What's new

China’s Economy Is Heading Toward Stagnation, Not Collapse

obj 705A

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 26, 2019
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
0
Country
Iraq
Location
Iraq

China’s Economy Is Heading Toward Stagnation, Not Collapse​


Beijing will soon break another record, when the 2008 Summer Games host becomes the first city ever to hold the Winter Games as well. The lack of natural snow at this month’s Winter Olympics will present no hurdle for China’s Communist Party, which will literally move mountains to get the job done. But a much harder task than weather control confronts President Xi Jinping: delivering on his pledge for a fairer distribution of China’s wealth while maintaining stable growth.

The reality is far more complex, and the stakes are growing ever higher. China’s success over the past 40 years—rising to become the world’s second largest economy, and top trading partner of multiple nations—should not be belittled. But nor can it be taken for granted that Beijing will continue delivering the stellar economic performance its citizens now expect, and the growth that foreign investors and governments have come to reply on.

Xi looks to national security and ideology, not growth and pragmatism, to realize his “China dream” of national rejuvenation. And in a watershed moment last year, he added the goal of “common prosperity,” updating a Maoist concept from the 1950s to put reduction of inequalities, expansion of the middle class, and encouragement of entrepreneurship among smaller companies at the heart of China’s economic policies.

While fighting income and wealth inequality is a noble task, the way Xi has gone about it undermines two of the most important dynamos of China’s development model over the past 40 years: private enterprise and the authorities’ trial and error approach to policy change.

Now a proud centenarian, the Communist Party he leads still appears to enjoy strong public support as it strives to deliver a better life for ordinary Chinese. But as Beijing moves further along the road to socialism and eventually, in theory, to communism under the deeply ideological slogan of “common prosperity,” it could well begin to squander the tremendous economic gains it has made during the past 40 years with a more pragmatic, experimental, and open approach to development. Economic stagnation could well threaten the Communist Party’s survival, but it has managed to pull from the brink of collapse before.

Full article:
__________________________________
LOL even the west gave up on the "China collapse theory" now they changed the goal post to "stagnation".
 
.
LOL even the west gave up on the "China collapse theory" now they changed the goal post to "stagnation".
there's still plenty out there in the collapse camp. after 25 years of being wrong, how they still manage to keep on message is pretty amazing lol.
 
. .
So now after 20 years of China Collapse propaganda, thry have to change to China Stagnation. Will they keep on propagating China Stagnation BS for the next 20 year?
 
.
大谎言.jpg
 
.
The west fear rise of China and they relegate to second citizen. Lol.

Chinese are still a developing nation

they are far far away from matching GDP per capita of developed Western nations

as a matter of fact I dont think they will ever reach that standard of living
 
.
Chinese are still a developing nation

they are far far away from matching GDP per capita of developed Western nations

as a matter of fact I dont think they will ever reach that standard of living
As a matter of fact if we reach just half of that our total national wealth will be more than EU and U.S. combined. And you sir, shall be put on suicide watch then?:azn:
 
.
As a matter of fact if we reach just half of that our total national wealth will be more than EU and U.S. combined. And you sir, shall be put on suicide watch then?:azn:

Communist GDP of USSR was also massive and in 1 year out all went down the drain in 1991

Free and open markets with population stability are more safe then communist regimes

Communist regimes go up fast and come back down quickly

its a self destructing form of governance

which is why small nations like UK which are united can achieve way above their weight
 
.
Colonial empires:
1950 China is doomed to fail
1951 China is doomed to fail
1952 China is doomed to fail
1953 China is doomed to fail
1954 China is doomed to fail
....
1988 China is on the verge of collapse too
1989 China is on the verge of collapse too
1990 China is on the verge of collapse too
1991 China is on the verge of collapse too
1992 China is on the verge of collapse too
....
2018 China is on the verge of collapse
2019 China is on the verge of collapse
2020 China is on the verge of collapse
2021 China is on the verge of collapse
2022 Okay can we at least agree China is on the verge of stagnation?
 
Last edited:
.
I agree with him. Do you think China's GDP can still grow at 22% this year?That would be an increase of $4 trillion a year.I think China's GDP will still only grow by $3 trillion in 2022, not $4 trillion. :meeting:
 
.
I agree with him. Do you think China's GDP can still grow at 22% this year?That would be an increase of $4 trillion a year.I think China's GDP will still only grow by $3 trillion in 2022, not $4 trillion. :meeting:
Stagnation means little growth.
 
. .
Communist GDP of USSR was also massive and in 1 year out all went down the drain in 1991

Free and open markets with population stability are more safe then communist regimes

Communist regimes go up fast and come back down quickly

its a self destructing form of governance

which is why small nations like UK which are united can achieve way above their weight

Communist systems are based around single point of failure - namely the leadership. As long as the leadership is headed in the right direction growth will be strong but all it takes is 1 bad apple at the head to bring it down in an instant.

Small nations like UK punch above their weight due to immoral and underhanded practices which they are masters of by practicing them for hundreds of years.
 
.
Stagnation means little growth.
You need to adopt flexible standards. If China's GDP had not stagnated. You should use the first derivative, and if the first derivative doesn't show stagnation, use the second derivative. :azn:
 
.
You need to adopt flexible standards. If China's GDP had not stagnated. You should use the first derivative, and if the first derivative doesn't show stagnation, use the second derivative. :azn:
hehe, you are just being sarcastic. :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom