Chinese were considered white until 18th century

[huckyang]

Don't be racist. God make many colors to make the world rich. No one color has all good people neither all bad people . Same as religion are all good. Only human abused it.
However looking at history the whites has tendency to commit sins more than others.

 

[Leishangthem]

Actually the average height for Punjabi Indians is 5 ft 10 in Punjab according to college statistics of Punjabi schools.

Also the average North Korean is 5 ft 4

They're nilotic tribes in Africa living in poverty where the average height is 6 ft for men

I categorize Japanese as small because after being well fed. They average at 5 ft 7 in better environments

Africans are short in Africa

However Jamaicans in the UK or African Americans in America are a lot taller than Japanese Americans

The NBA is 90% black american and the average NBA height is 6 ft 7

The average South Korean is 5 ft 8

A South Korean is basically a North Korean well fed.

The two are the same ethnic group

India is huge amounts of malnutrition, pollution and poverty

However the average urban Indian is 5 ft 8

The average rural indian is 5 ft 5

Generally North Indians are taller than South Indians because North Indians have lactose tolerance for milk and they also eat wheat too.

However south indians due to better developed states can squeeze in some tall people

This is chart comparing Indians from India

British born and raised Indians

British born and raised whites

The average Indian from India in the UK is 164 cm for men

The average British born Indian raised in the UK for 3 generations is 173 cm for male

The average Jamaican black guy is 176 cm

The average Pakistani in the UK is 175 cm

I believe Indians are naturally a lot more capable given better western environments than Japanese

However some Northern Chinese people are naturally tall people even in third world environments. View attachment 762669

The average height of men in Punjab is 168 cm(5 ft 5 ) according to NFHS (National Family Health Survey ).

Average Indian height in rural or urban isn't even close to 5 ft 8. That's totally wrong,no comprehensive national survey by central gov proves that. According to NCD RisC,done in collaboration with National Health Mindistry , the average height of Indian men men is 166 ,it's the norm in South Asian nations. Indian gov's own survey proves even less.163-162 cm is the national average based on NFHS.

You mentioned some tall african tribes,but I didn't say all tribes are small,Africa is a swath of land,some had to grow to hunt predators and had the resources to keep themselves well fed.That's your human evolution .People evolve based on need for survival.

You mentioned NBA players,Chinese CBA is also filled with big players,Chinese women's volleyball team which won Olympic gold is taller than pretty much any team in the world ,inclunding the US.The tallest player is 201 cm, as tall as NBA player.

The libero- and setter are the only exception because they are supposed to move quicker.

British born are pointless,nobody measures immigrant population's rigorously,and not all immigrants are equally welloff,like rich Indians like to migrate to UK meanwhile ,more of the political opposition of CCP and poor people flee from East Asia to the west. I mean in general case.

Actually northern Chinese are naturally taller than Japanese or Koreans or southern chinese. This is proven by regional statistics within the region

Actually most of China regardless whether its North Beijing or South Hong Kong is much developed than any part of India

However

Northern Chinese are still taller than Southern Chinese despite being less wealthier than their southern counterparts.

The average Japanese height for men is 170 cm

This means they're short by nature but just got taller through protein and better environments

Naturally tall people means in third world environments, they're still 5 ft 7 or above on average

There is at least a 5 inch difference in height potential

Chinese are ofcourse taller,did I say otherwise?

Japanese aren't the tallest of people but I would refrain from using the world short.
170 is a respectable height.

Height are the most evident in region where Diary intake is at large volume and food are consumed in large gathering with huge potions. Netherlands,Lativa which have the tallest populace,practically lives on diary. Many African tribes that have lived on red meat and milk primarily, also grew substantially tall. Meanwhile East Asians are lactose intolerant and the culture is for moderation,that prevents them from being huge like the Dutch.

An average Indian Punjabi might be much poor compared to a japanese,but the Indian consumes many times more diary product than an average Japanese would,also the potions would be vastly different in size.
So even if Japan is much more wealthy,the Punjabis are practically living in diary ,from pure milk consumption to intake in other forms like Lassi,ghee,hence Punjab is the region that has the better average height in Indian subcontinent but the average height of 168CM is still lower than East Asian nation like Japan,where people eat very small potion of sea food based meal,better for longevity but not suitable for building big body.
South Asian genetic makeup is made of Semite and archipelago people's admix .It will be smaller in body frame than East Asian ,European and Certain African regions in general.The condition in South Asia is scorching hot ,the environment and condition is unfavourable for bigger built body frame .

 

[Shazzad123]

The average height of men in Punjab is 168 cm(5 ft 5 ) according to NFHS (National Family Health Survey ).
View attachment 762703
Average Indian height in rural or urban isn't even close to 5 ft 8. That's totally wrong,no comprehensive national survey by central gov proves that. According to NCD RisC,done in collaboration with National Health Mindistry , the average height of Indian men men is 166 ,it's the norm in South Asian nations. Indian gov's own survey proves even less.163-162 cm is the national average based on NFHS.
View attachment 762706


You mentioned some tall african tribes,but I didn't say all tribes are small,Africa is a swath of land,some had to grow to hunt predators and had the resources to keep themselves well fed.That's your human evolution .People evolve based on need for survival.

You mentioned NBA players,Chinese CBA is also filled with big players,Chinese women's volleyball team which won Olympic gold is taller than pretty much any team in the world ,inclunding the US.The tallest player is 201 cm, as tall as NBA player.

The libero- and setter are the only exception because they are supposed to move quicker.

British born are pointless,nobody measures immigrant population's rigorously,and not all immigrants are equally welloff,like rich Indians like to migrate to UK meanwhile ,more of the political opposition of CCP and poor people flee from East Asia to the west. I mean in general case.





Chinese are ofcourse taller,did I say otherwise?

Japanese aren't the tallest of people but I would refrain from using the world short.
170 is a respectable height.

Height are the most evident in region where Diary intake is at large volume and food are consumed in large gathering with huge potions. Netherlands,Lativa which have the tallest populace,practically lives on diary. Many African tribes that have lived on red meat and milk primarily, also grew substantially tall. Meanwhile East Asians are lactose intolerant and the culture is for moderation,that prevents them from being huge like the Dutch.

An average Indian Punjabi might be much poor compared to a japanese,but the Indian consumes many times more diary product than an average Japanese would,also the potions would be vastly different in size.
So even if Japan is much more wealthy,the Punjabis are practically living in diary ,from pure milk consumption to intake in other forms like Lassi,ghee,hence Punjab is the region that has the better average height in Indian subcontinent but the average height of 168CM is still lower than East Asian nation like Japan,where people eat very small potion of sea food based meal,better for longevity but not suitable for building big body.
South Asian genetic makeup is made of Semite and archipelago people's admix .It will be smaller in body frame than East Asian ,European and Certain African regions in general.The condition in South Asia is scorching hot ,the environment and condition is unfavourable for bigger built body frame .

Actually the average Punjabi Jatt height is 5 ft 7

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3190178/

Indians can't consume dirty products apart from Punjabis because they're not lactose tolerant

Also nobody in India is a semite. They're Indo Aryans who are naturally tall people

Im sorry but India is way too poor compared to Japan added to corruption

A good comparison would be Punjabis raised in the UK for generations. They are way taller than Japanese or Chinese here.

Why can't you compare first world raised Indians to Japanese?

170 cm is nothing

80% of Indians don't even have proper toilets, and no, majority don't consume dairy or even have food.

Also 168 cm Punjabis in India are literally 177 cm in the UK.

See look, the average height for Urban Indians is 177 cm

https://weather.com/en-IN/india/hea...-of-nutrition-changes-ideal-weight-height-for

Of course British Indians matter

This is because the Indians who migrated to the UK were 165 cm and now those same Indians are 173 cm

The Punjabi Indians are 177 cm in the UK easily proven by statistics

The fact that even rich Indians are tall proves that nutrition and less polluted environments are keys for Indian growth

Most central asians like Mongolians have a reputation of being short. The average Mongolian soldier was 5 ft 5 on average.

There is literally no archipelago genes in any south asians

The average japanese in the 1950s was 165 cm

Most Indians are vegetarians and add to this not lactose tolerant.

Neither are Indo Aryans short nor are Dravidians really short either

170 cm is terrible for a country with a per capita of $48,000

The average Indian is literally $3000

The average North Korean is 5 ft 4. This is proof most Asians have naturally smaller frames in general

Look at North Koreans right now

Indians drink chai not full dairy and most cant even afford chai like that either.

According to British statistics on pre school studies

The average British Sikh child was born taller and heavier than the British white kids.

I know from personal experience of Asian girls that most have really small physqiues and no body frames or even breast sizes compared to Indian girls

Also Africa is humid and hot but you find tall and short tribes right next to each other

Also most Indians in Britain are literally from the Commonwealth empire days. The average Nigerian is 5 ft 4 in Nigeria and those same Nigerians are 5 ft 9 in the UK

Consuming dairy? India has literally no food.

The average Indian doesnt eat 3 square meals a day

Also the biggest Indians are always on plains not in the mountains.

These are average heights of individuals in the past

The American soldiers on the left. The Indian soldier is 4th and the ones on the right are French and Austrian soldiers.

The Japanese soldier is the one all the right on the right side. They were typically the smallest.

Also 168 cm is 5 ft 6

The average Japanese is 5 ft 7 after being well fed

Another good example are indentured servant Indians in Trinidad who have been there for generations from Bihar. Even their height is 177 cm

If you look at the average height for Indo Trinidadians. They're also taller than Japanese people already

If you look at the average height for Indo Fijians. They're also 173 cm.

All of these Indians are from Bihar

 

[Shazzad123]

The average height of men in Punjab is 168 cm(5 ft 5 ) according to NFHS (National Family Health Survey ).
View attachment 762703
Average Indian height in rural or urban isn't even close to 5 ft 8. That's totally wrong,no comprehensive national survey by central gov proves that. According to NCD RisC,done in collaboration with National Health Mindistry , the average height of Indian men men is 166 ,it's the norm in South Asian nations. Indian gov's own survey proves even less.163-162 cm is the national average based on NFHS.
View attachment 762706


You mentioned some tall african tribes,but I didn't say all tribes are small,Africa is a swath of land,some had to grow to hunt predators and had the resources to keep themselves well fed.That's your human evolution .People evolve based on need for survival.

You mentioned NBA players,Chinese CBA is also filled with big players,Chinese women's volleyball team which won Olympic gold is taller than pretty much any team in the world ,inclunding the US.The tallest player is 201 cm, as tall as NBA player.

The libero- and setter are the only exception because they are supposed to move quicker.

British born are pointless,nobody measures immigrant population's rigorously,and not all immigrants are equally welloff,like rich Indians like to migrate to UK meanwhile ,more of the political opposition of CCP and poor people flee from East Asia to the west. I mean in general case.





Chinese are ofcourse taller,did I say otherwise?

Japanese aren't the tallest of people but I would refrain from using the world short.
170 is a respectable height.

Height are the most evident in region where Diary intake is at large volume and food are consumed in large gathering with huge potions. Netherlands,Lativa which have the tallest populace,practically lives on diary. Many African tribes that have lived on red meat and milk primarily, also grew substantially tall. Meanwhile East Asians are lactose intolerant and the culture is for moderation,that prevents them from being huge like the Dutch.

An average Indian Punjabi might be much poor compared to a japanese,but the Indian consumes many times more diary product than an average Japanese would,also the potions would be vastly different in size.
So even if Japan is much more wealthy,the Punjabis are practically living in diary ,from pure milk consumption to intake in other forms like Lassi,ghee,hence Punjab is the region that has the better average height in Indian subcontinent but the average height of 168CM is still lower than East Asian nation like Japan,where people eat very small potion of sea food based meal,better for longevity but not suitable for building big body.
South Asian genetic makeup is made of Semite and archipelago people's admix .It will be smaller in body frame than East Asian ,European and Certain African regions in general.The condition in South Asia is scorching hot ,the environment and condition is unfavourable for bigger built body frame .

South Asia has way more diversity than East Asians

Punjabis aren't semite. They're Indo Aryans and their genes are similar to Iranic people

Also there is many statistics worldwide proving Indians regardless of location of origin within in India are taller and bigger than East Asians when given the same environment

Singapore is a great example

Its filled with Indians, Chinese and Malay people

80% of Indians in Singapore are from Tamil Nadu meaning South Indian Dravidians

Average human height by country - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The average Singaporean Indian is 173.4 cm

The average Singaporean Chinese is 172.3 cm

The average Singaporean Malay is 170 cm

Another good example is

The average height in Nigerian males is 5 ft 4

The average height for Liberian males is 5 ft 3

The average height for Sierra Leone is 5 ft 5

Most of the slaves who were shipped to Jamaica, America and Latin America came from these West African countries

All of them now are 5 ft 9 on average and above from statistics

South Asians, Africans, Europeans, even semites, are much taller with larger frames than east asian people

The central asians vary. The Pashtun Iranic types are tall but the Hazara Mongolian types are short.

I'm sorry but east asians are already maxed out at 170 cm. They're not getting any bigger

There is at least 5 inches of more room for Indians.

If Tamil Indians in singapore are 173 cm and those same Tamils in India are 162 cm

Then no doubt Punjabi Sikh Indians would be Anglo level in height given the same environment which is true.

 

[Shazzad123]

The average height of men in Punjab is 168 cm(5 ft 5 ) according to NFHS (National Family Health Survey ).
View attachment 762703
Average Indian height in rural or urban isn't even close to 5 ft 8. That's totally wrong,no comprehensive national survey by central gov proves that. According to NCD RisC,done in collaboration with National Health Mindistry , the average height of Indian men men is 166 ,it's the norm in South Asian nations. Indian gov's own survey proves even less.163-162 cm is the national average based on NFHS.
View attachment 762706


You mentioned some tall african tribes,but I didn't say all tribes are small,Africa is a swath of land,some had to grow to hunt predators and had the resources to keep themselves well fed.That's your human evolution .People evolve based on need for survival.

You mentioned NBA players,Chinese CBA is also filled with big players,Chinese women's volleyball team which won Olympic gold is taller than pretty much any team in the world ,inclunding the US.The tallest player is 201 cm, as tall as NBA player.

The libero- and setter are the only exception because they are supposed to move quicker.

British born are pointless,nobody measures immigrant population's rigorously,and not all immigrants are equally welloff,like rich Indians like to migrate to UK meanwhile ,more of the political opposition of CCP and poor people flee from East Asia to the west. I mean in general case.





Chinese are ofcourse taller,did I say otherwise?

Japanese aren't the tallest of people but I would refrain from using the world short.
170 is a respectable height.

Height are the most evident in region where Diary intake is at large volume and food are consumed in large gathering with huge potions. Netherlands,Lativa which have the tallest populace,practically lives on diary. Many African tribes that have lived on red meat and milk primarily, also grew substantially tall. Meanwhile East Asians are lactose intolerant and the culture is for moderation,that prevents them from being huge like the Dutch.

An average Indian Punjabi might be much poor compared to a japanese,but the Indian consumes many times more diary product than an average Japanese would,also the potions would be vastly different in size.
So even if Japan is much more wealthy,the Punjabis are practically living in diary ,from pure milk consumption to intake in other forms like Lassi,ghee,hence Punjab is the region that has the better average height in Indian subcontinent but the average height of 168CM is still lower than East Asian nation like Japan,where people eat very small potion of sea food based meal,better for longevity but not suitable for building big body.
South Asian genetic makeup is made of Semite and archipelago people's admix .It will be smaller in body frame than East Asian ,European and Certain African regions in general.The condition in South Asia is scorching hot ,the environment and condition is unfavourable for bigger built body frame .

You say the average Japanese doesn't consume a lot of dairy so doesn't get big

However even Japanese bodybuilders who use steroids and try to consume dairy have small and little frames

Even the tall Chinese guys have skinny frames

The Punjabis are tall and they're robust

The biggest Japanese bodybuilder who uses steroids and eats bunches of diets is Hidetada Yamagishi

He is 5 ft 7 and weighs 225 at max

The biggest Korean body builder is Lee Seung Cheol

He stands at 5 ft 10 and is 230 pounds

He eats everything and takes all types of anabolics and he is considered to be the largest Korean bodybuilder

Now Varinder Singh Ghuman

He is 6 ft 3 and weighs 287 pounds without nearly as much veins either

Harminder Singh

6 ft 3 275 pounds

Dalip Singh Rana

Regarded by people as the largest bodybuilder in history and also WWE wrestler

He is 7 ft 3 and 425 pounds muscle, wide shouldered

The other is a Persian and is his manager

If you look at average Punjabi male military and road photos. They look a lot bigger and robust than East Asian males

The left side are Chinese soldiers and the right side are Sikh and British soldiers

 

[Shazzad123]

The average height of men in Punjab is 168 cm(5 ft 5 ) according to NFHS (National Family Health Survey ).
View attachment 762703
Average Indian height in rural or urban isn't even close to 5 ft 8. That's totally wrong,no comprehensive national survey by central gov proves that. According to NCD RisC,done in collaboration with National Health Mindistry , the average height of Indian men men is 166 ,it's the norm in South Asian nations. Indian gov's own survey proves even less.163-162 cm is the national average based on NFHS.
View attachment 762706


You mentioned some tall african tribes,but I didn't say all tribes are small,Africa is a swath of land,some had to grow to hunt predators and had the resources to keep themselves well fed.That's your human evolution .People evolve based on need for survival.

You mentioned NBA players,Chinese CBA is also filled with big players,Chinese women's volleyball team which won Olympic gold is taller than pretty much any team in the world ,inclunding the US.The tallest player is 201 cm, as tall as NBA player.

The libero- and setter are the only exception because they are supposed to move quicker.

British born are pointless,nobody measures immigrant population's rigorously,and not all immigrants are equally welloff,like rich Indians like to migrate to UK meanwhile ,more of the political opposition of CCP and poor people flee from East Asia to the west. I mean in general case.





Chinese are ofcourse taller,did I say otherwise?

Japanese aren't the tallest of people but I would refrain from using the world short.
170 is a respectable height.

Height are the most evident in region where Diary intake is at large volume and food are consumed in large gathering with huge potions. Netherlands,Lativa which have the tallest populace,practically lives on diary. Many African tribes that have lived on red meat and milk primarily, also grew substantially tall. Meanwhile East Asians are lactose intolerant and the culture is for moderation,that prevents them from being huge like the Dutch.

An average Indian Punjabi might be much poor compared to a japanese,but the Indian consumes many times more diary product than an average Japanese would,also the potions would be vastly different in size.
So even if Japan is much more wealthy,the Punjabis are practically living in diary ,from pure milk consumption to intake in other forms like Lassi,ghee,hence Punjab is the region that has the better average height in Indian subcontinent but the average height of 168CM is still lower than East Asian nation like Japan,where people eat very small potion of sea food based meal,better for longevity but not suitable for building big body.
South Asian genetic makeup is made of Semite and archipelago people's admix .It will be smaller in body frame than East Asian ,European and Certain African regions in general.The condition in South Asia is scorching hot ,the environment and condition is unfavourable for bigger built body frame .

Also another fact I like to point out that Indian women in general are significantly more built than east asian women. All the east asian women whether they're models or they're normal people all have the same short, small physiques with small breast size and no curves either

Punjabi women generally always have more robust physiques like breast and curves

These are average Japanese women college students

These are average Punjabi women college students

You can't show me 1 Japanese, Chinese or Korean woman on planet earth who is built like these Indian women

Almost all East Asian women I know are physically small and don't have curves. Add to this, they're not tall either unless you compare them to a malnourished person.

Even the east asian women who gain weight, they gain it in a shape which their bodies can't handle.

They're usually the korean girls on the right photo and the left photo types don't look robust and healthy. They look obese

East Asian bodies can't handle being robust and big like many Indian bodies can.

 

[Leishangthem]

Actually the average Punjabi Jatt height is 5 ft 7

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3190178/

Indians can't consume dirty products apart from Punjabis because they're not lactose tolerant

Also nobody in India is a semite. They're Indo Aryans who are naturally tall people

Im sorry but India is way too poor compared to Japan added to corruption

A good comparison would be Punjabis raised in the UK for generations. They are way taller than Japanese or Chinese here.

Why can't you compare first world raised Indians to Japanese?

170 cm is nothing

80% of Indians don't even have proper toilets, and no, majority don't consume dairy or even have food.

Also 168 cm Punjabis in India are literally 177 cm in the UK.

See look, the average height for Urban Indians is 177 cm

https://weather.com/en-IN/india/hea...-of-nutrition-changes-ideal-weight-height-for

Of course British Indians matter

This is because the Indians who migrated to the UK were 165 cm and now those same Indians are 173 cm

The Punjabi Indians are 177 cm in the UK easily proven by statistics

The fact that even rich Indians are tall proves that nutrition and less polluted environments are keys for Indian growth

Most central asians like Mongolians have a reputation of being short. The average Mongolian soldier was 5 ft 5 on average.

There is literally no archipelago genes in any south asians

The average japanese in the 1950s was 165 cm

Most Indians are vegetarians and add to this not lactose tolerant.

Neither are Indo Aryans short nor are Dravidians really short either

170 cm is terrible for a country with a per capita of $48,000

The average Indian is literally $3000

The average North Korean is 5 ft 4. This is proof most Asians have naturally smaller frames in general

Look at North Koreans right now

Indians drink chai not full dairy and most cant even afford chai like that either.

According to British statistics on pre school studies

The average British Sikh child was born taller and heavier than the British white kids.

I know from personal experience of Asian girls that most have really small physqiues and no body frames or even breast sizes compared to Indian girls

Also Africa is humid and hot but you find tall and short tribes right next to each other

Also most Indians in Britain are literally from the Commonwealth empire days. The average Nigerian is 5 ft 4 in Nigeria and those same Nigerians are 5 ft 9 in the UK

Consuming dairy? India has literally no food.

The average Indian doesnt eat 3 square meals a day

Also the biggest Indians are always on plains not in the mountains.

These are average heights of individuals in the past

The American soldiers on the left. The Indian soldier is 4th and the ones on the right are French and Austrian soldiers.

The Japanese soldier is the one all the right on the right side. They were typically the smallest.

Also 168 cm is 5 ft 6

The average Japanese is 5 ft 7 after being well fed

Another good example are indentured servant Indians in Trinidad who have been there for generations from Bihar. Even their height is 177 cm

If you look at the average height for Indo Trinidadians. They're also taller than Japanese people already

If you look at the average height for Indo Fijians. They're also 173 cm.

All of these Indians are from Bihar

But Jatt is just 20% of Punjab,it's the minority ,for an ethnicitic community that probably consumes most diary in whole world ,more than dutch,I find their height pretty below par. With similar diary consumption expect Chinese to surpass Dutch.

Indians can't consume dirty products apart from Punjabis because they're not lactose tolerant

This is not true,and indians don't even understand the concept of lactose intolarency ,milk is one of the primary constituent of young ones in India,India the land of cows is the region with one of the highest milk consumption "culture" ,kids consume pure milk as well as in form of ghee,lassi etc.Diary is the most growth boosting food.

A good comparison would be Punjabis raised in the UK for generations. They are way taller than Japanese or Chinese here.

Why can't you compare first world raised Indians to Japanese?

This is loser's excuse only some south asians talk in such delusional manner,comparing some shoddy minority numbers to majority.

The average Japanese is 5 ft 7 after being well fed

A well fed Japanese eats much less than middle class Indian,and much less diary .That's why Japanese height will always hover around 171-173,but they will live much longer due to healthier diet.

See look, the average height for Urban Indians is 177 cm

https://weather.com/en-IN/india/hea...-of-nutrition-changes-ideal-weight-height-for

Where does it say the average height of Urban Indian?

That 177cm mentioned is the desired " ideal height " to be used for BMI measurement in India by NIN.
NIN clearly mentioned they determined the new criteria using the NFHS figures,which puts Indian male height avg in 163.
Indians and their delusional goal like manned moon mission in 2020,nothing new.

Also nobody in India is a semite. They're Indo Aryans who are naturally tall people
Most central asians like Mongolians have a reputation of being short. The average Mongolian soldier was 5 ft 5 on average.

So alled indo Indians are admix of semite & archipelago groups ,the senitel people you see are one of the pure ancient genestock of south asians,they all fit in R(M) haplogroup of south asia.

You can say whatever you want ,Mongolians are know as some of the heaviest built people in world,far from small,u must be living under a rock,u probably thinking bihari mixed nepali as pure East asian stock f ,someone out of loop from reality. Fact is South Asia is ranked among top 15 shortest .

You say the average Japanese doesn't consume a lot of dairy so doesn't get big

However even Japanese bodybuilders who use steroids and try to consume dairy have small and little frames

Even the tall Chinese guys have skinny frames

The Punjabis are tall and they're robust

The biggest Japanese bodybuilder who uses steroids and eats bunches of diets is Hidetada Yamagishi

He is 5 ft 7 and weighs 225 at max





The biggest Korean body builder is Lee Seung Cheol

He stands at 5 ft 10 and is 230 pounds

He eats everything and takes all types of anabolics and he is considered to be the largest Korean bodybuilder

View attachment 762844

Now Varinder Singh Ghuman

He is 6 ft 3 and weighs 287 pounds without nearly as much veins either



Harminder Singh

6 ft 3 275 pounds

View attachment 762849

Dalip Singh Rana

Regarded by people as the largest bodybuilder in history and also WWE wrestler

He is 7 ft 3 and 425 pounds muscle, wide shouldered

The other is a Persian and is his manager

View attachment 762850

If you look at average Punjabi male military and road photos. They look a lot bigger and robust than East Asian males



The left side are Chinese soldiers and the right side are Sikh and British soldiers

First body building isn't about height,and Japanese body building association don't pick their athletes based on height,I'm sure if we measure average height of all body builders in India,it will be far shorter than those of East Asia.

The sikh guards with some random soldiers which you love to quote ,the big sikh guards which are hired based on their stature and beard by British was a trademark of british raj.
But Sikh in past use to consume as much diary as now if not more,hence ,like the dutch they have always been bigger in Indian subcontinent.They wouldn't grow any bigger,for they can't consume any more milk than they already do which is already highest of world standard.

There's also sikh like this,shorter than archipelago admix japanese.Japanese faced much more food scarcity than Indians a century ago.And Japanese were never diary based nation like dutch/Lativa & Indian subcontinent.

17 years old japanese kids in some northern prefacture hits 171cm average ,meanwhile National Family Health Survey of India shows India's tallest punjab state is 168 cm 5 FT 5 for young people .

In comparison ,northern Chinese provice has an average height of 176-178 (5ft 9-5gt 10)for 19 years old.10 cm taller than punjab average .

You quote Khali who's 216c m

Here's Yao Ming229 cm,but a much superior athlete.

Also another fact I like to point out that Indian women in general are significantly more built than east asian women. All the east asian women whether they're models or they're normal people all have the same short, small physiques with small breast size and no curves either

Punjabi women generally always have more robust physiques like breast and curves

These are average Japanese women college students

View attachment 762902

These are average Punjabi women college students

View attachment 762903

You can't show me 1 Japanese, Chinese or Korean woman on planet earth who is built like these Indian women

View attachment 762904
View attachment 762905

Almost all East Asian women I know are physically small and don't have curves. Add to this, they're not tall either unless you compare them to a malnourished person.

Even the east asian women who gain weight, they gain it in a shape which their bodies can't handle.

They're usually the korean girls on the right photo and the left photo types don't look robust and healthy. They look obese



View attachment 762907

East Asian bodies can't handle being robust and big like many Indian bodies can.

East Asian bodies can't handle being robust and big like many Indian bodies can.

LOL,

These are average Japanese women college students

View attachment 762902

These are Chinese high school kids and probably taller.

Almost all East Asian women I know are physically small and don't have curves. Add to this, they're not tall either unless you compare them to a malnourished person.

Meanhwile Chinese 19 years old(163.5) are now taller than average 19 year old American(163.3) and are almost equal to south asian men ,actually taller than Indian men based on National Family health Survey by GOI.

India vs China women's volleyball match,they represents epitome of height,Chinese are taller and much stronger.

Many Young Chinese man are actually approaching 190cm and women 180cm.

This is what Indian women says about his first Impression and most shocking things after coming to China

Y'all need to stop living under a rock ,go earn money and see the world,open your horizon. Stop living under bollywood bubble where chinese are potrayed as miniature men and Indian actors( which are 10 cm shorter than Chinese actor's average height in general) as towering figure above them.

 

[Shazzad123]

But Jatt is just 20% of Punjab,it's the minority ,for an ethnicitic community that probably consumes most diary in whole world ,more than dutch,I find their height pretty below par. With similar diary consumption expect Chinese to surpass Dutch.



This is not true,and indians don't even understand the concept of lactose intolarency ,milk is one of the primary constituent of young ones in India,India the land of cows is the region with one of the highest milk consumption "culture" ,kids consume pure milk as well as in form of ghee,lassi etc.Diary is the most growth boosting food.


This is loser's excuse only some south asians talk in such delusional manner,comparing some shoddy minority numbers to majority.

A well fed Japanese eats much less than middle class Indian,and much less diary .That's why Japanese height will always hover around 171-173,but they will live much longer due to healthier diet.


Where does it say the average height of Urban Indian?

That 177cm mentioned is the desired " ideal height " to be used for BMI measurement in India by NIN.
NIN clearly mentioned they determined the new criteria using the NFHS figures,which puts Indian male height avg in 163.
Indians and their delusional goal like manned moon mission in 2020,nothing new.



So alled indo Indians are admix of semite & archipelago groups ,the senitel people you see are one of the pure ancient genestock of south asians,they all fit in R(M) haplogroup of south asia.

View attachment 762969

You can say whatever you want ,Mongolians are know as some of the heaviest built people in world,far from small,u must be living under a rock,u probably thinking bihari mixed nepali as pure East asian stock f ,someone out of loop from reality. Fact is South Asia is ranked among top 15 shortest .

View attachment 762970




First body building isn't about height,and Japanese body building association don't pick their athletes based on height,I'm sure if we measure average height of all body builders in India,it will be far shorter than those of East Asia.

The sikh guards with some random soldiers which you love to quote ,the big sikh guards which are hired based on their stature and beard by British was a trademark of british raj.
But Sikh in past use to consume as much diary as now if not more,hence ,like the dutch they have always been bigger in Indian subcontinent.They wouldn't grow any bigger,for they can't consume any more milk than they already do which is already highest of world standard.

There's also sikh like this,shorter than archipelago admix japanese.Japanese faced much more food scarcity than Indians a century ago.And Japanese were never diary based nation like dutch/Lativa & Indian subcontinent.

View attachment 762972

17 years old japanese kids in some northern prefacture hits 171cm average ,meanwhile National Family Health Survey of India shows India's tallest punjab state is 168 cm 5 FT 5 for young people .
View attachment 762985

In comparison ,northern Chinese provice has an average height of 176-178 (5ft 9-5gt 10)for 19 years old.10 cm taller than punjab average .

View attachment 762975

You quote Khali who's 216c m

Here's Yao Ming229 cm,but a much superior athlete.

LOL, View attachment 762978

These are Chinese high school kids and probably taller.



Meanhwile Chinese 19 years old(163.5) are now taller than average 19 year old American(163.3) and are almost equal to south asian men ,actually taller than Indian men based on National Family health Survey by GOI. View attachment 762977
India vs China women's volleyball match,they represents epitome of height,Chinese are taller and much stronger.

Many Young Chinese man are actually approaching 190cm and women 180cm.

View attachment 762979View attachment 762980


This is what Indian women says about his first Impression and most shocking things after coming to China

View attachment 762983
View attachment 762981
View attachment 762984
View attachment 762982

Y'all need to stop living under a rock ,go earn money and see the world,open your horizon. Stop living under bollywood bubble where chinese are potrayed as miniature men and Indian actors( which are 10 cm shorter than Chinese actor's average height in general) as towering figure above them.

Even the people you're posting are tall and skinny

Yao Ming is tall and skinny

The Khali is tall and robust

Also its hypocritical you're posting a canadian study of Indians with skeletal mass there who and then get mad when I post British Indians who are raised in the UK being taller and bigger

If we check the growth patterns for Sikh kids from birth to age 5

They're not only taller than other Indian types but also European kids too from birth to age 5

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1029972/

Heights and weights of five subgroups of Asian (545) and European children (685) were recorded after birth, at 1 year, 2 years, and at 5 years. Asian children were divided into Muslim Gujarati, Muslim Pakistani, Muslim Bangladeshi, Hindu, and Sikh. Although the Europeans were significantly the heaviest at birth (3.42 kg boys and 3.26 kg girls) when compared with any of the other groups, it was the Sikhs who had the best weight gain. They were also the heaviest at 5 years when compared with other groups, including the Europeans (20.13 kg and 19.22 kg for Sikh boys and girls respectively compared with 18.83 kg and 18.42 kg for European boys and girls respectively). Hindus had the lightest birth weight. Their weight at 5 years (17.41 kg boys and 16.93 kg girls) and that of the Muslim Gujaratis (17.27 kg boys and 17.20 kg girls) was comparable and was lowest, whereas that of the Bangladeshis at this age was the greatest among the Muslims (18.56 kg for boys and 17.87 kg for girls). Sikh boys and girls were found to be the tallest of all the groups, including the Europeans, at all periods of measurements--including at 5 years when the Sikh boys and girls were 3 cm and 1.5 cm taller than the European boys and girls. Hindus were the shortest of all the groups throughout the period of study.

This is a study of the average Singaporean Indian vs Singaporean Chinese

Average height is 173.4 cm for Indian

Average height is 172 cm for Chinese

Average weight is 69 kg for Indian men

Average weight is 65 kg for Chinese men

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931495/

80% of Indians in Singapore are Tamil Dravidians too

You still haven't post 1 chinese woman who looks robust. They all look tall and skinny, same with Chinese men.

You can't post big japanese bodybuilders because they don't exist.

 

[Leishangthem]

Even the people you're posting are tall and skinny

Yao Ming is tall and skinny

The Khali is tall and robust

Also its hypocritical you're posting a canadian study of Indians with skeletal mass there who and then get mad when I post British Indians who are raised in the UK being taller and bigger

If we check the growth patterns for Sikh kids from birth to age 5

They're not only taller than other Indian types but also European kids too from birth to age 5

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1029972/

Heights and weights of five subgroups of Asian (545) and European children (685) were recorded after birth, at 1 year, 2 years, and at 5 years. Asian children were divided into Muslim Gujarati, Muslim Pakistani, Muslim Bangladeshi, Hindu, and Sikh. Although the Europeans were significantly the heaviest at birth (3.42 kg boys and 3.26 kg girls) when compared with any of the other groups, it was the Sikhs who had the best weight gain. They were also the heaviest at 5 years when compared with other groups, including the Europeans (20.13 kg and 19.22 kg for Sikh boys and girls respectively compared with 18.83 kg and 18.42 kg for European boys and girls respectively). Hindus had the lightest birth weight. Their weight at 5 years (17.41 kg boys and 16.93 kg girls) and that of the Muslim Gujaratis (17.27 kg boys and 17.20 kg girls) was comparable and was lowest, whereas that of the Bangladeshis at this age was the greatest among the Muslims (18.56 kg for boys and 17.87 kg for girls). Sikh boys and girls were found to be the tallest of all the groups, including the Europeans, at all periods of measurements--including at 5 years when the Sikh boys and girls were 3 cm and 1.5 cm taller than the European boys and girls. Hindus were the shortest of all the groups throughout the period of study.

This is a study of the average Singaporean Indian vs Singaporean Chinese

Average height is 173.4 cm for Indian

Average height is 172 cm for Chinese

Average weight is 69 kg for Indian men

Average weight is 65 kg for Chinese men

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931495/

80% of Indians in Singapore are Tamil Dravidians too

You still haven't post 1 chinese woman who looks robust. They all look tall and skinny, same with Chinese men.

You can't post big japanese bodybuilders because they don't exist.

Did you even read? I don't doubt sikh has the most weight gain,sikh are some of the most overweight people I have ever seen in my live in general.Not the point,
What I posted is bone muscle trait based on ethnicity,totally different case.

Meanwhile you post some shoddy stats ,the Singapore one is based on conscripts not average height!

Chinese are 60% of Singapore ,meanwhile Indians just 9 % ,the conscript are overwhelmingly Chinese of southern Hakka origin,so if that's shitty comparison,if we added a small no of Chinese in Indian conscripts ,especially from northern province they would be ranked the tallest by far. It's very stupid to go and compare some imperfect and messy stats about minority,you clearly have a problem with actual gov survey with huge participants when it's not convenient.

Yes,Khali is more robust and Ming isn't as bulk,but that's what basket ball player have to be,Chinese don't want to be just balloon ,they prefer lean body aesthetic .There are bulky body builder but that's different.

You live in a bubble ,thinking some bihari mixed tibetan mountain breed nepali as Chinese or typical east asian from O haplogroup .Stop living in the cave .Atleast note what the Indian woman said from her,she's a typical indian with mindset like you before seeing the reality ,South Asian has been calling themselves,wealthy,genius,tall and whatnot by themselves .

 

[Shazzad123]

But Jatt is just 20% of Punjab,it's the minority ,for an ethnicitic community that probably consumes most diary in whole world ,more than dutch,I find their height pretty below par. With similar diary consumption expect Chinese to surpass Dutch.



This is not true,and indians don't even understand the concept of lactose intolarency ,milk is one of the primary constituent of young ones in India,India the land of cows is the region with one of the highest milk consumption "culture" ,kids consume pure milk as well as in form of ghee,lassi etc.Diary is the most growth boosting food.


This is loser's excuse only some south asians talk in such delusional manner,comparing some shoddy minority numbers to majority.

A well fed Japanese eats much less than middle class Indian,and much less diary .That's why Japanese height will always hover around 171-173,but they will live much longer due to healthier diet.


Where does it say the average height of Urban Indian?

That 177cm mentioned is the desired " ideal height " to be used for BMI measurement in India by NIN.
NIN clearly mentioned they determined the new criteria using the NFHS figures,which puts Indian male height avg in 163.
Indians and their delusional goal like manned moon mission in 2020,nothing new.



So alled indo Indians are admix of semite & archipelago groups ,the senitel people you see are one of the pure ancient genestock of south asians,they all fit in R(M) haplogroup of south asia.

View attachment 762969

You can say whatever you want ,Mongolians are know as some of the heaviest built people in world,far from small,u must be living under a rock,u probably thinking bihari mixed nepali as pure East asian stock f ,someone out of loop from reality. Fact is South Asia is ranked among top 15 shortest .

View attachment 762970




First body building isn't about height,and Japanese body building association don't pick their athletes based on height,I'm sure if we measure average height of all body builders in India,it will be far shorter than those of East Asia.

The sikh guards with some random soldiers which you love to quote ,the big sikh guards which are hired based on their stature and beard by British was a trademark of british raj.
But Sikh in past use to consume as much diary as now if not more,hence ,like the dutch they have always been bigger in Indian subcontinent.They wouldn't grow any bigger,for they can't consume any more milk than they already do which is already highest of world standard.

There's also sikh like this,shorter than archipelago admix japanese.Japanese faced much more food scarcity than Indians a century ago.And Japanese were never diary based nation like dutch/Lativa & Indian subcontinent.

View attachment 762972

17 years old japanese kids in some northern prefacture hits 171cm average ,meanwhile National Family Health Survey of India shows India's tallest punjab state is 168 cm 5 FT 5 for young people .
View attachment 762985

In comparison ,northern Chinese provice has an average height of 176-178 (5ft 9-5gt 10)for 19 years old.10 cm taller than punjab average .

View attachment 762975

You quote Khali who's 216c m

Here's Yao Ming229 cm,but a much superior athlete.

LOL, View attachment 762978

These are Chinese high school kids and probably taller.



Meanhwile Chinese 19 years old(163.5) are now taller than average 19 year old American(163.3) and are almost equal to south asian men ,actually taller than Indian men based on National Family health Survey by GOI. View attachment 762977
India vs China women's volleyball match,they represents epitome of height,Chinese are taller and much stronger.

Many Young Chinese man are actually approaching 190cm and women 180cm.

View attachment 762979View attachment 762980


This is what Indian women says about his first Impression and most shocking things after coming to China

View attachment 762983
View attachment 762981
View attachment 762984
View attachment 762982

Y'all need to stop living under a rock ,go earn money and see the world,open your horizon. Stop living under bollywood bubble where chinese are potrayed as miniature men and Indian actors( which are 10 cm shorter than Chinese actor's average height in general) as towering figure above them.

Nobody in India looks like those sentinlese at all.

Most Mongols are short and small, they don't weigh much. The shortest people in India are Northeast Indians who are genetically more related to Chinese than mainland Indians

That study you posted could have been Northeast Indians bringing down the average in Canada

South Asian isnt an ethnic group

There is Indo Aryan, Iranic, Scythian, Dravidian, Sino Tibetan and Austro Asiatic in India

Your study might have been the Sino Tibetans mixed into the study

Average height for North Korean is 165 cm for men with 170 cm being the max

https://www.youngpioneertours.com/average-height-koreans/

Also Bihari mixed?

There is millions of those Bihari types in places like Trinidad and Fiji who are also taller than Chinese people

80% of the indentured servants in Trinidad are from Bihar generations ago

Same for Indians in Fiji

All those Indians are 174 cm for males on those islands now.

 

[Leishangthem]

Nobody in India looks like those sentinlese at all.

Most Mongols are short and small, they don't weigh much. The shortest people in India are Northeast Indians who are genetically more related to Chinese than mainland Indians

That study you posted could have been Northeast Indians bringing down the average in Canada

South Asian isnt an ethnic group

There is Indo Aryan, Iranic, Scythian, Dravidian, Sino Tibetan and Austro Asiatic in India

Your study might have been the Sino Tibetans mixed into the study

Average height for North Korean is 165 cm for men with 170 cm being the max

https://www.youngpioneertours.com/average-height-koreans/

View attachment 762987

Nobody in India looks like those sentinlese at all.

Indians has the trait,in eyes,skin ,hair ,the haplogroup is same,dravidians are closest in physical aspect.Indo aryan is a new concept, it's the mix of people from dravidian - semite of arabic region. The main haplogroup of Indian is R (or M).It's science ,not my opinion.

Most Mongols are short and small, they don't weigh much.

You need to educate yourself more;you will make a fool for yourself if you said that about Mongol in genealogy forum .
Mongolia also produces the most dominant sumo wrestlers ,huge in size and strong ,this guy is champion 192cm Hakuho sho.His thrust power is equal to a head on collision with a car at high speed.

The shortest people in India are Northeast Indians who are genetically more related to Chinese than mainland Indians
That study you posted could have been Northeast Indians bringing down the average in Canada

East Indians are never included in such survey,for they are completely different in gene than Indians from mainland.
Did they mentioned they included NE Indians? 100 % chance they weren't,for they are completely different than indians ,they re never included in "Indian-Indian" surveys. They would have mentioned otherwise.

The shortest people based on Indian Gov Survey is in mainland-Jharkhand ,bihar etc not in NE.

And not all of northeast India is directly linked to Chinese,
The people in Meghalaya/assam are Khashi ,they are southern archipelago people and speak Austroasiatic khmer language came through Bangladesh corridor and might have some bengal mix?,they are the shortest in NE.

people of Arunachal are part of D haplogroup of Tibetans slightly different than Han Chinese ,of O -haplo group.They aren't very tall.
The Angami nagas are some of the best built people in India ,they would stand high above avg immigrants on their land,they are more close to the mongol & east asian group.

Naga woman are ranked tallest in India and pretty popular in modeling due to height.

In Manipur Imphal ,the indigenous sino-tibetan Metei aren't small either.

sis can barely fit in SUV.These aren't people with short genetic makeup.Here you can find people with O Haplogroup consistant in Eastern part of asia.With the dominant one of meitei being O-page 23

NE region suffered from abject povert and milk consumption isn't popular either,it's not short as you think.WiTH diary consumption and improved nutrition standard ,they can grow in east asian standard.

You can't lump them all with Nepali and Khasi and such.

If manipur was so weak muscled,the tiny state with 2 million population wouldn't be the state with highest medal tally in National games .

Average height for North Korean is 165 cm for men with 170 cm being the max

https://www.youngpioneertours.com/average-height-koreans/

View attachment 762987

In Nk millions died due to hunger,it's not supposed to be a merit for comparison.Even than the people look far more consistent in height and taller than what you would see in streets of south Asia.

 

[Shazzad123]

Indians has the trait,in eyes,skin ,hair ,the haplogroup is same,dravidians are very closest in physical aspect.Indo aryan is a new concept it's the mix of people from dravidian - semite of arabic region. The main haplogroup of Indian is R (or M).It's science ,not my opinion.


You need to educate yourself more;you will make a fool for yourself if you said that about Mongol in genealogy forum .
Mongolia also produces the most dominant sumo wrestlers huge in size and strong ,this guy is champion 192cm hakuho sho.His thrust power is equal to a head on collision with a car at high speed.

View attachment 762988


East Indians are never included in such survey,for they are completely different in gene than Indians from mainland.

Did they mentioned they included NE Indians? 100 % chance they weren't,for they are completely different than indians ,they re never included in "Indian-Indian" surveys. They would have mentioned otherwise.

The shortest people based on Indian Gov Survey is in mainland-Jharkhand ,bihar etc not not NE.

And not all of northeast India is directly linked to Chinese,
The people in Meghalaya/assam are Khashi ,they are southern archipelago people and speak austroasiatic khmer language came through Bangladesh and has little bengali mix,they are the shortest in NE.View attachment 762997


people of Arunachal are part of R haplogroup of Tibetans slightly different than Han Chinese ,of O -haplo group.
The Angami nagas are some of the best built people in India ,they would stand a feet above avg immigrants on their land,they are more close to the mongol subgroup.
View attachment 762989

Naga woman are ranked tallest in India and pretty popular in modeling due to height.

View attachment 762990View attachment 762991
In Manipur Imphal ,the indigenous sino-tibetan Metei aren't small either.
View attachment 762992
sis can barely fit in SUV.

NE region suffers from abject povert and milk consumption isn't popular either,it's not short as you think.WiTH diary and improved living standard they can grow in east asian standard.


Here you can find people with O Haplogroup consistant in Eastern part of asia.With the dominant one of meitei being O-page 23
View attachment 762993



You can't lump them all with nepali and khasi.

If manipur was so weak muscled,the tiny state with 2 million population wouldn't be the state with highest medal tally in National games .

View attachment 762994



In Nk millions died due to hunger,it's not supposed to be a merit for comparison.Even than the people look far more consistent in height and taller than what you would see in streets of south Asia.

Indo Aryans such as Punjabis carry R1a which is like R1a in some West Asian and Southeastern European types



Arabs have J1 haplogroup which is really less and almost non existent in India

Also I never claimed Nepalis to be weak. I said they're small and skinny. They're obviously good at gymnastics and are flexible people in general.

Also North Koreans are what average East Asians without food would look like, well at least, its what south koreans would look like

 

[Shazzad123]

Indians has the trait,in eyes,skin ,hair ,the haplogroup is same,dravidians are closest in physical aspect.Indo aryan is a new concept, it's the mix of people from dravidian - semite of arabic region. The main haplogroup of Indian is R (or M).It's science ,not my opinion.


You need to educate yourself more;you will make a fool for yourself if you said that about Mongol in genealogy forum .
Mongolia also produces the most dominant sumo wrestlers huge in size and strong ,this guy is champion 192cm hakuho sho.His thrust power is equal to a head on collision with a car at high speed.

View attachment 762988


East Indians are never included in such survey,for they are completely different in gene than Indians from mainland.

Did they mentioned they included NE Indians? 100 % chance they weren't,for they are completely different than indians ,they re never included in "Indian-Indian" surveys. They would have mentioned otherwise.

The shortest people based on Indian Gov Survey is in mainland-Jharkhand ,bihar etc not not NE.

And not all of northeast India is directly linked to Chinese,
The people in Meghalaya/assam are Khashi ,they are southern archipelago people and speak austroasiatic khmer language came through Bangladesh and might have bengali mix?,they are the shortest in NE.View attachment 762997


people of Arunachal are part of D haplogroup of Tibetans slightly different than Han Chinese ,of O -haplo group.
The Angami nagas are some of the best built people in India ,they would stand high above avg immigrants on their land,they are more close to the mongol chinese subgroup.
View attachment 762989

Naga woman are ranked tallest in India and pretty popular in modeling due to height.

View attachment 762990View attachment 762991
In Manipur Imphal ,the indigenous sino-tibetan Metei aren't small either.
View attachment 762992
sis can barely fit in SUV.These aren't people with short genetic makeup


Here you can find people with O Haplogroup consistant in Eastern part of asia.With the dominant one of meitei being O-page 23
View attachment 762993

NE region suffers from abject povert and milk consumption isn't popular either,it's not short as you think.WiTH diary and improved nutrition standard ,they can grow in east asian standard.

You can't lump them all with nepali and khasi.

If manipur was so weak muscled,the tiny state with 2 million population wouldn't be the state with highest medal tally in National games .

View attachment 762994



In Nk millions died due to hunger,it's not supposed to be a merit for comparison.Even than the people look far more consistent in height and taller than what you would see in streets of south Asia.

Naga women are nowhere near the tallest in India

Kashmiri women are the tallest for women

152 cm is the average Naga woman

Also what is the point for milk consumption for them?

They're not lactose tolerant anyways.

Also the guys you posted aren't built great at all

This is what built looks like

Average village wrestlers in North India

Those guys you posted are short with wide bellies.

The best wrestlers in India aren't even in Nagaland

They're in Haryana and Punjab

 

[Leishangthem]

Naga women are nowhere near the tallest in India

Kashmiri women are the tallest for women

152 cm is the average Naga woman

Also what is the point for milk consumption for them?

They're not lactose tolerant anyways.

View attachment 762998

Also the guys you posted aren't built great at all

This is what built looks like

Average village wrestlers in North India

Those guys you posted are short with wide bellies.

The best wrestlers in India aren't even in Nagaland

They're in Haryana and Punjab


View attachment 763000

View attachment 763001

View attachment 763002

View attachment 763003

According to National Family Health Survey. Naga women are among tallest .

Again ,the women I quoted are all angami,not all Naga are angami,some Naga are form other parts of asia they are smaller. If I count angami only I have no doubt they are taller than Kashmiri women.Manipur is also 50% immigrant and other different community, their main group's height isn't represented well.Not everyone is same in the region.People differ by ethnicity.

Average village wrestlers in North India

Those guys you posted are short with wide bellies.

The best wrestlers in India aren't even in Nagaland

They're in Haryana and Punjab


View attachment 763000

View attachment 763001

View attachment 763002

View attachment 763003

You quoted,some juiced wrestler to average Angami nagaaverage Indian looks either stick thin or over weight in general,and no ,the angami old men aren't shorter than these wrestlers.
Go to angami village and see for yourself,they are very consistent in height and build.
Indian body has most extra fat ,they look like baloon,while other race especially east asians has more lean muscle and bone muscle.

Indo Aryans such as Punjabis carry R1a which is like R1a in some West Asian and Southeastern European types



Arabs have J1 haplogroup which is really less and almost non existent in India

Also I never claimed Nepalis to be weak. I said they're small and skinny. They're obviously good at gymnastics and are flexible people in general.

Also North Koreans are what average East Asians without food would look like, well at least, its what south koreans would look like

The indian haplogroup of R1a1 is new and formed by mix of dravidain and semite /eurasian mix and developed based on condition of South Asia.

 

[Shazzad123]

According to National Family Health Survey. Naga women are among tallest .
View attachment 763004

Again ,the women I quoted are all angami,not all Naga are angami,some Naga are form southern asia they are smaller. If I count angami only I have no doubt they are taller than Kashmiri women.Manipur is also 50% immigrant and other different community than main group's height isn't represented well.Not everyone is same in the region.People differ by ethnicity.


You quoted,some juced wrestler to average Angami nagaaverage Indian looks either stick thin or over weight in general,and no ,the angami old men aren't shorter than these wrestlers.
Go to angami village and see for yourself,they are very consistent in height and build.
Indian body has most extra fat ,they look like baloon,while other race especially east asians has more lean muscle and bone muscle.


View attachment 763010
The indian haplogroup of R1a1 is new and formed by mix of dravidain and semite /eurasian mix and developed based on condition of South Asia.

Indian R1a M17 is the same one found in Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of Tajikistan

It has nothing to do with that

Also those wrestlers arent juiced.

And even if East Asians were juiced, they still look smaller than Indians

Like I said, you still haven't posted 1 east asian bodybuilder pass 6 ft 4 and over 285 pounds of muscle.

Most east asians are skinny and built like sticks and even when they juice up. They never get huge.

They literally never get huge

I've never in my whole entire life whether on television or real life met an east asian guy who was 6 ft 4 and 278 pounds of robust muscle

Almost all east asians including the east asians who workout are all tiny and small

I've seen 6 ft 4 tall and muscled whites and blacks. There is even Arabs who can be big like Big Ramy but I have never seen an East Asian regardless of whether theyre juiced or not that is huge

Show me 1 East Asian guy at this build

Hes 6 ft 4 and 275 pounds of muscle Punjabi

Neither are they born big nor do they get big

They just get more veins

Even on your statistic. The Naga women are still smaller than Kashmiri and Punjabi women

You prove nothing posting already known stats.

Average east asian bodybuilder before and after steroids

They just get veins not muscle mass, they get leaner but not bulkier. Their bone mass is small in general and frames don't fill up properly

Also the height statistic I posted is the same statistic you posted before that you used for Punjabi men

Your northeast Indian women are all short chinese types

The NFHS survey on your chart shows Naga women at 152.6 cm

They show Kashmiri women at 154.7

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/156482651103200103