China's navy no longer so inferior to Japan's, experts say

[xunzi]

xunzi, you always weight the power in paper only.

Beside the British which used submarine in modern naval warfare like the Falkland Island war, none of the countries in that list have used it in real battle except in paper. LOL But you see, my friend. We don't need to go into battle to know how potent a 21st century submarine is. You can look at the armament, type of engine it is run, and the scale to know how deadly it is.

The Deadliest Submarines in the World
The Deadliest Submarines in the World - TheRichest

Let be remind that we are at #5 which is not even our best submarine. The Type 096 in development will be a Virginia Class and deploy 2020. By 2020, everything will change. Believe us when we said that.

 

[Globenim]

The future Japanese navy should worry about the volleys of kinetic energy blown into their faces at hypersonic speed by Chinese LAND forces located somewhere deep in the countryside far away from the ocean, before the imperialists can even leave port. There is too much unrealistic and overpatriotric armchair dreaming in this topic.

 

[Aepsilons]

A las, a first strike initiative would be contradictory to claims of a 'Peaceful Rise'.

 

[Aepsilons]

never said they, would, you said it contradicts peaceful rise, well, what does it matter if nukes are launched.

It's not that difficult to understand is it, just one sentence.

Did you read the post from globenim? threatening a first strike on the Japanese Navy? Or perhaps your eye failed to read that part. Such hostile words is the antithesis of a 'Peaceful Rise' of China.

 

[Sasquatch]

Japan has a better ASW capability which will cause major headaches for PLAN, their navy is also better experienced. China has only now really focused on building our ASW capability (Y-8, Z-9, Type 056). China is building future anti submarine platforms such as the Type 057 and the naval version of the Z-20 just like the seahawk.

 

[Sasquatch]

Stick the topic please about Japan and China respective navies not ADIZ , nukes, or non english posts.

 

[F-22Raptor]

Sure we can do alot, the ADIZ allows us to formalize and undermine American of our reciprocity: when we sent Intel ship to RIMPAC or close to Hawaii, there is nothing US can do about it, we just enjoy such reciprocity.

Another example: When George bush think that nohting China can do about it by proclaim his space policy in 2006:



in 2007 China laughed an ASAT to consolidate George Bush junor's statement and tell that any hostile to China's Interest in space will also have to comply to American President's space policy as well .

Americans always think themself to be exceptional and believe the nothing other nations can do to America for what so ever they did ....but we Chinese like to undermine them that American's execptionalism is just a wet dream, unscientific and unlawfull.

Space policy of the George W. Bush administration - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The difference being our naval leadership acted professionally and said your intel ship was acting lawfully, while China on the other hand likes to whine and moan about our intel ships acting in a similar capacity off Chinese coasts. It just shines a light on Chinas double standards and hypocrisy.

My apologies, didn't see your post above.

 

[BoQ77]

there's over 100 Aegis combat system installed on warships of Japan, SK, Turkey, Spain, Australia, US, Norway ...
as they act as an unique system ...
don't understand why China want to call themselves Type 052D as Chinese Aegis destroyer?
Does China warship linked to each others ?

----------

I ranked them as direct fighters during WW2 by subs.