What's new

China says it has hypersonic missiles with heat-seeking tech – years before US

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia
China says it has hypersonic missiles with heat-seeking tech – years before US
  • Breakthroughs in the precision and cooling mechanism of infrared sensors are pushing forward the country’s development of hypersonic weapons, researchers say
  • Warfare could be transformed by hypersonic missiles able to search for, identify and lock on to targets based on heat signature
Stephen Chen
Stephen Chen
in Beijing
Published: 9:59pm, 31 Dec, 2021
1641055882802.png


Chinese scientists say they have developed next-generation hypersonic weapons with technical breakthroughs in infrared homing technology – which the US military may not have until 2025.

Heat-seeking capability allows Chinese hypersonic missiles to home in on almost any target – including stealth aircraft, aircraft carriers and moving vehicles on the street – with unprecedented accuracy and speed, according to the researchers.

The first generation of hypersonic weapons were designed to penetrate missile defence systems and hit fixed targets on the ground at five times the speed of sound or faster. Although China and Russia had deployed some hypersonic missiles, a popular opinion elsewhere was that these weapons had little practical value unless a country wanted to start a nuclear war.

But conventional warfare could be transformed by a hypersonic missile being able to search for, identify and lock on to a target based on its heat signature when flying at low altitudes where the air is thicker, said the Chinese researchers, from the hypersonic infrared homing programme at the National University of Defence Technology.

Chinese hypersonic weapons test ‘has all of our attention’, US General Mark Milley says

According to the US Air Force, about 90 per cent of all the aircraft it has lost since the 1980s were shot down with heat-seeking missiles, and stealth fighters such as the F-22 could also be targets because their coating materials heat up easily in flight. A Chinese military researcher told an academic conference in 2020 that a ground-to-air hypersonic missile could catch up with and destroy an F-22 in a matter of seconds if it fired a missile or dropped a bomb from close range.

Heat sensing at hypersonic speed is not easy, but China has made “a series of core technology breakthroughs that were proven effective in tests”, lead scientist Professor Yi Shihe wrote in a paper published on December 15 in domestic peer-reviewed journal Air and Space Defence.

The country’s hypersonic infrared missiles had already been used in a number of test flights – work that won Yi’s team a top national award for military science and technology from the People’s Liberation Army, according to an editor’s note that introduced Yi’s work in domestic journal Modern Defence Technology last June.

“Precision guidance with infrared imaging technology is a force multiplier for hypersonic weapons,” Yi said in a paper published in the journal.

“If one party takes the lead in processing mature hypersonic weapons, this party will have the absolute advantage of asymmetric attacks.

“With effective hypersonic precision strike weapons, the critical value of ‘strategic depth’ in traditional warfare will no longer exist. All the critical political, economic and military assets of a country will be at risk.”

At high Mach numbers, the surface of a missile becomes so hot that a target’s heat signal can be overwhelmed by background noise. The infrared window would crack because no glass material could withstand the extreme heat and shock waves.

Scientists from around the world had proposed ways to lower the temperature, such as splashing liquid over the window or planting cooling tubes under the glass. Most of these ideas were ineffective or too complex, according to Yi and his colleagues.
The Chinese scientists put an air-blowing device in front of the infrared window to generate a thin membrane of cold air, reducing the heat on the glass. Some research teams in other countries had tried this approach but failed because the cooling air could trigger strong turbulence that distorted the heat signal, giving a fuzzy, flickering and less accurate location of the target.

Yi’s team solved this problem with a number of breakthroughs. They developed a compact, lightweight device that could generate an extremely cold stream of inert gas at more than three times the speed of sound to reduce signal distortion.
They managed to squeeze 40 microvortex generators into the air-cooling device to produce air flows that could break apart the turbulence. They also developed a new mathematical model that helped them to better predict and eliminate the optical distortion as missiles accelerated and homed in on targets at wide attack angles.

This progress came from a large number of experiments that they conducted in the KD-01 wind tunnel, a world-leading research facility for hypersonic infrared homing technology in Changsha.

The wind tunnel used a unique technology that allowed researchers to observe turbulence over glass with a resolution more than 120 times higher than that of facilities using American technology, according to Yi.

The United States had previously been a world leader in heat sensing, according to the Chinese scientists. In the 1980s and 90s, the US government and military invested an enormous amount of resources in the development of high-speed infrared homing technology that was used to develop missile defence systems such as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system.

However, these heat sensors worked only in thin air at high altitudes. Last February, the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency asked numerous defence contractors, including General Electric and Lockheed Martin, to develop infrared sensors for hypersonic missiles.

According to their contracts, the development and testing of their sensors will take at least four years.
 
.
Its only matter of time when Chinese tech will surpass US + combined global tech in military department.
 
. . .
Its only matter of time when Chinese tech will surpass US + combined global tech in military department.
Not sure.
They mainly rely on copy and paste of west technology. Except about hypersonic weapons, probably stolen from russia.
According to the US Air Force, about 90 per cent of all the aircraft it has lost since the 1980s were shot down with heat-seeking missiles,
Yes, mainly by manpad missiles. This is not a reason to believe there is a viable IR seaker solution for hypersonic missile, in low altitude.
 
.
Not sure.
They mainly rely on copy and paste of west technology. Except about hypersonic weapons, probably stolen from russia.

Yes, mainly by manpad missiles. This is not a reason to believe there is a viable IR seaker solution for hypersonic missile, in low altitude.

It seems that your low iq brain cannot come up with anything better than the pathetic copycat excuse, just the same old copycatting bullshit we all get tired of.

And don't group west as a whole, in any cutting-edge sector of technology development, we all know the only one that is still relatively competitive against China, in tech front, is the US.

As for you, talking about the west as a whole is like claiming I and Bill Gates together owned a $100 billion wealth, you know, it impress nobody, and only make you look even more pathetic and funny than the pathetic frog in well you are.
 
.
The day the first F22 was shot down, US dollar and stock market will slump. US dominance in finance is based on its military hegemony
 
.
US is far behind that they shouldn’t even be a comparison for China. Russia is a better comparison as Russian hypersonic technology is very advanced.
this is painful but factually correct, especially when you say US is "far behind", you mean "far behind in hypersonic missiles", um, compared to China and Russia, yes, but behind generally, not sure US is far behind.
 
.
Not sure.
They mainly rely on copy and paste of west technology. Except about hypersonic weapons, probably stolen from russia.

Yes, mainly by manpad missiles. This is not a reason to believe there is a viable IR seaker solution for hypersonic missile, in low altitude.
What you are talking about is around 30-45 years ago when China was emerging market during 1980s & even back than China had sufficient military technology developed by themselves. Where they were producing self engineered aircraft & tanks to whole range of products.
We are in the year 2022, China has super-ceded in all technology today? Do you think with today's Chinese hypersonic technology they need copy paste obsolete western outdated products based on English media propuganda hype.
 
.
It seems that your low iq brain cannot come up with anything better than the pathetic copycat excuse, just the same old copycatting bullshit we all get tired of.

And don't group west as a whole, in any cutting-edge sector of technology development, we all know the only one that is still relatively competitive against China, in tech front, is the US.

As for you, talking about the west as a whole is like claiming I and Bill Gates together owned a $100 billion wealth, you know, it impress nobody, and only make you look even more pathetic and funny than the pathetic frog in well you are.
Poor answer.
Nothing a little bit technical, just a praise about a supposed China uber alles....
The pathetic one is not the frog.
The day the first F22 was shot down, US dollar and stock market will slump. US dominance in finance is based on its military hegemony
No F22 was ever shooted down my dear.
What you are talking about is around 30-45 years ago when China was emerging market during 1980s & even back than China had sufficient military technology developed by themselves. Where they were producing self engineered aircraft & tanks to whole range of products.
We are in the year 2022, China has super-ceded in all technology today? Do you think with today's Chinese hypersonic technology they need copy paste obsolete western outdated products based on English media propuganda hype.
HQ9 is a copy of russian S300.
C802 a pale copy of harpoon,
JL10 is a copy of an italian trainer
etc... etc....
 
. .
Poor answer.
Nothing a little bit technical, just a praise about a supposed China uber alles....
The pathetic one is not the frog.

No F22 was ever shooted down my dear.

HQ9 is a copy of russian S300.
C802 a pale copy of harpoon,
JL10 is a copy of an italian trainer
etc... etc....
With the exception of USA, China pretty much fielded an indigenous 5th gen fighter before you and are about to launch an aircraft carrier more advanced(EMALS) than yours and there’s more examples. I mean France has to beg the Americans for EMALS tech.

For a country that copies a lot, I didn’t know they could do this… 🤔

btw: the Italian trainer you mentioned is a copy of a Russian trainer lmao
 
.
With the exception of USA, China pretty much fielded an indigenous 5th gen fighter before you and are about to launch an aircraft carrier more advanced(EMALS) than yours and there’s more examples. I mean France has to beg the Americans for EMALS tech.

For a country that copies a lot, I didn’t know they could do this… 🤔

btw: the Italian trainer you mentioned is a copy of a Russian trainer lmao
Two 5th gen fighters to be exact and soon two stealth bombers will join the list, but it's ok, whatever floats his boat.
 
.
With the exception of USA, China pretty much fielded an indigenous 5th gen fighter before you and are about to launch an aircraft carrier more advanced(EMALS) than yours and there’s more examples. I mean France has to beg the Americans for EMALS tech.

For a country that copies a lot, I didn’t know they could do this… 🤔

btw: the Italian trainer you mentioned is a copy of a Russian trainer lmao
What is Neur@n for you? if not a 5th gen bird ?
Sir, I haven't seen the first Chinese EMALS on duty. And I will have to wait a lot to see that I think.

btw : The italian trainer is not a russian copy : it was studied by Aermacchi, Yakovlev and Sokal all together. It was called YAK/AEM130
 
.
What is Neur@n for you? if not a 5th gen bird ?
Sir, I haven't seen the first Chinese EMALS on duty. And I will have to wait a lot to see that I think.

btw : The italian trainer is not a russian copy : it was studied by Aermacchi, Yakovlev and Sokal all together. It was called YAK/AEM130
Funny you mentioned the Neuron, going by your logic, its a copy of the X-47B. Oh and it’s not even a 5th gen fighter in service lmao - please read my post carefully.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom