What's new

China Hesitates on Bailing Out Sri Lanka, Pakistan as Debt Soars

China Hesitates on Bailing Out Sri Lanka, Pakistan as Debt Soars​

Bloomberg News
Wed, April 13, 2022, 6:24 PM·5 min read
62473ff1682de141e8221bdbb66efdb7

(Bloomberg) -- Over the past few years, the U.S. has accused China of using “debt diplomacy” to make developing nations across the world more dependent on Beijing.

Yet the cases of Sri Lanka and Pakistan -- both friends of China facing dire financial situations as inflation soars -- show that President Xi Jinping’s government is becoming more reluctant to pull out the checkbook. China still hasn’t made good on a pledge to re-issue loans totaling $4 billion that Pakistan repaid in late March, and it hasn’t responded to Sri Lanka’s pleas for $2.5 billion in credit support.

While China has pledged to help both countries, the more cautious approach reflects both a refining of Xi’s signature Belt and Road Initiative as well as a hesitancy to be seen interfering in messy domestic political situations. Pakistan got a new prime minister on Monday after parliament booted out former cricket star Imran Khan, and Sri Lanka’s leader is facing pressure from protesters to step down.

“Beijing has for the past couple of years been rethinking its external lending because their banks realized they were carrying a lot of debt with countries whose prospects of paying back were quite limited,” said Raffaello Pantucci, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University. “This came on top of a tightening economic situation at home which also required a lot of spending, so there was less appetite to just throw money around wantonly.”

China is currently facing its own economic troubles, with lockdowns to contain the country’s worst Covid outbreak since early 2020 shutting down the technology and financial hubs of Shanghai and Shenzhen. Premier Li Keqiang on Monday told local authorities they should “add a sense of urgency” when implementing policies as analysts warn the official growth target of a 5.5% is now in jeopardy.


China has become the world’s largest government creditor over the past decade, with its state-owned policy banks lending more to developing countries than the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank in some recent years. The opacity around the terms and scale of some of that lending has been criticized, especially as the pandemic exacerbates debt problems in poorer countries.

Sri Lanka was downgraded deeper into junk by Fitch Ratings, which said on Wednesday the nation’s decision to suspend payments on its foreign debt has kicked off a sovereign default process. S&P said Sri Lanka’s next interest payments are due on April 18 and the failure to cover them will likely result in default, as would an outright debt restructuring.

Sri Lanka’s top diplomat in Beijing this week said he was “very confident” that China will come through with credit support, including $1 billion for the country to repay existing Chinese loans due in July. In an interview with Bloomberg, Ambassador Palitha Kohona said the process often takes months and he didn’t see any delay.

“Given the current circumstances, there aren’t that many countries that can step out to the pitch and do something,” he said. “China is one of those countries that can do something very quickly.”

Still, China’s role in helping to resolve ongoing crises in South Asia may be limited despite its status as a major creditor. A Shanghai-based scholar who researches China’s overseas lending said new credit lines are harder to approve as authorities emphasize risk management at financial institutions including policy banks. The scholar asked not to be named due to rules for speaking with the media.

Xi highlighted the importance of a more cautious approach at a high-level Belt and Road symposium in November. “It is necessary to implement risk prevention and control systems,” Xi said. He called on participants to make “small but beautiful” projects a priority for foreign cooperation and “avoid dangerous and chaotic places.”

Earlier this month, Jin Liqun, president of the China-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, encouraged Sri Lanka to turn to the IMF for help in a meeting with Kohona.

‘Sinking Ships’

China’s development banks are acting to preserve returns and it “would be difficult for them to easily accede to Sri Lanka’s requests for deferrals,” said Matthew Mingey, a senior analyst at Rhodium Group’s China Macro & Policy team who researches economic diplomacy.

“Credit conditions back in China aren’t making things any easier for them,” he added. “Ultimately, Sri Lanka needs the IMF.”

Sri Lanka said Tuesday it would expedite talks with the IMF after it halted payments on foreign debt to preserve dollars for essential food and fuel imports. Pakistan’s new government also plans to work with the IMF to stabilize the economy, according to Miftah Ismail, a former finance minister and a senior ruling party leader.

China’s ability to assist either country with a balance-of-payments crisis is limited, particularly as Beijing’s financial assistance is almost always tied to specific projects, said Muttukrishna Sarvananthan, principle researcher at the Point Pedro Institute of Development in Sri Lanka. China’s policy of non-interference in internal affairs prevents it from offering the type of advice needed for countries to emerge out of a financial crisis, he added.

“Even the IMF appears to be moving very slowly -- if not abandoning -- the requests of both Pakistan and Sri Lanka for their assistance,” Sarvananthan said. “Which sane bilateral donor country or international financial institution would pour money into sinking ships in both Pakistan and Sri Lanka.”

(Updates with Fitch downgrade in seventh paragraph.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

 
.
SL owes like 10% of its debt to China,meanwhile say 1ndia ,it's 9%,japan 10%, why should China have any onus to bail out srilanka ?by doing so will China gain other than higher debt margin?why don't they ask japan ,India ,IMF to bail out SL ?
 
Last edited:
.
While it's important to note SL has 10% to 15% of debt to China, the critical question is what proportion of interest payments does that represent. If the the average interest on that is 3 times the rate than others, then you are talking about 50% of payments to one place. Also typically WB or Imf projects have stringent conditions on viability and corruption. In that respect the Chinese projects seems like they are purposefully built to ensnare by building useless and expensive projects
China lowest interest rate.
The rest, especially commercial loan are much higher.

Do you homework before posting.
 
.
Home work cannot be done because the terms and conditions s are under non disclosure with corrupt governments. Unlike WB and IMf these loans have lot of murkiness underneath. And in any case the rates are still higher than market.
You go check Sri Lanka official data, the external loan rate is public.

You think IMF and WB has no strings attached, where did you live in past 70 years?
 
.
Sri Lanka is simply owing too much money to EU banks.

Loans from China are negligible amount as these loans were contra when Sri Lanka leased out her port to China.

So happens that the port fitted China BRI purpose and the deal was made.

So stop all the Western and US nonsensical China debt Trap BS.

Once IMF steps in, the real pain begins.

Sri Lanka has to learn how to manage her own economy properly and the best way is to stop politicking.

How about starting by preparing a feasible recovery proposal to China or other friendly and willing to lend nations?

China and its regulators needed to be convinced.

No more Chinese ATM machines.
 
. .

China Hesitates on Bailing Out Sri Lanka, Pakistan as Debt Soars​

Bloomberg News
Wed, April 13, 2022, 6:24 PM·5 min read
62473ff1682de141e8221bdbb66efdb7

(Bloomberg) -- Over the past few years, the U.S. has accused China of using “debt diplomacy” to make developing nations across the world more dependent on Beijing.

Yet the cases of Sri Lanka and Pakistan -- both friends of China facing dire financial situations as inflation soars -- show that President Xi Jinping’s government is becoming more reluctant to pull out the checkbook. China still hasn’t made good on a pledge to re-issue loans totaling $4 billion that Pakistan repaid in late March, and it hasn’t responded to Sri Lanka’s pleas for $2.5 billion in credit support.

While China has pledged to help both countries, the more cautious approach reflects both a refining of Xi’s signature Belt and Road Initiative as well as a hesitancy to be seen interfering in messy domestic political situations. Pakistan got a new prime minister on Monday after parliament booted out former cricket star Imran Khan, and Sri Lanka’s leader is facing pressure from protesters to step down.

“Beijing has for the past couple of years been rethinking its external lending because their banks realized they were carrying a lot of debt with countries whose prospects of paying back were quite limited,” said Raffaello Pantucci, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University. “This came on top of a tightening economic situation at home which also required a lot of spending, so there was less appetite to just throw money around wantonly.”

China is currently facing its own economic troubles, with lockdowns to contain the country’s worst Covid outbreak since early 2020 shutting down the technology and financial hubs of Shanghai and Shenzhen. Premier Li Keqiang on Monday told local authorities they should “add a sense of urgency” when implementing policies as analysts warn the official growth target of a 5.5% is now in jeopardy.


China has become the world’s largest government creditor over the past decade, with its state-owned policy banks lending more to developing countries than the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank in some recent years. The opacity around the terms and scale of some of that lending has been criticized, especially as the pandemic exacerbates debt problems in poorer countries.

Sri Lanka was downgraded deeper into junk by Fitch Ratings, which said on Wednesday the nation’s decision to suspend payments on its foreign debt has kicked off a sovereign default process. S&P said Sri Lanka’s next interest payments are due on April 18 and the failure to cover them will likely result in default, as would an outright debt restructuring.

Sri Lanka’s top diplomat in Beijing this week said he was “very confident” that China will come through with credit support, including $1 billion for the country to repay existing Chinese loans due in July. In an interview with Bloomberg, Ambassador Palitha Kohona said the process often takes months and he didn’t see any delay.

“Given the current circumstances, there aren’t that many countries that can step out to the pitch and do something,” he said. “China is one of those countries that can do something very quickly.”

Still, China’s role in helping to resolve ongoing crises in South Asia may be limited despite its status as a major creditor. A Shanghai-based scholar who researches China’s overseas lending said new credit lines are harder to approve as authorities emphasize risk management at financial institutions including policy banks. The scholar asked not to be named due to rules for speaking with the media.

Xi highlighted the importance of a more cautious approach at a high-level Belt and Road symposium in November. “It is necessary to implement risk prevention and control systems,” Xi said. He called on participants to make “small but beautiful” projects a priority for foreign cooperation and “avoid dangerous and chaotic places.”

Earlier this month, Jin Liqun, president of the China-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, encouraged Sri Lanka to turn to the IMF for help in a meeting with Kohona.

‘Sinking Ships’

China’s development banks are acting to preserve returns and it “would be difficult for them to easily accede to Sri Lanka’s requests for deferrals,” said Matthew Mingey, a senior analyst at Rhodium Group’s China Macro & Policy team who researches economic diplomacy.

“Credit conditions back in China aren’t making things any easier for them,” he added. “Ultimately, Sri Lanka needs the IMF.”

Sri Lanka said Tuesday it would expedite talks with the IMF after it halted payments on foreign debt to preserve dollars for essential food and fuel imports. Pakistan’s new government also plans to work with the IMF to stabilize the economy, according to Miftah Ismail, a former finance minister and a senior ruling party leader.

China’s ability to assist either country with a balance-of-payments crisis is limited, particularly as Beijing’s financial assistance is almost always tied to specific projects, said Muttukrishna Sarvananthan, principle researcher at the Point Pedro Institute of Development in Sri Lanka. China’s policy of non-interference in internal affairs prevents it from offering the type of advice needed for countries to emerge out of a financial crisis, he added.

“Even the IMF appears to be moving very slowly -- if not abandoning -- the requests of both Pakistan and Sri Lanka for their assistance,” Sarvananthan said. “Which sane bilateral donor country or international financial institution would pour money into sinking ships in both Pakistan and Sri Lanka.”

(Updates with Fitch downgrade in seventh paragraph.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

Lesson for those who want to do every project in CPEC without cost anaylsis
Yeah sure skiming top 20% is good for you but keep debt limits in mind
 
.
They are transparent and has conditions to implement .
China has undisclosed elements that maybe the most crucial elements. Its nit coincidence that so many are becoming debt ridden after signing up OBOR
You do understand Sri Lanka deep society issue is due to civil war, and India interference, don't you?

It was China helped Sri Lanka to end the bloody civil war and get Tamil Tigers eliminated, which is a terrorist org.

The recent issues were caused by Rajapaksa family mismanagement.

If you don't understand the background, please ignore me.
 
.
I understand the background better than you do. it is a strategy of the Chinese to build a number of useless projects that wont pay for itself and also sign with corrupt politicians deals that can't be disclosed - like in Pakistan and SL and African countries. So you can ignore me if you only want to believe the lies spread by the CPC.
That is the invention of IMF/WB. If you want to accuse of China being a copycat, you should say it outright. No need to go around.
 
.
It’s in world interest to bail out Pakistan and never let it default.
If Pakistan defaults and a ttp type ideology takes over the country including its nukes, the world will become a very dangerous place especially dangerous for all our neighbours.
 
. .
I have been employed with WB. Its is a non profit organization and it only prescribes steps (some times tough) when countries ask for its help. But those steps are typically warranted and very transparent. It does not take over sovereignty of nations and is very different from what China is doing. there is no comparison of WB to malafide intentions.
Hahaha, you feel like a decision maker in WB, don't you?
 
.
I was not. but I had a view.
Sure. You are certainly entitled to have your own view. But other than just having some views, if you still have curiosity towards truth, you can learn some history of IMF/WB about using debt rollovers (so called bailout in this post), guaranteed by US taxpayers, to ensure continuous interest payment flow into commercial banks and prop up the foreign governments.
 
.
take a step back. Before bail out. WB or IM would have never sponsored hambantota or Gwadar or some white elephant project in Ethiopia. WB is non-profit and shares are held with multiple countries including China and India. the recipient countries bad mouth them because the corrupt want free money without accountability. The stringent conditions are a problem for them, but those steps are typically needed. eg India went to IMF in 1991 and opened up and devalued currency. Its been good for the country. India takes loans for large public projects from WB. but these projects are typically needed and pay for themselves over time. My last post on this topic.
Many loans are for political purposes. These two institutions are not for economic reason only. Keep that in mind.
 
.
Many loans are for political purposes. These two institutions are not for economic reason only. Keep that in mind.
Bro, no need to waste your time on those who can't do the math.

Sri Lanka has 50 billions dollar liability, how much of it comes from China, little.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom