Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
well Kill All Muslims is not Trending anymore ...
Trending
You might be checking Pakistan trends. They are trending kaptaankidholak. Facepalm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well Kill All Muslims is not Trending anymore ...
Trending
The reason I use the word 'extremist' is because it is widely understood and basically established to be, well, a radical and violent person.I think the dilemma would be solved if you try to clarify what you mean by 'extremism'. I'm guessing that you are using that term to describe terrorists, such as the ones who attacked Charlie Hebdo today, or people of AQ, TTP etc.
But literally, "extremism" just means being uncompromising in a belief, holding extreme views, and possibly (but not necessarily) also resorting to violence to bring that about.
Sorry, but this is incorrect. Going by literal definition, yes, that would be true - but, like I said before, 'extremist' isn't exactly the best way to define it.ere's the difficult point to ponder - if extremists are merely people who believe very firmly and uncompromisingly in something, do moderates who believe the same ideology have a right to criticize them for holding on to the same beliefs as themselves, but to a stronger extent? The difference between moderates and extremists is only in how strongly each believes the ideology, and how far they are willing to go to bring it into fruition.
Islam is not the problem, if that's what you're asking.So is extremism the problem, or the belief itself?
I haven't. No one from my family has. None of my friends have. Many Muslims have,yes, in direct contradiction to Islam. So what they did and advocated is in no way representative of the religion itself - rather, it is in opposition of the religion. The ones doing the violence were mostly the uneducated political-mullah crowd and yes, admittedly, they have more than a little Influence. (i.e a lot - way too much than is healthy)Haven't muslims (in recent times) advocated violence for far lesser offences? (Salman Rushdie, Jyllands-posten controversy etc?)
Extremists doesn't just mean terrorists. All of those who supported the fatwa are mistaken and extremists as per my definition.The cartoons published by Charlie Hebdo were far cruder and arguably more offensive than Salman Rushdie's writings. Yet, a very large number of muslims (not just terrorists) fully supported the fatwa against him.
The people who support the same thing for lesser offences are in no way moderates. And, by opposing clear commands from the Prophet and the Quran, their definition as Muslims is really 'weak', to say the least (I won't go as far as to call them non-Muslims, because not only is that trying to shift the blame, it is also takfir (excommunication), which is forbidden in Islam)So why feel angry at a terrorist attack, when even "moderates" support the same thing for lesser "offences", just because the former makes a big splash on TV, and shocking images are visible for all to see?
Khomeini disobeyed God and his Prophet by issuing that fatwa and according to Islamic Law, he should be tried for trying to cause injustice, disrespecting the Qur'an, spreading corruption in the land and takfir.Didn't these terrorists do precisely what Khomeini advocated should be done to Rushdie, an opinion which many muslims still support?
You might be checking Pakistan trends. They are trending kaptaankidholak. Facepalm.
Not to mention the Norwegian terrorist Andres Breivik who killed 77 and injured 319.So they are trending kill all muslims for 12 casualties. What should I trend when hundreds of kids are killed by Israeli troops in Gaza and the best part is that many of those Israeli soldiers are not even native of that land and migrated their to defend their so called promised home and the same Europeans and Indians were openly cheering for that massacre.
A Muslim. If he practices it, then a good Muslim. One that believes it, takes into account the context and the concept of precedence (i.e a sunnah/hadith can not contradict the Quran). Also, provided that it is the sahih hadith + sahih sunnah he believes in and not just something he heard a random guy with a beard say.@TankMan how would you describe someone who believes in every word of the quran and the sunnah?
Not to mention the Norwegian terrorist Andres Breivik who killed 77 and injured 319.
No hastags were done against him or christianity or Atheism. Because he was white european and not a muslim.
He wasn't even given death sentence and will be free after a few years.
We condemn terrorism.but condemn terrorism by all.
You are confusing religious freedom with cultural freedom.Nowhere near the same extent as freedom of religion exists in the west.
Well, if he does then he wouldnt be violent....Quran asks us to humble ourselves ...violent person is never humble....Mullahs who want earthly pleasures or want followers and will say anything to get more...are far from humble!@TankMan how would you describe someone who believes in every word of the quran and the sunnah?
No one hijacked it...there are wolf in sheep clothing operating everywhere!You are 1.2 billion how can you let a minority dumbshits hijack you religion.
Stand up,speak up and fight these savages and restore the image if Islam which spreads tolerance,compassion and humility.
Failure to do so will be fatal for all muslims.
I didnt understand that one...wth is dholak? shadi?You might be checking Pakistan trends. They are trending kaptaankidholak. Facepalm.
Why only him what about Solomon whose whole history on PDF is about opening anti Muslim posts...and 500 whose ONLY sources are Israeli news agencies...No I mean literally ONLY anything published by Israel in Israel!@waz @Jungibaaz @T-Faz please ban this extremist , just look at his posts how's he being tolerated is beyond me
It is the failure of the US supported dictatorships in Middle East that did develop their countries and created viable economy and democracy where different political ideologies could be discussed rationally. Shah of Iran, Persian Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other states ruled by American puppets. Some North African socialist states were all French puppets with for-life presidents. Americans, French and Russia supported their puppets and never put pressure to democratize their states to create a democratic system it is their failure too.
Imagine what happens if we trend
Kill jews or kill hindus or kill everybody,
What the **** has all your rant got to do with the issue/thread at hand? Stop derailing and shitting over each and every thread, mullah!
I thought so called you believed in free speech and discussion of issues. But self proclaimed "Liberal Terrorist" title suits you well.
View attachment 182133
View attachment 182134
There you go, wonderful work mullahs and terrorists, wonderful. Hatred for Muslims is already at peak levels, and now you go ahead and kill twelve more people to show the world that Islamophobia is justified/true (it isn't - it isn't supposed to be, at least)
[/SPOILER]
See the difference between Islam and murderous idiocy?
Thank you, I was meaning to do that but decided against it for some reason; probably got too caught up in other stuff and just posted a 'don't feed the trolls' poster instead.What the **** has all your rant got to do with the issue/thread at hand? Stop derailing and shitting over each and every thread, mullah!
Nothing to laugh about. What the **** is there to laugh about here?
@Oscar @Horus @T-Faz, kindly show the door to any and all wannabe mullah's and hinduvata trolls effing up this thread.
Admittedly, his response was a little too harsh - but your post was, indeed, off topic and 'gol mol', as I explained in my reply to you in post # 11.I thought so called you believed in free speech and discussion of issues. But self proclaimed "Liberal Terrorist" title suits you well.