What's new

China Signs Secret Deal for Naval Outpost in Cambodia, WSJ Says

@925boy, hey, you knew those guys. They bad mouth everywhere without basic logic. Even when you put the proof on the table, they will selectively ignore.

It's just waste of time on those without rational mindset.

When you talk with them about geopolitics and power, they brag their 500 ton warship as if it's comparable with USS Ticonderoga or Chinese Type 055 destroyer. Just ignore them or report those troll.
In your mind it is trolling. For me it’s not.

Why big ships if small ships are sufficient?

Look Russia, she used frigates to fire Kalibr at targets in Syria. Why can’t we do the same? We have the same class of frigates, the same type of Kalibr.


1031482106.jpg
 
.
In your mind it is trolling. For me it’s not.

Why big ships if small ships are sufficient?

Look Russia, she used frigates to fire Kalibr at targets in Syria. Why can’t we do the same? We have the same class of frigates, the same type of Kalibr.


1031482106.jpg

Land based, and it cannot survive against China's electronic warfare.

BTW, now the Type 055 and Type 052D is going to equip with the hypersonic anti-ship missile with a range of over 1000 km. That's the real killer anti-ship missile.
 
.
In your mind it is trolling. For me it’s not.

Why big ships if small ships are sufficient?

Look Russia, she used frigates to fire Kalibr at targets in Syria. Why can’t we do the same? We have the same class of frigates, the same type of Kalibr.


1031482106.jpg
Tell that to the Yankees too, hopefully every naval power on this world start to understand your genius idea of "Small is sufficient".
 
.
Land based, and it cannot survive against China's electronic warfare.

BTW, now the Type 055 and Type 052D is going to equip with the hypersonic anti-ship missile with a range of over 1000 km. That's the real killer anti-ship missile.
Can not survive?? Show it in real battle.

Barking dog seldom bite :cool:
 
.
Tell that to the Yankees too, hopefully every naval power on this world start to understand your genius idea of "Small is sufficient".
For us it is sufficient and efficient when building 10x 500 ton warships instead of 1x 5,000 ton ship. Is that difficult for you to understand?

Ok I almost forgot you chinese always think BIG!
 
.
Yeah, but we know CN so well, that why we can defeat CN everytime u try to invade VN. Just like we know PLA generals r idiot and can not avoid our ambush when daddy US stop sending Intel in 1979 war :cool:

And poor PLA soldiers sufferred due to incompetent PLA gens :pop:
22-1337-15489064931611167365655-crop-1548906497419449024878.jpg

people in glass house shouldn't throw rock:

tapatalk_1563976764316.jpeg

the mighty vietnamese marine corp. [emoji23]
 
. .
Almost impossible to jamm Yakhont, unless you can steal the technology from Russia. Ok I give you a 1:100 chance.
You need to study the history of Chinese reserve engineering and the transfer of technology we got from the Russians and Ukrainians. The seekers the missile uses is easily jammed by Chinese systems. We know exactly how it functions.
 
.
You need to study the history of Chinese reserve engineering and the transfer of technology we got from the Russians and Ukrainians. The seekers the missile uses is easily jammed by Chinese systems. We know exactly how it functions.
But no Cnese ever experience how to jam and how to anti -jamming missile in the real war.

U just blindly copy from soviet and hope it work but u never know that the missle also can be guided by the jet, the ships around the target.

Btw, do u know that CN also instal the jamming system in SCS ( east VN sea) and do u know what is happening to that jamming devices ??:cool:
 
Last edited:
.
But no Cnese ever experience how to jam and how to anti -jamming missile in the real war.

U just blindly copy from soviet and hope it work but u never know that the missle also can be guided by the jet, the ships around the target.

Btw, do u know that CN also instal the jamming system in SCS ( east VN sea) and do u know what is happening to that jamming devices ??:cool:
I can't stop you from believing you can win a naval battle against China. But this is reality and you just gotta admit and face it.
 
.
You need to study the history of Chinese reserve engineering and the transfer of technology we got from the Russians and Ukrainians. The seekers the missile uses is easily jammed by Chinese systems. We know exactly how it functions.
Yakhont is one of core components of Russia territorial defense. You mean the Russians will sell their fate for some cheap Yuan?

But no Cnese ever experience how to jam and how to anti -jamming missile in the real war.

U just blindly copy from soviet and hope it work but u never know that the missle also can be guided by the jet, the ships around the target.

Btw, do u know that CN also instal the jamming system in SCS ( east VN sea) and do u know what is happening to that jamming devices ??:cool:
Chinese jamming devices in the Sc sea? That’s illegal! I expect we destroy or make them useless.
 
.
I can't stop you from believing you can win a naval battle against China. But this is reality and you just gotta admit and face it.
Face what? CN dare not start another war cos daddy US refuse giving help like in 1979. CN Jamming system didnt work well in SCS ( ewst VN sea) and u keep boasting abt CN obsolete jamming device that even worse than 1960s jamming stuff.

What else can I say?? Barking dog seldom bite? :pop:

Chinese jamming devices in the Sc sea? That’s illegal! I expect we destroy or make them useless.
Yep, thats true, CN military jamming devices r in SCS ( east VN sea) now, but is not so "super" like what Cnese trying to boast here cos its just a cheap copy from Soviet's one.

And Cnese also dont know that Soviet jamming one also just a copy from US 's one after we shoot down US jet carrying jamming device and gave the jamming device to Soviet :lol:
 
Last edited:
.
I don’t understand why you are laughing? It’s because of the rifles? the carmo? Or what? Or you mean we are no match to Indo Marines?

@Nilgiri
@Aqsuperman

You have to forgive the Indon expert lol. In his mind, the second strongest army in the world is the Indonesian army and the strongest one happen to be West Papua National Liberation Army. To them, the VPA is simply weaker because we dare to include hip firing exercise into our training curriculum. They have no problems seeing their Kopassus got wasted by Papuan rebels armed with outdated rifles, bows and spears though :)
 
. .
You have to forgive the Indon expert lol. In his mind, the second strongest army in the world is the Indonesian army and the strongest one happen to be West Papua National Liberation Army. To them, the VPA is simply weaker because we dare to include hip firing exercise into our training curriculum. They have no problems seeing their Kopassus got wasted by Papuan rebels armed with outdated rifles, bows and spears though :)
That Poor guy just dont know anything abt VN tactic.

Maybe ID use US tactic- attack enemy from far range, so they prefer firing while aiming while VN prefer Very close range attack-shooting without aim ( of course when the enemies r just 20-30 meters from u, its so stupid to aim before shooting )
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom