What's new

Chinese media equates Azad Kashmir and Taiwan, says India should say yes to CPEC

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
India should cooperate in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) despite it passing through Azad Kashmir, in the same way Beijing doesn’t object to New Delhi having economic ties with Taipei, the state media argued on Monday.

Equating the status of the disputed region of Azad Kashmir with Taiwan as a “sovereignty” issue, the comment piece in the state media argued that India should be “pragmatic” about the CPEC and participate in the $46 billion project for economic benefits.

The Communist country sees Taiwan as a breakaway region. India’s argument against the CPEC – part of the larger China-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) connectivity project – has been that it violates India’s sovereignty.

China doesn’t object to India-Taiwan trade ties. So, New Delhi should not only have no problem with China-Pakistan economic ties through the CPEC but it should actively join in them, the article argued.

Taiwan, an independent democracy with a free press, is officially known as the Republic of China and was the island where Kuomintang rebels fled after losing the civil war to the Communist Party of China in 1949.

Since then, Beijing claims Taiwan as a breakaway region to be reunited by force if necessary. A majority of countries, including India, follow the “One-China” policy or the policy of recognising China’s authority, not Taiwan’s.

But many countries such as India also maintain trade and economic ties with Taiwan – so does China itself, while calling it one of its “provinces”.

India-Taiwan trade stands at around $5 billion while China-Taiwan trade, according to state media, was nearly $180 billion in 2016.

Long Xingchun from the Centre for Indian Studies at China West Normal University equated Taiwan’s status with the status of Azad Kashmir, which India claims as its territory.

“Beijing has reiterated its stance on the India-Pakistan disputes over Kashmir many times. Just like the Taiwan question, Beijing doesn't object to any economic links between Taiwan and other countries including India, because economic activities won't alter China's sovereignty over the island,” Long wrote in the piece for the nationalistic tabloid Global Times.

Long said: “The CPEC won't affect the status quo of Kashmir disputes. The project itself is an economic plan set to connect China and Pakistan and advance Pakistan's economy and improve the lives of its people.

“The investment from Chinese companies and their participation in some architectural construction won't affect the situation of Kashmir either,” he said. “Hence, India should be flexible and pragmatic, and be more open to economic activities in the Kashmir region conducted by Chinese companies.”

The CPEC, Long said, could be brought to Kashmir, which China and its media refer to as India-administered Kashmir, to alleviate poverty.

“The CPEC, however, will boost the economic development in the region, bringing jobs and improving the quality of life. The project can be extended to the India-administered Kashmir area if India allows, and benefit the Indian people, as well as regional stability.”



http://www.hindustantimes.com/world...yes-to-cpec/story-II1QyvAvp0CiKPsafbAZ5K.html
 
. .
Why is china so desperate for indian "Yes". ?
If you think you are right, you just go ahead with it.
India have registered the objection and are done with it. Its your call now. Even if you continue with it, nobody is going to held you by your collar. But it just sets the precedence for further activities in some other place and some other time.
 
.
Why is china so desperate for indian "Yes". ?
If you think you are right, you just go ahead with it.
India have registered the objection and are done with it. Its your call now. Even if you continue with it, nobody is going to held you by your collar. But it just sets the precedence for further activities in some other place and some other time.
they are so much desperate that they ignored indian objection and started work on cpec.
 
. .
But it just sets the precedence for further activities in some other place and some other time.

The subtlety of the statements appearing in the Chinese media are probably lost in Pakistan.
 
.
CPEC next stage should involve whole of the Kashmir as its illegally occupied by indian forces and Pakistan takes it as IOK, which is the same status as on UN disputed issues list...

What ever indain people of its modi gov says . the reality is its disputed land and india is illegally occupied it... so we should extend all favors and support for Kashmiri freedom fighters... be is CPEC or any other...
 
.
Which Chinese Media is referred by Hindustan Times that at-least should mention a reference for a cross check let alone discussing the content first.
 
.
Which Chinese Media is referred by Hindustan Times that at-least should mention a reference for a cross check let alone discussing the content first.
Sir, FYI the semi official links, Economic times and Hindustan Times are referring to.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1036227.shtml

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...s-india-to-back-cpec/articleshow/57499624.cms
 
.
New Delhi’s objection to CPEC in Kashmir not to its own benefit
By Long Xingchun Source:Global Times Published: 2017/3/6 11:58:39
10


India has argued that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) poses threat to its sovereignty in Kashmir since the Beijing-initiated project goes through the disputed area that India claims. With its continuous opposition toward the CPEC, New Delhi has lodged protests against Beijing and expressed its disapproval of the project many times, triggering a new India-China friction point. That explains why India has downplayed the China-led Belt and Road initiative which includes the CPEC.

China is neutral on the India-Pakistan dispute over Kashmir. Since 1947, claims over the territory have led to two massive wars between India and Pakistan, with continuation of sporadic armed clashes in the past decades. China, along with the majority of the international community, remains neutral and hopes the dispute could be solved through peace talks.

When the China-Pakistan boundary agreement regarding the Xinjiang-Kashmir border was signed in 1963, both sides agreed that it was a temporary pact, and China will have negotiations with the regional administration after the disputes are solved. Despite the lukewarm China-India relations and the strengthened China-Pakistan relations later, China still stands firm with the agreement in show of China's diplomatic principles and goodwill to India, which New Delhi should recognize and appreciate.

The CPEC won't affect the status quo of Kashmir disputes. The project itself is an economic plan set to connect China and Pakistan and advance Pakistan's economy and improve the lives of its people. The investment from Chinese companies and their participation in some architectural construction won't affect the situation of Kashmir either.

Beijing has reiterated its stance on the India-Pakistan disputes over Kashmir many times. Just like the Taiwan question, Beijing doesn't object any economic links between Taiwan and other countries including India, because economic activities won't alter China's sovereignty over the island.

Hence, India should be flexible and pragmatic, and be more open to economic activities in the Kashmir region conducted by Chinese companies.

Clashes have impeded the economic development of both India and Pakistan as violence and terrorism led to underdevelopment and poverty in Kashmir. The CPEC, however, will boost the economic development in the region, bringing jobs and improving the quality of life. The project can be extended to the India-administered Kashmir area if India allows, and benefit the Indian people, as well as regional stability.

The Kashmir dispute should be solved through pragmatism. Conflicts in the past 70 years show that both sides have their own reasons to insist their claims. But, wars waged by the two countries armed with nuclear weapons are not likely to end the dispute, but will only impede domestic development.

There are politicians and public figures from India and Pakistan advocating for pragmatism in resolving the dispute of the India-Pakistan border dispute according to the Line of Control. This will help remove the barrier and improve the ties.

The author is a research fellow at the Charhar Institute and director of the Center for Indian Studies at China West Normal University. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn



Sir, FYI the semi official links, Economic times and Hindustan Times are referring to.

Check the subject and difference of article. IMO, it is the opinion of writer.
 
.
they are so much desperate that they ignored indian objection and started work on cpec.

You just nailed Indians so badly, they're the ones who is so desperate to get attention since China and Pakistan ignored India objection of CPEC:rofl:.

India or china cannot tell Pakistan what to do and what not to do in Azad Kashmir.
It is Pakistani territory, and India is irrelevant in CPEC.

I don't think China is telling Pakistan what to do, it only asking India to cooperate over CPEC, of course it needs Pakistan approval.

CPEC next stage should involve whole of the Kashmir as its illegally occupied by indian forces and Pakistan takes it as IOK, which is the same status as on UN disputed issues list...

What ever indain people of its modi gov says . the reality is its disputed land and india is illegally occupied it... so we should extend all favors and support for Kashmiri freedom fighters... be is CPEC or any other...

Pakistan should ask India to declare the "One Pakistan" :azn: before allowing Indian participation on CPEC :lol:
 
.
New Delhi’s objection to CPEC in Kashmir not to its own benefit
By Long Xingchun Source:Global Times Published: 2017/3/6 11:58:39
10


India has argued that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) poses threat to its sovereignty in Kashmir since the Beijing-initiated project goes through the disputed area that India claims. With its continuous opposition toward the CPEC, New Delhi has lodged protests against Beijing and expressed its disapproval of the project many times, triggering a new India-China friction point. That explains why India has downplayed the China-led Belt and Road initiative which includes the CPEC.

China is neutral on the India-Pakistan dispute over Kashmir. Since 1947, claims over the territory have led to two massive wars between India and Pakistan, with continuation of sporadic armed clashes in the past decades. China, along with the majority of the international community, remains neutral and hopes the dispute could be solved through peace talks.

When the China-Pakistan boundary agreement regarding the Xinjiang-Kashmir border was signed in 1963, both sides agreed that it was a temporary pact, and China will have negotiations with the regional administration after the disputes are solved. Despite the lukewarm China-India relations and the strengthened China-Pakistan relations later, China still stands firm with the agreement in show of China's diplomatic principles and goodwill to India, which New Delhi should recognize and appreciate.

The CPEC won't affect the status quo of Kashmir disputes. The project itself is an economic plan set to connect China and Pakistan and advance Pakistan's economy and improve the lives of its people. The investment from Chinese companies and their participation in some architectural construction won't affect the situation of Kashmir either.

Beijing has reiterated its stance on the India-Pakistan disputes over Kashmir many times. Just like the Taiwan question, Beijing doesn't object any economic links between Taiwan and other countries including India, because economic activities won't alter China's sovereignty over the island.

Hence, India should be flexible and pragmatic, and be more open to economic activities in the Kashmir region conducted by Chinese companies.

Clashes have impeded the economic development of both India and Pakistan as violence and terrorism led to underdevelopment and poverty in Kashmir. The CPEC, however, will boost the economic development in the region, bringing jobs and improving the quality of life. The project can be extended to the India-administered Kashmir area if India allows, and benefit the Indian people, as well as regional stability.

The Kashmir dispute should be solved through pragmatism. Conflicts in the past 70 years show that both sides have their own reasons to insist their claims. But, wars waged by the two countries armed with nuclear weapons are not likely to end the dispute, but will only impede domestic development.

There are politicians and public figures from India and Pakistan advocating for pragmatism in resolving the dispute of the India-Pakistan border dispute according to the Line of Control. This will help remove the barrier and improve the ties.

The author is a research fellow at the Charhar Institute and director of the Center for Indian Studies at China West Normal University. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn





Check the subject and difference of article. IMO, it is the opinion of writer.
Global times is known as CPC mouthpiece and whichever massage they can't give officially, that is given by this semi official website. And yes being two different news obviously subject & matter both will be different. Thank you.
 
.
Kashmir is disputed territory.

Taiwan is not disputed territory between two nations.

Taiwan is a breakaway province.
 
. .
Chinese media equates Azad Kashmir and Taiwan, says India should agree to CPEC
WORLD Updated: Mar 06, 2017 22:46 IST
upload_2017-3-7_12-42-45.png

India should cooperate in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) despite it passing through Azad Kashmir, in the same way Beijing doesn’t object to New Delhi having economic ties with Taipei, the state media argued on Monday.

Equating the status of the disputed region of Azad Kashmir with Taiwan as a “sovereignty” issue, the comment piece in the state media argued that India should be “pragmatic” about the CPEC and participate in the $46 billion project for economic benefits.

The Communist country sees Taiwan as a breakaway region. India’s argument against the CPEC – part of the larger China-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) connectivity project – has been that it violates India’s sovereignty.

China doesn’t object to India-Taiwan trade ties. So, New Delhi should not only have no problem with China-Pakistan economic ties through the CPEC but it should actively join in them, the article argued.

Taiwan, an independent democracy with a free press, is officially known as the Republic of China and was the island where Kuomintang rebels fled after losing the civil war to the Communist Party of China in 1949.

Since then, Beijing claims Taiwan as a breakaway region to be reunited by force if necessary. A majority of countries, including India, follow the “One-China” policy or the policy of recognising China’s authority, not Taiwan’s.

But many countries such as India also maintain trade and economic ties with Taiwan – so does China itself, while calling it one of its “provinces”.


India-Taiwan trade stands at around $5 billion while China-Taiwan trade, according to state media, was nearly $180 billion in 2016.

Long Xingchun from the Centre for Indian Studies at China West Normal University equated Taiwan’s status with the status of Azad Kashmir, which India claims as its territory.

“Beijing has reiterated its stance on the India-Pakistan disputes over Kashmir many times. Just like the Taiwan question, Beijing doesn't object to any economic links between Taiwan and other countries including India, because economic activities won't alter China's sovereignty over the island,” Long wrote in the piece for the nationalistic tabloid Global Times.

Long said: “The CPEC won't affect the status quo of Kashmir disputes. The project itself is an economic plan set to connect China and Pakistan and advance Pakistan's economy and improve the lives of its people
http://www.hindustantimes.com/world...yes-to-cpec/story-II1QyvAvp0CiKPsafbAZ5K.html
 
.
Back
Top Bottom