Chinese professor calls Hong Kong people 'dogs'

[StormShadow]

looks like it is time to separate hong kong from the mainland. Time for hong kong to hand over their port to us.

Saner comments expected from Indian members.

 

[xizhimen]

The Betrayal of 1962 .... and since then you stand exposed in front of us?

What did you gain (or actualy lose) from 1962 ..... perhaps, Mao is still regretting the betrayal in his grave.

1962 was China's strategic blunder ..... and nobody knows if there was any tactical gain either.

what did we gain?not much,a landslide victory.

 

[Kevrai]

Hong kong people would abandon mainlanders and kiss upto the white man. Their roads and habours are named after British, their legal system is British, their education system is british.
Being ruled by the British dogs and listening to British media propaganda have brainwashed these guys.

Let's hope hong kong people turn out like Chinese-dragon by showing love to the mainland.
But im not holding my breath.

The whites are the biggest threat to the human species.
They have brainwashed so many millions.

looks like we have a Chinese Hitler here on pdf

 

[AADHAAR]

what did we gain?not much,a landslide victory.

Really ... is this how Chinese define a "landslide victory"?

Perhaps, the area is prone to too many landslides ...

So, you withdrew because of landslides .... hence, no tactical gains either.

And still paying for the strategic blunder .... Mao Mao, how could you be so harsh to your next generations .... !

 

[xizhimen]

Really ... is this how Chinese define a "landslide victory"?

Perhaps, the area is prone to too many landslides ...

So, you withdrew because of landslides .... hence, no tactical gains either.

And still paying for the strategic blunder .... Mao Mao, how could you be so harsh to your next generations .... !

what are we paying for?can you be more specific

 

[skyknight]

Actually what Professor Kong said is：Some HongKong people are dogs. It is only a personal perspective

 

[AADHAAR]

what are we paying for?can you be more specific

It's not hard to imagine ... and playout the 1960s .. right up to today.

Easy ... a pacifist India of 1950s could very likely have been lured into signing NPT right there in 1970. Since, Nehru-era pacifism would have believed that India should encourage every other country to give up nuclear weapons... even China, eventually.

1962 was a very cheap price to unravel chinese betrayal.

If China had betrayed later, perhaps it would have been too late for us .... and China could have been facing a non-nuclear India in 2012.

Yes, in the 1970s India would have still fought conventional wars with Pakistan; Bangladesh would still have been created. But India never wanted nuclear weapons against Pakistan.

China lost a neutral neighbour .... at the very least.

Yes, we would have still become at economic rival, to say the least, with significantly more complicated route to nuclear weapons possession ... after signing the NPT.

From china's perspective, Mao was a fool to open his cards too soon in 1962.

Off course, good for India ... it was cheapest way to unravelling china's betrayal.

 

[xizhimen]

It's not hard to imagine ... and playout the 1960s .. right up to today.

Easy ... a pacifist India of 1950s could very likely have been lured into signing NPT right there in 1970. Since, Nehru-era pacifism would have believed that India should encourage every other country to give up nuclear weapons... even China, eventually.

1962 was a very cheap price to unravel chinese betrayal.

If China had betrayed later, perhaps it would have been too late for us .... and China could have been facing a non-nuclear India in 2012.

Yes, in the 1970s India would have still fought conventional wars with Pakistan; Bangladesh would still have been created. But India never wanted nuclear weapons against Pakistan.

China lost a neutral neighbour .... at the very least.

Yes, we would have still become at economic rival, to say the least, with significantly more complicated route to nuclear weapons possession ... after signing the NPT.

From china's perspective, Mao was a fool to open his cards too soon in 1962.

Off course, good for India ... it was cheapest way to unravelling china's betrayal.

haha,very funny logic,India as a big nation is just too natural for it to have nuclear weapons,we never thought otherwise.and now you have to face two arch enemies in your immediate neighborhood.it was your leaders blunder to bring you into this mess.

 

[AADHAAR]

haha,very funny logic,India as a big nation is just too natural for it to have nuclear weapons,we never thought otherwise.and now you have to face two arch enemies in your immediate neighborhood.it was your leaders blunder to bring you into this mess.

By "two arch enemies" if you refer to Pakistan ... India doesn't consider it an enemy.

Yes, it's a troubled neighbourhood ... and we're concerned about them. But the problem of terrorism has to be dealt with separately (can't be handled with conventional wars).

 

[Aramsogo]

haha,very funny logic,India as a big nation is just too natural for it to have nuclear weapons,we never thought otherwise.and now you have to face two arch enemies in your immediate neighborhood.it was your leaders blunder to bring you into this mess.

Forget it, India does not even have a working school bus sized hydrogen bomb.

 

[xizhimen]

By "two arch enemies" if you refer to Pakistan ... India doesn't consider it an enemy.

oh,nice to hear that.but most Indians do.

 

[rcrmj]

The Betrayal of 1962 .... and since then you stand exposed in front of us?

What did you gain (or actualy lose) from 1962 ..... perhaps, Mao is still regretting the betrayal in his grave.

1962 was China's strategic blunder ..... and nobody knows if there was any tactical gain either.

the main gain is to shut the lousy nature and wannabe indians quite for 4 decades

 

[AADHAAR]

the main gain is to shut the lousy nature and wannabe indians quite for 4 decades

a poor attempt at justifying a mistake, now committed... hardly deserves a response.

 

[AADHAAR]

Forget it, India does not even have a working school bus sized hydrogen bomb.

Oh yeah, all china has to worry about is bows and arrows ... so, sleep cool.

 

[cloud_9]

He was one of the Confucius Peace Prize Judges.

I think he's one of those attention woores