What's new

China says Doklam situation 'grave', rules out compromise

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
41,319
Reaction score
181
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
'Ball is in India's court': China says Doklam situation 'grave', rules out compromise

PTI | Updated: Jul 4, 2017, 07.56 PM IST

NEW DELHI: China on Tuesday ruled out a compromise in the military standoff with India in the Sikkim section, and put the onus on New Delhi to resolve the "grave" situation.

In unusually blunt remarks, China's ambassador to India Luo Zhaohui said "the ball is in India's court" and it was for the Indian government to decide what options could be on the table to resolve the standoff.

Asked about remarks by official Chinese media and think-tanks that the conflict can lead to a "war" if not handled properly, the ambassador said in an interview to PTI: "There has been talk about this option, that option. It is up to your government policy (whether to exercise military option)."

The Chinese government is very clear that it wants peaceful resolution at current state of the situation for which withdrawal of Indian troops from the area is a "pre-condition", he asserted.

"The first priority is that the Indian troops unconditionally pull back to the Indian side of the boundary. That is the precondition for any meaningful dialogue between China and India," he said.

China and India have been engaged in a standoff in the Doklam area near the Bhutan trijunction for past 19 days after a Chinese army's construction party came to build a road.

Doka La is the Indian name for the region which Bhutan recognises as Doklam, while China claims it as part of its Donglang region. China and Bhutan are engaged in talks over the resolution of the area. Bhutan, however, has no diplomatic ties with China and it is supported militarily and diplomatically by India.

"The situation is grave and made me deeply worried. It is the first time that Indian troops have crossed the mutually recognised boundary and trespassed into China's territory, triggering a close range face off between Chinese and Indian border troops. Now 19 days have passed, but the situation still has not eased," Luo said.

He also asserted that India has no right to interfere with the China-Bhutan boundary talks, nor is it entitled to make territorial claims on behalf of Bhutan.


On the standoff, the ministry of external affairs had said India was "deeply concerned at the recent Chinese actions and has conveyed to the Chinese government that such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India".


"As for the so called 'security concerns' of the Indian side, India has crossed a delimited boundary into other country's territory in the name of security concerns, no matter what kind of activities it conducts there, which will not acceptable to any sovereign state.


"India cannot encroach upon the territory of other countries on the ground of its 'security concerns'. Otherwise, the world would be in chaos," the Chinese envoy added.




He also asserted that "it is critical that India shall withdraw its troops immediately to minimise the negative impact. It serves the interests of the two sides."
 
. . .
Pakistan and china must settle score with common enemy once and for all.
India stands no chance if we somehow start 2 front storm.

Arunacha sikkam shall go to china.
Kashmir and other Muslim majority areas to Pakistan.
We saw both in 2002 and again in 2008 that India doesn't have the ability to start a war with Pakistan let alone with China, India can only fool it's own public through media hype and lies like the so called surgical circus.
Else Indians can only harass players and performers.
 
.
We saw both in 2002 and again in 2008 that India doesn't have the ability to start a war with Pakistan let alone with China, India can only fool it's own public through media hype and lies like the so called surgical circus.
Else Indians can only harass players and performers.

But we must finish it our leadership is not strong enough to take bold steps.
 
.
Pakistan and china must settle score with common enemy once and for all.
India stands no chance if we somehow start 2 front storm.

Arunacha sikkam shall go to china.
Kashmir and other Muslim majority areas to Pakistan.
Sirlanka and nepal should be given their stolen areas.

No wonder with such mentality you are a rogue state which can never progress itself ..
China India trade accounts to above 70 Billion.What is Pakistan's worth to get into war other than being a loan driven economy?:welcome:
The day China attacks India the world will align & most would be with India..
 
. .
No wonder with such mentality you are a rogue state ..
China India trade accounts to above 70 Billion.What is Pakistan's worth to get into war?:welcome:
The day China attacks India the world will align & most would be with India..

No one cares about you live or die , you have to fight your own wars kiddo.
Table talks or Gun fights only 2 ways to resolve , looks like india wants to go with second.
 
.
We saw both in 2002 and again in 2008 that India doesn't have the ability to start a war with Pakistan let alone with China, India can only fool it's own public through media hype and lies like the so called surgical circus.
Else Indians can only harass players and performers.
Operation parakam of 2002 was a gigantic Indian victory, as it forced Pakistan to vastly reduce militant infiltration into Kashmir:
Many specialists believe that the Indian deployments were an exercise in coercive diplomacy -- a giant bluff to persuade General Musharraf to clamp down on Pakistani terrorists and to frighten Washington into taking India's demands seriously. But India's military preparations were so extensive that the Pentagon found it difficult to tell if the Indians were simply posturing or putting themselves in position to attack.

''I think from the beginning this has been a massive exercise in coercive diplomacy,'' said Stephen P. Cohen, an expert on South Asia at the Brookings Institution. ''The Indians used the threat of war to force Pakistan to back down. They have come out ahead -- as long as nobody makes a mistake.''


https://mobile.nytimes.com/2002/01/20/world/kashmir-threat-eases-but-us-still-sees-dangers.html

2008 stand off was a major success to as bomb blasts in Indian cities decreased drastically after that.

So this proves that Pakistan is so weak that we do not even have to go to war to force it to bend its knee before us, a threat of war is enough.
 
. .
No wonder with such mentality you are a rogue state which can never progress itself ..
Big talk from a nation which has border issues with all it's neighbors.
China India trade accounts to above 70 Billion.What is Pakistan's worth to get into war other than being a loan driven economy?:welcome:
The day China attacks India the world will align & most would be with India..
First feed your soldiers and your breadbasket the farmers before counting the millions....do you think China just has India to trade with.
 
.
We saw both in 2002 and again in 2008 that India doesn't have the ability to start a war with Pakistan let alone with China, India can only fool it's own public through media hype and lies like the so called surgical circus.
Else Indians can only harass players and performers.

but their Media will keep bragging how IA is even more Powerful than USA and every other nation combined ..
you know its for just modi 56 inch chest and wet chori daar Pajama's lol
 
.
Pakistan and china must settle score with common enemy once and for all.
India stands no chance if we somehow start 2 front storm.

Arunacha sikkam shall go to china.
Kashmir and other Muslim majority areas to Pakistan.
Sirlanka and nepal should be given their stolen areas.
I will long advocate that. China may hit the chicken neck of India while Pakistan will launch a full attack on Kashmir. This is not more 1999 of Kargil War. China will provide real time surveilance and Beidou II GPS to back PA action. PLAAF will also fully support any campaign. We will split India and make sure she is never a threat.
 
.
No one cares about you live or die , you have to fight your own wars kiddo.
Table talks or Gun fights only 2 ways to resolve , looks like india wants to go with second.
Explains the accountability of reports that your literacy is declining..
You have no money for war..You mortgage motorways to get rid of financial burdens.Let alone war.
Pakistan is nothing but a satellite state whose financial policies are driven by China & diplomatic policies are driven by bunch of noob stars..Pakistan is always on defensive side.

Big talk from a nation which has border issues with all it's neighbors.

First feed your soldiers and your breadbasket the farmers before counting the millions....do you think China just has India to trade with.
Our low fed army had given shelter for your army fed them for six months almost 50 years ago..By those of your speeches you can up your morale though.
China has border issues with most of it's neighbors too.They also are buying jets tanks to show power projection against China..
Pakistan-Too incompetent to be in the discussion
 
.
Operation parakam of 2002 was a gigantic Indian victory, as it forced Pakistan to vastly reduce militant infiltration into Kashmir:


https://mobile.nytimes.com/2002/01/20/world/kashmir-threat-eases-but-us-still-sees-dangers.html

2008 stand off was a major success to as bomb blasts in Indian cities decreased drastically after that.

So this proves that Pakistan is so weak that we do not even have to go to war to force it to bend its knee before us, a threat of war is enough.

Although you don't have a face but none the less still let me rub it into some dust.

spacer15.gif

spacer15.gif

Indian army 'backed out' of Pakistan attack

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KA21Df02.html
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom