What's new

Dangerous Crossroads: Britain’s Royal Air Force Pilots Ordered To Shoot Down “Hostile” Russian Jets

Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
01_NH11JET_1183976k.jpg


As the US officially enters the Yemen military campaign, the UK appears ready and willing to precipiate a catalytic event from which there is no going back. With relations between Russia and the West at post-Cold War lows and deteriorating fast, Royal Air Force (RAF) pilots have been given the go-ahead to shoot down Russian military jets when flying missions over Syria and Iraq, if they are endangered by them. The development comes with warnings that the UK and Russia are now “one step closer” to being at war, according to the Sunday Times.

While the RAF’s Tornado pilots have been instructed to avoid contact with Russian aircraft while engaged in missions for Operation Shader, the codename for the RAF’s anti-Isis work in Iraq and Syria, their aircraft have been armed with air-to-air missiles and the pilots have been given the green light to defend themselves if they are threatened by Russian pilots.

“The first thing a British pilot will do is to try to avoid a situation where an air-to-air attack is likely to occur — you avoid an area if there is Russian activity,” an unidentified source from the UK’s Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) told the Sunday Times. “But if a pilot is fired on or believes he is about to be fired on, he can defend himself. We now have a situation where a single pilot, irrespective of nationality, can have a strategic impact on future events.”

Where things get tricky is the qualifier “if he believes he is about to be fired on” – since this makes open engagement a function of threat evaluation in real time during stressed conditions, the likelihood of an escalation that could result in two warplanes shooting at each other, just jumped significantly.

The RAF Tornados aircraft will be armed with heat-seeking Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missiles (Asraams, also called AIM-132 missiles), the IBT adds. These weapons, which cost £200,000 each, have a longer range than other air-to-air missiles, allowing RAF pilots to shoot down enemy aircraft without being targeted themselves.

Providing cover to the largely underreported, if substantial escalation, according to the Sunday Times report an appraisal carried out by UK defence officials said: “It took six days for Russia to strike any Isis targets at all. Their air strikes have included moderate opposition groups who have been fighting to defend their areas from Isis. Among the targets hit were three field hospitals.” In the past 24 hours Russia’s Defence Ministry said that it has continued its air strikes on IS positions in Hama, Idlib, Latakia and Raqqa. It reported that the attacks resulted in the “complete destruction” of “53 fortified areas and strong points with armament and military hardware”, seven ammunition depots, four field camps of “terrorists”, one command centre, and artillery and mortar batteries.

Russia has countered that US airstrikes have failed to make much of an impact on ISIS targets, and as reported last month, a “mistaken” strike by the US coalition forces killed over 60 Syrian soldiers in a move Russia accused of being a provocation to war.

The Sunday Times’ report quoted a defence source as saying: “Up till now RAF Tornados have been equipped with 500lb satellite-guided bombs — there has been no or little air-to-air threat. But in the last week the situation has changed. We need to respond accordingly.”

But another source of the original story summarized the severity of the situation best when he said that “we need to protect our pilots but at the same time we’re taking a step closer to war. It will only take one plane to be shot down in an air-to-air battle and the whole landscape will change.”



The original source of this article is Zero Hedge
Copyright © Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge, 2016


http://www.globalresearch.ca/danger...-down-hostile-russian-jets-over-syria/5550820


http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Defence/article1618135.ece
 
Last edited:
.
Imagine Eurofighter chasing Sukhoi in a dogfight... Awesome
 
.
There is a multitude of air defenses in Syria including the S-400 with a rang of 400km. 6 Torandos got whacked in Desert Storm by ancient SAMs and one by a patriot in 2003.

The likelyhood of a Tornado shooting down an SU-35 or SU-30 is like slim to none unless the Sukhoi pilot did nothing, in the event a Tornado does down a unsuspecting Russian aircraft the odds of the Tornado retuning safely is almost zero unless Russia decides not to fire SAMs or launch aircraft to intercept the champions of freedom.
 
.
I doubt they'll do anything with the s-400 around.
 
. .
Misleading title.
They ownly talked about defending themselves when being targeted.
Which the Russians are not going to do.
 
.
01_NH11JET_1183976k.jpg


As the US officially enters the Yemen military campaign, the UK appears ready and willing to precipiate a catalytic event from which there is no going back. With relations between Russia and the West at post-Cold War lows and deteriorating fast, Royal Air Force (RAF) pilots have been given the go-ahead to shoot down Russian military jets when flying missions over Syria and Iraq, if they are endangered by them. The development comes with warnings that the UK and Russia are now “one step closer” to being at war, according to the Sunday Times.

While the RAF’s Tornado pilots have been instructed to avoid contact with Russian aircraft while engaged in missions for Operation Shader, the codename for the RAF’s anti-Isis work in Iraq and Syria, their aircraft have been armed with air-to-air missiles and the pilots have been given the green light to defend themselves if they are threatened by Russian pilots.

“The first thing a British pilot will do is to try to avoid a situation where an air-to-air attack is likely to occur — you avoid an area if there is Russian activity,” an unidentified source from the UK’s Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) told the Sunday Times. “But if a pilot is fired on or believes he is about to be fired on, he can defend himself. We now have a situation where a single pilot, irrespective of nationality, can have a strategic impact on future events.”

Where things get tricky is the qualifier “if he believes he is about to be fired on” – since this makes open engagement a function of threat evaluation in real time during stressed conditions, the likelihood of an escalation that could result in two warplanes shooting at each other, just jumped significantly.

The RAF Tornados aircraft will be armed with heat-seeking Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missiles (Asraams, also called AIM-132 missiles), the IBT adds. These weapons, which cost £200,000 each, have a longer range than other air-to-air missiles, allowing RAF pilots to shoot down enemy aircraft without being targeted themselves.

Providing cover to the largely underreported, if substantial escalation, according to the Sunday Times report an appraisal carried out by UK defence officials said: “It took six days for Russia to strike any Isis targets at all. Their air strikes have included moderate opposition groups who have been fighting to defend their areas from Isis. Among the targets hit were three field hospitals.” In the past 24 hours Russia’s Defence Ministry said that it has continued its air strikes on IS positions in Hama, Idlib, Latakia and Raqqa. It reported that the attacks resulted in the “complete destruction” of “53 fortified areas and strong points with armament and military hardware”, seven ammunition depots, four field camps of “terrorists”, one command centre, and artillery and mortar batteries.

Russia has countered that US airstrikes have failed to make much of an impact on ISIS targets, and as reported last month, a “mistaken” strike by the US coalition forces killed over 60 Syrian soldiers in a move Russia accused of being a provocation to war.

The Sunday Times’ report quoted a defence source as saying: “Up till now RAF Tornados have been equipped with 500lb satellite-guided bombs — there has been no or little air-to-air threat. But in the last week the situation has changed. We need to respond accordingly.”

But another source of the original story summarized the severity of the situation best when he said that “we need to protect our pilots but at the same time we’re taking a step closer to war. It will only take one plane to be shot down in an air-to-air battle and the whole landscape will change.”



The original source of this article is Zero Hedge
Copyright © Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge, 2016
Where is the source ? Another bullshit article. Lol. None of our news channel reported this, not even the BBC, and Boris Johnson recently rejected a no fly zone over Syria since it will involved taking down Russian places, this news is another joke. Lol
 
.
It will be stupid move by raf.
Their already loosing shine and glory will go down to dust. Russia is no yemen or afghan.

Su migs s400 and many gadgets in pocket will come handy. Raf will bite the dust if they try misadventure.
I dont know when turkey shot down russian sukhoi i felt like my own country had a disgraceful moment.
This timw i hope russia teach them a lesson.
 
.
Where is the source ? Another bullshit article. Lol. None of our news channel reported this, not even the BBC, and Boris Johnson recently rejected a no fly zone over Syria since it will involved taking down Russian places, this news is another joke. Lol
Source http://www.globalresearch.ca/danger...-down-hostile-russian-jets-over-syria/5550820 :p:

SundayTimes : http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Defence/article1618135.ece you can read it only if you have subscription.


Title is taken from SundayTimes and article from globalresearch that's why it was confusing, now title is correct, edited !!
 
.
Source http://www.globalresearch.ca/danger...-down-hostile-russian-jets-over-syria/5550820 :p:

SundayTimes : http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Defence/article1618135.ece you can read it only if you have subscription.


Title is taken from SundayTimes and article from globalresearch that's why it was confusing, now title is correct, edited !!

How can the title be :they have been ordered to shot down Russian jets, meanwhile when you read the article itself/details it clearly says it's in case they are attacked by Russian fighter jets(which will.never happen anyway)? ANY country will defend itself if it was attack , isn't that obvious?
I guess NATO fighter jets patrolling Baltic skies have also been "ordered to attack/shoot down Russian fighters ", since they Patrol Baltic airspace against any threats and if they are attacked they will have to retaliate like everybody what's new there? Lol.
Using this articles logic: Pakistanis FIGHTER jets have also been ordered to shoot down Indian fighter jets, Chinese fighters jets have been ordered o shop down Japanese fighters etc etc LMAO:rofl:

Another sensationalistic article just trying to draw in more readers attention as always. Lol Nothing worth it at all.
Ain't surprise though. Journalists these days .lool. thread should be closed . Bullshit news.
 
.
How can the title be :they have been ordered to shot down Russian jets, meanwhile when you read the article itself/details it clearly says it's in case they are attacked by Russian fighter jets(which will.never happen anyway)? ANY country will defend itself if it was attack , isn't that obvious?
I guess NATO fighter jets patrolling Baltic skies have also been "ordered to attack/shoot down Russian fighters ", since they Patrol Baltic airspace against any threats and if they are attacked they will have to retaliate like everybody what's new there? Lol.
Using this articles logic: Pakistanis FIGHTER jets have also been ordered to shoot down Indian fighter jets, Chinese fighters jets have been ordered o shop down Japanese fighters etc etc LMAO:rofl:

Another sensationalistic article just trying to draw in more readers attention as always. Lol Nothing worth it at all.
Ain't surprise though. Journalists these days .lool. thread should be closed . Bullshit news.
Yep,i second your thought..it is a clickbait title that's for sure & buzzfeed just do the same thing like many others :p:
 
. .
Irrespective of the title of this thread and the news article. World events are getting dangerous especially as NATO and those who control power in NATO nations are trying to provoke war against Russia. I would not be surprised if a false flag attack is done to light the fire for direct attacks on Russia or to provoke Russia.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom