CIA admits backing terror groups in Pakistan

[pakdefender]

We must examine in details the admission cum boast by the CIA that it runs proxy militant forces inside Pakistan.

On many ocassions well infomred people had reported that the CIA indeed is behind many of the terrorist activites in Pakistan which were often ridiculed and written of as conspiracy theories.

Now , through their own admission , they have admitted that they use proxy militant forces inside Pakistan.

If Pakistan were ever to say such a thing that it supports a force inside Afghansitan to elimiate our enemies we all know how Pakistan will be hounded for such a statment.

 

[somebozo]

This is not a secret..any half defence person with IQ above one knows all these talibans, alquaida, TTP are CIA trained funded and will act upon orders of their feeding hand.

 

[SekrutYakhni]

This is not a secret..any half defence person with IQ above one knows all these talibans, alquaida, TTP are CIA trained funded and will act upon orders of their feeding hand.

Ideology.

You cannot persuade someone if you do not share the common base or exploit their ideology. CIA does not create groups rather exploit the ideology of the people which leads to a separatist group, you name it group--

I will give you the gun--You will kill people--

Take the example of USSR in Afghanistan.

Zia and cronies along with CIA created a hysteria of Islam vs USSR, Jihad, fight against evil etc to persuade individuals to fight.

CIA is 'the' best when it comes to bring an ideological group on the table.

 

[pakdefender]

The point here is that they are backing militant/terrorist forces inside Pakistan , whether they are giving them money only or motivating them through ideology is a beside the point.

 

[SekrutYakhni]

The point here is that they are backing militant/terrorist forces inside Pakistan , whether they are giving them money only or motivating them through ideology is a beside the point.

Take out the root, plant will never grow.

Armed solution is a must for short term.
Long term--Armed solution? Not a good strategy, no second opinion!

Sometimes I try to tell people in code words--Sometimes you have to take extreme actions to deal with extreme problems.

There is a golden line in between, take it or loose it.

What kind of people you are? What is your vision? Where are you going? Where are your policy makers? Where is the spirit, the unity, the patriotism?

You have accepted aid from KSA. Why did you accept it? We want to save millions of people? How much did KSA give you? 100 million, 200 million, 300 million, 700 million, 2 billion, how much?
You cannot come up with 500 million where the politicians are billionaire? Where the businessmen are billionaire? The foreign remittance?

Lets put it this way--If I were the President, I would not have accepted KSA aid, their men on our ground, any extreme measure. Why? The source of militancy and ideology comes from the very same groups.

A 200 million taken today would cost us 1500 lives every year in suicide attacks--trickle down--economy, social instability, you name it.

In conclusion, get the ambassador out of KSA--Look in their eyes and tell them--We are no saviours of Holy Land until unless you eliminate the support of terror in our country.

Isolating yourself is not an option in today's word; however, letting others to kill your citizens is not an option either.