What's new

China's telecommunications infrastructure 'no risk' for West

ChinaToday

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
4,557
Reaction score
-2
Country
China
Location
United Kingdom
WESTERN concerns over Chinese involvement in telecommunications infrastructure are unwarranted, says the head of the Asian arm of British telecoms giant BT Group.

Kevin Taylor, managing director of BT Asia-Pacific, says in Hong Kong that the group's partnership with Chinese telecoms company Huawei in Europe has been a positive -- and safe -- experience.

The Gillard government has banned Huawei from tendering for contracts associated with the $36 billion National Broadband Network due to concerns about cyber security.

Taylor says the security of BT's European ventures with Huawei reinforce why market forces rather than security concerns should be the driving force in the industry.

"There's a huge amount of protectionism against Chinese companies," Taylor says.

"But we took (Huawei) into the UK and we've passed all the security provisions. We know exactly what's in that network, and we've got rigid quality assurance to ensure there's no security risks."

Huawei is a strategic partner in developing BT's broadband network in Britain
.

Taylor, who has lived in Asia for 18 years, says Australia should avoid the protectionism towards China that has surfaced in the US.

"If Australia really wants to be an integrated player in Asia, it can't be anti-Chinese," he says.

Taylor also raises questions about the structure of the NBN, flagging concerns about how the cost of the project will translate into pricing.

He warns it is difficult to see how the $36 billion project could ultimately compete on price with other countries.

"It's important that the NBN becomes competitive and that the costs are consistent with other countries for efficiency purposes," he says.

"Whether that calculation works out or not I don't know, but I hope it does."

The government-run structure being pursued in Australia contrasts with that in Britain, where government regulation forced BT in 2006 to ring-fence many of its infrastructure assets in an independent subsidiary.

That subsidiary, called Openreach, sells access to all service providers -- including BT -- at the same price.

That approach is in contrast with the Australian government's establishment of NBN Co as a wholesale monopoly supplier of fixed-line broadband services.

Telstra, Australia's largest telecoms company, is being paid $9bn by NBN Co to decommission its copper network and transfer its customers, and its fixed-line monopoly, to the new network.

The regulatory change hit BT hard at the time, but the change came at a negligible cost to taxpayers and created a fiercely competitive market.

There are now more than 2000 competitors in Britain's broadband market, Taylor says.

"It has meant the UK is the most competitive telecoms market in the world and broadband costs are the cheapest in the world. It has been a big success."

BT's cheapest broadband package in Britain costs pound stg. 6.99 ($11) a month, while a more comprehensive package retails for about pound stg. 25.

In contrast, the big outlay for the NBN means low pricing could be difficult to achieve.

"I don't know if the (NBN) model will get to a cost level such as you get in the UK," he says.

Taylor says the British approach could also have worked in Australia.

But instead, Telstra should be "very happy" with the outcome it negotiated with the government.

"Telstra has done very well out of it. They've got a significant amount of money."

Despite his reservations on the model, Taylor says the NBN would put BT in a good position to pursue its business model in Australia.

BT does not intend to enter Australia's retail market and is instead focusing on providing value-added telecoms services to business.

"Telstra has got a huge amount of the market -- it has got all the market really -- and what the NBN will do is give us a level playing field with the Telstras and Optuses to provide value-added services to business enterprises in Australia," Taylor says. "That will be fantastic for us."

BT is focused heavily on adding value on top of providing basic telephone services. It owns and operates the Radianz network, which carries about 40 per cent of the world's financial transactions, and it has executed a major contract to overhaul communications in Britain's National Health Service.

In Australia, the group has won a contract at the under-construction Fiona Stanley hospital in Perth, its first foray into the local health sector.

Taylor says the group's 200 employees in Australia -- based in Perth, Melbourne and Sydney -- are particularly interested in building exposure to the booming resources industry.

"We're very excited by the opportunities in Western Australia. The oil and gas sector is something we really want to push at, and when you look at (Rio Tinto's automated) Mine of the Future and things like that, there's so much innovation in Western Australia that we'd love to get involved in."

BT, which is active in 170 countries, doesn't break down its earnings geographically, but Taylor says the Asia-Pacific division is recording double-digit growth and is expected to continue doing so.

The group has pushed into China despite a regulatory regime that is "probably one of the worst in the world", and is also active in India.

"India is very, very important -- it just needs more stability politically," he says. BT is weighing its options there. "We are invested in India but the environment needs to be right."

He is bullish on Asia generally and China specifically.

His experiences with China and Chinese telecoms technology have left in him in no doubt that its economy could deliver the technical innovation many commentators say it needs to keep growing beyond its infrastructure-driven boom.

"I think China is already one of the most innovative economies in the world," he says.

"I think it will be the technology innovator of this century.

"It took decades and decades and decades for China to get its first mobile, to get full telephony, and now it has got companies like Huawei offering some of the most advanced technology in the world. It's just amazing.

"I really see this going into other areas. I really think they're going to be an amazing innovator
."


Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
 
.
We all know who's the bogey man behind all these protectionism is. In a way it's good for our companies. They'll just have to work harder for improvements and become indispensable.
 
.
The worlds worst govt sponsored cyber attackers, hackers and stealers of technology want us to think them having control over communication in foreign land poses no risk. :rofl:
 
.
I will clarify my statement since Zakii didn't understand.

Huawei is suspected of embedding spying code in the telecommunication backbone equipment it sells overseas. This is why Huawei and other Chinese telecom equipment is banned in the US, India and Australia. Accordingly, only those who disregard national security would use Huawei's telecom equipment.

U.S. Blocks China Telecom Bid to Build Wireless Network Over Spying Concerns - The Daily Beast

China Bid Blocked Over Spy Worry
Oct 11, 2011 1:30 AM EDT
Citing national-security concerns, the Commerce Department rebuffed Chinese telecom giant Huawei’s application to build a wireless network for America's first responders, Eli Lake reports exclusively.

Worried about potential spying, the U.S. government has blocked a bid from China’s telecommunications giant Huawei to help build a new national wireless network for first responders such as police, firefighters, and ambulances.

Huawei “will not be taking part in the building of America’s interoperable wireless emergency network for first responders due to U.S. government national-security concerns,” Commerce Department spokesman Kevin Griffis told The Daily Beast.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/business/global/01delhi.html

India Tells Mobile Firms to Delay Deals for Chinese Telecom Equipment
By HEATHER TIMMONS
Published: April 30, 2010

NEW DELHI — Worried about reports of Chinese hackers and spying, the Indian government has effectively barred local mobile phone operators from making deals with Chinese telecommunications manufacturers, according to the head of India’s main cellular industry trade group.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/703733/Australias-bid-ban-on-Huawei-unjust.aspx

Australia's bid ban on Huawei "unjust"

Ren Zhengfei, Huawei's chief executive, was found to have served in China's People's Liberation Army, leading to Australian government's fear about the network security. Photo: Oriental Morning Post

A spokesman with China's commerce ministry said on April 6 that it was "unjust" for the Australian government to ban Chinese telecom equipment company Huawei from bidding on the National Broadband Network (NBN), a local broadband network contracts.
 
.
I will clarify my statement since Zakii didn't understand.

Huawei is suspected of embedding spying code in the telecommunication backbone equipment it sells overseas. This is why Huawei and other Chinese telecom equipment is banned in the US, India and Australia. Accordingly, only those who disregard national security would use Huawei's telecom equipment.

U.S. Blocks China Telecom Bid to Build Wireless Network Over Spying Concerns - The Daily Beast



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/business/global/01delhi.html



http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/703733/Australias-bid-ban-on-Huawei-unjust.aspx


You always have negative atitude. hope you good in real life.

I will clarify my statement since Zakii didn't understand.

Huawei is suspected of embedding spying code in the telecommunication backbone equipment it sells overseas. This is why Huawei and other Chinese telecom equipment is banned in the US, India and Australia. Accordingly, only those who disregard national security would use Huawei's telecom equipment.

U.S. Blocks China Telecom Bid to Build Wireless Network Over Spying Concerns - The Daily Beast



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/business/global/01delhi.html



http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/703733/Australias-bid-ban-on-Huawei-unjust.aspx


You always have negative atitude. hope you good in real life.
 
.
You always have negative atitude. hope you good in real life.
Is it true that the Chinese government forced ALL Chinese communication companies, international and domestic, to turn over all encryption code keys to the government under threats of 'corruption investigation'?
 
.
Is it true that the Chinese government forced ALL Chinese communication companies, international and domestic, to turn over all encryption code keys to the government under threats of 'corruption investigation'?
That should be for China only.
 
. .
The worlds worst govt sponsored cyber attackers, hackers and stealers of technology want us to think them having control over communication in foreign land poses no risk. :rofl:
Europeans tend to be naive about the security threats of Chinese government and telecom equipment vendors due to their inexperience with China in general.

I do hope Pakistan doesn't use Chinese telecom equipment; if Pakistan does, then the Chinese intelligence would be intercepting ISI and high-ranking governmental communications 24/7.

A word of advice to BT.

Even if the Chinese telecom backbone equipment doesn't appear to be sending out intercepted messages initially and the "code review" doesn't show signs of any spying code, the Chinese can install the spying code remotely AFTER the equipment is in place and is operational. And Chinese would kill to have an access to a network backbone equipment and will do everything to gain access.

This is why Chinese telecom equipment can never be trusted.
 
.
Is Korea's nonexistent telecom equipment company going to compete with Huawei now? :lol:
 
. .
Other than a kid working in the US at McDonald that makes more money than your average families.


Jay, you're outclassed here by Korean when it comes to Chinese Telecommunication. He's a real expert in trying to put a dent in China's market shares.
 
. .
Is Korea's nonexistent telecom equipment company going to compete with Huawei now?
Samsung is cleared to sell telecom infrastructure equipment in the US. Samsung's advantage is that it can sell in places where Huawei is banned.

Samsung beats Ericsson in Asian LTE - Rethink Wireless

Samsung beats Ericsson in Asian LTE
Korean firm will be lead vendor for 4G macro base stations in its home region, may be springboard for future success, says research
By CAROLINE GABRIEL

Published: 28 November, 2011

In mobile infrastructure, Ericsson is always looking over its shoulder at Huawei, but not really at Samsung, whose networks business has had none of the impact of its handsets. But the Korean vendor could have seized the number one position in LTE base stations in Asia-Pacific this year, according to estimates from NPD In-Stat, which would be a valuable springboard in the region which is likely to be the largest 4G market for much of the decade.

The King of LTE base station in Asia Pacific region is Samsung and not Ericsson. And Samsung is cleared to sell LTE equipment in the US, but not Huawei.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom