in the United States wrote to Brandeis: "I sent the memorandum to Colonel House covering our question, and he writes: 'I hope the dream you have may soon become a reality."
[118a]
The reports reaching England of impending dissolution of the Russian state practically removed the need for Russian endorsement of Zionist aims, but made French and Italian acceptance even more urgent. This at any rate was the belief of Sykes, Balfour, Lloyd George and Winston Churchill, who, as claimed in their subsequent statements, were convinced that proclaimed Allied support for Zionist aims would especially influence the United States.
Events in Russia made the cooperation of Jewish groups with the Allies much easier. At a mass meeting in March 1917 to celebrate the revolution which had then taken place, Rabbi Stephen Wise, who had succeeded Brandeis as chairman of the American Provisional Zionist Committee after Brandeis's appointment to the Supreme Court, said: "I believe that of all the achievements of my people, none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Israel have taken in the great movement which has culminated in free Russia." [119]
Negotiations for a series of loans totalling $190,000,000 by the United States to the Provisional Government in Russia of Alexander Kerensky were begun on the advice of the U.S. ambassador to Russia, David R. Francis, who noted in his telegram to Secretary of State Lansing, "financial aid now from America would be a master-stroke. Confidential. Immeasurably important to the Jews that revolution succeed... " [120]
In the same month, Leiber Davidovich Bronstein, alias Leon Trotsky, a Russian-born U.S. immigrant, had left the Bronx, New York, for Russia, with a contingent of followers, while V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) and a party of about thirty were moving across Germany from Switzerland, through Scandinavia to Russia. Some evidence exists that Schiff and other sponsors like Helphand financed these revolutionaries."
Behind the Balfour Declaration
Leon Trotsky, the Jew:
Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lenin's Jewish Ancestry confirmed:
Lenin's Jewish roots put on display in Russian museum
So here you have it in the above source influential Jewish Bankers from America funding a Communist revolution within Russia to overthrow the Czar and a influential
Jewish Rabbi Stephen Wise praising the revolutionaries (who were Jews) as
"noble sons and daughters of Israel".
1). So the major financiers of the Communist revolution were Jewish Bankers (all Zionists).
2). The major Bolshevik Revolutionaries were all Jews.
3). All three of Germany's Communist Revolutionaries were also Jews.
Was this a coincidence?? Of course not. It was a carefully premeditated and well organized Jewish plan.
If after this you continue to parrot your "its a conspiracy theory" rant then you truly lack sufficient grey matter in your head to think logically.
Do you have proof?
The onus is on you to prove your accusation that Hitler wanted all of Poland and Czechoslovakia.
You really have absolutely no knowledge of history. Hitler only claimed the territories which were ethnically German for 700 years and were torn from Germany after the treaty of Versailles. He never annexed the entire Polish state nor Czechoslovakia.
So yes, Hitler was justified in invading Poland to retake the lands which rightfully belonged to Germany, especially when considering the fact that the Poles began to systematically massacre and expel ethnic Germans from their ancestral lands..
Considerable Ethnic German Population within the territories given to Poland post Versailles:
You're the biased and hypocritical pseudo historian here parroting unlimited historical falsifications without even backing them with any source or evidence, mr so called "think tank", the irony is you can't even think logically and jump to label historical facts as "conspiracy theories".
Secondly, the Polish were not defending their 'homeland' by slaughtering and displacing Ethnic Germans over the fear that they would vote to become a part of Germany if a referendum were to be held to determine the future of Danzig and the Corridor.
The onus is on you to prove your accusation that Hitler stated he wanted to exterminate Slavs through a 'racial genocide'.
You can't lecture me on this subject, especially when all you have to back yourself is absolutely nothing, zilch, nada, other than hearsay since you really can't do your own research and thus your own thinking mr. so called 'think tank'.
The onus is on you to prove your tall claims, non of which you have proven. You truly are a lost cause.
I on the other hand backed each and every single one of my arguments with reputable and authentic sources. However, that still did not stop you from labeling them as "a conspiracy theory" since you really don't have a rebuttal at all.
Since you brought up the so called German 'confessions' here is how reliable these so called confessions were since they were all extracted through the use of physical and emotional torture:
" Former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss was tortured by British officials into signing a false and self-incriminating "confession" that has been widely cited as a key document of Holocaust extermination. His testimony before the Nuremberg Tribunal, a high point of the proceeding, was perhaps the most striking and memorable evidence presented there of a German extermination program. /73
Höss maintained that two and half million people had been killed in Auschwitz gas chambers, and that another 500,000 inmates had died there of other causes. No serious or reputable historian now accepts either of these fantastic figures, and other key portions of Höss' "confession" are now generally acknowledged to be untrue. /74
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn has cited the case of Jupp Aschenbrenner, a Bavarian who was tortured into signing a statement that he had worked on mobile gas chambers ("gas vans") during the war. It wasn't until several years later that he was finally able to prove that he had actually spent that time in Munich studying to become an electric welder. /75
Fritz Sauckel, head of the German wartime labor mobilization program,
was sentenced to death at the main Nuremberg trial. An important piece of evidence presented to the Tribunal by the US prosecution was an affidavit signed by the defendant. (Nuremberg document 3057-PS.) It turned out that Sauckel had put his signature to this self-incriminating statement, which had been presented to him by his captors in finished form,
only after he was bluntly told that if he hesitated, his wife and children would be turned over to the Soviets. "I did not stop to consider, and thinking of my family, I signed the document," Sauckel later declared. /76
Hans Fritzsche, another defendant in the main Nuremberg trial, was similarly forced to sign a self-damning confession while he was a prisoner of the Soviet secret police in Moscow. (Nuremberg document USSR-474.) /77
Nuremberg defendant Julius Streicher, who was eventually hanged because he published a sometimes sensational anti-Jewish weekly paper, was brutally mistreated following his arrest.
He was badly beaten, kicked, whipped, spat at, forced to drink saliva and burned with cigarettes. His genitals were beaten. Eyebrow and chest hair was pulled out. He was stripped and photographed. Fellow defendant Hans Frank was savagely beaten by two black GIs shortly after his arrest. August Eigruber, former Gauleiter of Upper Austria, was mutilated and castrated at the end of the war. /78
Josef Kramer, former commandant of both the Bergen-Belsen and Auschwitz-Birkenau camps,
and other defendants in the British-run "Belsen" trial, were reportedly also tortured, some of them so brutally that they begged to be put to death. /79
"
The Nuremberg Trials (part 2)
How Britain Tortured Nazi POW's During Interrogations- The Daily Mail
How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss
Now, once again i reinforced my argument with legitimate sources and if despite this you dismiss all of this evidence as "a conspiracy theory" then one can only question your sanity.
Also, this thread would be of importance to other members, Muslims in particular since it deals with the events which lead to Palestine being handed over to Zionists despite the land was inhabited by Muslims for centuries and belonged to Muslims:
@
al-Hasani @
Arabian Legend @
Yzd Khalifa @
p(-)0ENiX @
KingMamba @
Akheilos @
BLACKEAGLE @
Horus @
Armstrong @
Bratva @
Serpentine @
Hazzy997 etc...
