China trade surplus with US hits record high in June

[qwerrty]

Go easy. Too much beating up these days.

You probably missed the phase in the bios

"Formerly known as Huawei Technology Co." Which is the same name as the "Phone Guy"

nope. the other huawei is called huawei technologies co, not ..logy

 

[jhungary]

nope. the other huawei is called huawei technologies co, not ..logy

Dude, you looks like you are twelfth and trying to buy stock for the first time.

They could have called it Huawei Techno, that is still similar to between the stock and the company, it does not matter how you call your company, the important thing is that you name your Public company "Huawei". I don't know how "Lax" the Chinese Company Law can be, but if I name my company Apple Primary product or Samsung Toy Co, I will probably get sue in like 5 second.

So, the LOL is not on me, because there are only 2 situations you can develop here.

1.) Both company have relations to each other, just because Huawei the phone guy is private that does not mean Huawei Culture is not one of the parental company or have any association with it, like Sony is a public company, but Sony Interactive Entertainment (Which make PS4 and its game) is a privately own limited company subsidiaries of Sony, while Sony investor have no control on SIE, that doesn't mean the sale of PlayStation 4 does not impact on Sony Stock at all. So if this is the case, then the LOL is on you.

2.) Both company have no relationship at all, then the LOL is on Chinese government or either the Huawei company, with its lax corporate law and corporate practices. I don't think there are anywhere in the world can have such a latent piracy on a company over another and have the same name where one of them is listed publicly for a long period of time, and the other is a multinational coagulate company which have reach literally all over the world, you would have thought if both name the same, one have to go because either it is a intentional misled by the Public company or the failure of Chinese government to enforce its company law, which allow this to last for 8 years. I mean, if this is the case, I would change my factory name in china to Alibaba and go public in Shenzhen in a jiffy LOL

Now, unless you had studied the prospectus thoroughly, which I am not going to do and not going to start now as I have no interest on Chinese Stock Market, and if you want, you can come back with proof to suggest it was the either case, for me, I couldn't care less whether or not the Huawei listed is the Huawei we are talking about.

 

[Viet]

You are clueless. MUSTANG is a very affordable sports car but mainly cater to white Americans. The quality is still subpar after 60 years of "refinement"
Japanese , Korean and German cars offer a lot more quality and value

Lol at your clue. America is a white country. If mustang isn’t for the whites, for who else? Asian immigrant gangs from Vietnam and China?

Nope it's not our problem because Chinese consumer can have alternative but I can't say the same about US companies in China do you expect them to get Vietnamese as customer within China?
US leading technology is not accessible to China anyway and after what had happen to ZTE, China will never want to depend on any of US's high tech anymore, we rather pour money on research to acquire our own independent high tech industries as President Xi focus on China 2025. When come to medium tech such automobiles and Aviation, Japan, Germany and EU will be glad to fill the vacuum left by US under the trade war.

The countries you mentioned, Germany and Japan, are great, however they can’t compensate the losss if you can no longer tap the innovation strength of US economy.

Almost all recent technology in Internet comes America. Or take the software industry, all are dominated by the US firms in Silicon Valley or surroundings. Germany has only one company (SAP). Then comes nothing.

Of course not everything is great. The US car industry and everything in manufacturing are weak. Quality of buildings and housings suck too. Low quality. While houses in Germany are built for at least 100 years, many of those in America hardly survive 30 years.

 

[Kai Liu]

that a fukn long *** post doesn't make you less clueless. it only make me wanna poop. me gotta go poop now. please carry on

The phone company is 华为，the one he is talking about @jhungary is 骅威... Two completely different companies with no relation whatsoever...
骅威文化：
https://baike.baidu.com/item/骅威文化股份有限公司/20057299
http://www.huawei-stock.com/

Here is the 骅威科技 which makes toys:
http://huawei.b.ctoy.com.cn/
https://baike.baidu.com/link?url=aP...jXM7Mn1qxUEGy7HzXENvBvmzUrt2BtWqD5qN7ZDOwRCPK

Corporations in different field could adopt same name. Like we have ZTE whose Chinese name is 中兴通讯，and an auto company 中兴汽车. Both are "中兴“.

 

[hoangsa74]

Quality of buildings and housings suck too. Low quality. While houses in Germany are built for at least 100 years, many of those in America hardly survive 30 years.[/QUOTE]
don't talk about stuff in America that you don't even have a clue about, especially housing. houses in the u.s last forever, not 30 years. our house in the hot state of California is already over 60 years old and it looks like it will make it to 600 years if it needs to. Houses in the old east states are even at least 100 years old.

You need to focus on bragging about your vinfast, a car that has not even run on the street for at least 10 years yet.LOL

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

The countries you mentioned, Germany and Japan, are great, however they can’t compensate the losss if you can no longer tap the innovation strength of US economy.

Almost all recent technology in Internet comes America. Or take the software industry, all are dominated by the US firms in Silicon Valley or surroundings. Germany has only one company (SAP). Then comes nothing.

Of course not everything is great. The US car industry and everything in manufacturing are weak. Quality of buildings and housings suck too. Low quality. While houses in Germany are built for at least 100 years, many of those in America hardly survive 30 years.

As I said before China can't tap US innovation since it's not accessible for China, we had already learn what we could for these 40 years from western nation, now it's time for China to walk on it own innovation path such as China 2025 which made American pee on their pants because they know that China will not only catch up but they will lost their leadership on the world.

As for internet, China has a total control of a realm of over 700 millions Chinese users with a fire wall, we already enjoy and monopolize our internet world.

 

[faithfulguy]

The phone company is 华为，the one he is talking about @jhungary is 骅威... Two completely different companies with no relation whatsoever...
骅威文化：
https://baike.baidu.com/item/骅威文化股份有限公司/20057299
http://www.huawei-stock.com/

Here is the 骅威科技 which makes toys:
http://huawei.b.ctoy.com.cn/
https://baike.baidu.com/link?url=aP...jXM7Mn1qxUEGy7HzXENvBvmzUrt2BtWqD5qN7ZDOwRCPK

Corporations in different field could adopt same name. Like we have ZTE whose Chinese name is 中兴通讯，and an auto company 中兴汽车. Both are "中兴“.

So it’s similar to “general motor” vs “general electric”? Two name in different industries. Gary, it’s ok.

As I said before China can't tap US innovation since it's not accessible for China, we had already learn what we could for these 40 years from western nation, now it's time for China to walk on it own innovation path such as China 2025 which made American pee on their pants because they know that China will not only catch up but they will lost their leadership on the world.

As for internet, China has a total control of a realm of over 700 millions Chinese users with a fire wall, we already enjoy and monopolize our internet world.

China only has 700 mil internet users, that is not a lot for China.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

China only has 700 mil internet users, that is not a lot for China.

how many internet users around the world excluding China?

 

[faithfulguy]

how many internet users around the world excluding China?

But China has over 1.3 bil. I thought China has at least 80% internet penetration.

 

[TaiShang]

that a fukn long *** post doesn't make you less clueless. it only make me wanna poop. me gotta go poop now. please carry on

Enough with the beating!

Don't you know these few are professional posters and, unlike you and me, have all the required time to out-word and beat you?

 

[Kai Liu]

Look, azz lickers, this is your image in the eyes of your masters...
BTW, I have nothing much against white skin animals, but their smell is really annoying, using too much perfume to cover their stinking body....

 

[TaiShang]

Investors look across Atlantic for better prospects

By Ren Xiaojin | China Daily | Updated: 2018-07-18

Employees work on the assembly of the Gorenje appliance factory in Velenje, Slovenia, which sold most of its stake to a Chinese home appliance maker. [Photo/Agencies]

Trade frictions between China and the United States will continue to drive Chinese capital to Europe and such a trend is unlikely to change in the second half of 2018, said experts.

"Under US President Donald Trump's protectionist policy, Chinese investors are losing their confidence in the North America market," said Zhang Yuyan, director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

The comment came after global law firm Baker McKenzie and research provider Rhodium Group reported that the value of Chinese companies' newly announced merger and acquisition activities in Europe in the first half of 2018 reached $22 billion, nine times greater than the amount in North America, which was $2.5 billion.

During the same period, the value of completed Chinese outbound direct investment reached $12 billion, six times the amount in North America, which was $2 billion.

Chinese ODI in North America hit a nine-year low in the first half of the year, with a 92 percent yearly decline to $2 billion. "Deal activity is depressed in both the US and Canada," the report said.

According to data released on Tuesday by the Ministry of Commerce, Chinese investors made $57.1 billion of non-financial direct investment in 3,617 overseas companies in 151 countries and regions in the first six months of 2018, up 18.7 percent.

Investment in countries and regions involved in the Belt and Road Initiative increased 12 percent, reaching $7.4 billion.

"The cost of investing in the US has been increasing. Together with the escalating trade tensions and the noise the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States has been making, Chinese investors are losing confidence in the US," Zhang said.

"Compared to the US, Europe has a relatively more welcoming market and better investment environment, although they also have some friction with China," Zhang added.

Zhang said if the US can act "rationally" in the future, the two parties could put bilateral investment relations onto the right track, but "according to what is happening right now, such a change is unlikely to take place in the next six months of 2018," he said.

 

[Globenim]

even big company such as Huawei is selling at RMB6 (or $1 USD) per share at the moment. I mean, even Nokia is still trading for 6 USD a share...…

since when huawei is publicly traded? i must be living under a rock. lol. you don't know what you're talking about, like always.

The phone company is 华为，the one he is talking about @jhungary is 骅威... Two completely different companies with no relation whatsoever...
骅威文化：
https://baike.baidu.com/item/骅威文化股份有限公司/20057299
http://www.huawei-stock.com/

Here is the 骅威科技 which makes toys:
http://huawei.b.ctoy.com.cn/
https://baike.baidu.com/link?url=aP...jXM7Mn1qxUEGy7HzXENvBvmzUrt2BtWqD5qN7ZDOwRCPK

Corporations in different field could adopt same name. Like we have ZTE whose Chinese name is 中兴通讯，and an auto company 中兴汽车. Both are "中兴“.

The rest of the claim is actually just as hillarious.

The mere assumption that you can infer anything meaningful about the wellbeing of a company from comparing a single quote of its own stock against a completely unrelated stock and suggesting the (compared to the other quote) lower share price is per se undesirable, is just oozing of ignorance. What if my company has 1 billion outstanding shares at $1 and the other 1 million at $6? Is the other "still" better off? Trick question. Everyone knows it's classic layman naivety to compare even blank market cap, even when it's respecting the number of outstanding shares. What if my company issues two stock options with and without dividend payments and one stands at $6 and the other at $1. Is my company in more trouble or better off than... well, itself? It's just getting worse. A low share price is actually generally prefered. That's a common reason for stock splits, when the price of a single share gets too high and impeeds trading.

Even his absurdly false dichotomy, he made up after he got called out for confusing a stock symbol for the name of an unlisted company (and quickly editing his old posts to cover it up with silly excuses), illustrates his utter ignorance about basic corporate and trade mark laws, that hardly differ from U.S. and European laws on this particular subject, producing many cases like Apple Inc and Apple Corps or the million of variants of literally "ABC" companies from L's to C's operating next to each other with little or no impunity. As well as it illustrates an utter lack of real world experience.

And yes this is very relevant on-topic information. When people try to perpetuate clueless nonsense about important entities in Chinas economy in a thread about Chinas trade surpluss, it got to be called out.

 

[oprih]

Damn, @jhungary is so dumb.

 

[AndrewJin]

Damn, @jhungary is so dumb.

<82。。。。