Chak Bamu
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 5,361
- Reaction score
- 69
- Country
- Location
One of the reasons why I am very happy that the Center did not make Hyderabad a Union Territory(UT). UT's are owned and run by the GoI, instead of the states.
When a city becomes very contested by different parties, GoI steps in and makes it neutral by taking it(declaring it as a UT).
It happened when Punjab and Haryana were split. Both laid claim to Chandigarh. Center took the decision to make Chandigarh as a UT. The result of this is that Chandigarh is a common capital for both Punjab and Haryana. And neither are going to leave it. Had this not happened, then either Punjab or Haryana would have been forced to build a new capital, and a decade later, it would have yielded them much in terms of better standard of living and taxes.
Unfortunately no politician in India wants to work for long term prosperity, just short term gains.
This time, when Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were being split, Andhra was demanding the same thing, that Hyderabad be declared as UT.
Fortunately though, the Center refused. Telangana got Hyderabad. And now Andhra Pradesh will now have to build a new city of its own. Its already in the process of identifying land for the new city and their Chief Minister has said he will make a great city.
Good enough for me.
Excellent observation! However, this makes sense if Federal government shares some expense and the state inheriting the contested city is made to shell out some resources for the loss to the state that is forced to build a capital anew. After all shared resources are spent in developing a capital. If Federal rules over someone to their loss, it has an obligation to compensate.
Did something like that happen?