What's new

China Has Border Disputes With 17 Countries

I don't know or care who Peter Zeihan is....sounds like a Chinese expat who got tired of the CCP........and went rogue.

Like this one:

Guo Wengui


Although I do respect Guo Wengui since he was in CCP's inner circle before his defection and most of his claims have proven to be true like Jack Ma being pressured by the CCP to sell his shares (and retire, which he did) since that's what a patriotic Chinese would do.

The Gem:


You should, since Peter is one of the most influential (if wrong) "geostrategists" in the government ruling you.

Gio Wengui is also associated with Steve Bannon and both are under investigation for fraud in the US.
 
.
Gio Wengui is also associated with Steve Bannon and both are under investigation for fraud in the US.


Need a source saying Guo Wengui is under investigation for fraud.....I know Steve Bannon is. And if the "investigation" is filed by the CCP....well, might as well forget about it since Wengui is someone the US won't give up easily.
 
.
Need a source saying Guo Wengui is under investigation for fraud.....I know Steve Bannon is. And if the "investigation" is filed by the CCP....well, might as well forget about it since Wengui is someone the US won't give up easily.

I do not shoot from the hip.


 
.
I do not shoot from the hip.



The WSJ article is locked behind a paywall.....would appreciate something I can read.
 
.
I don't know or care who Peter Zeihan is....sounds like a Chinese expat who got tired of the CCP........and went rogue.

Like this one:

Guo Wengui


Although I do respect Guo Wengui since he was in CCP's inner circle before his defection and most of his claims have proven to be true like Jack Ma being pressured by the CCP to sell his shares (and retire, which he did) since that's what a patriotic Chinese would do.

The Gem:

How did I miss these videos :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
. . .
we dont have any dispute with china .
Of course you dont. Disputes occur only when one side claims something and other side disagrees or counters. NOT when, one side happily "gifts" away anything that the other side claims. If fact, in this case, its a very "harmonious" relationship.
 
. .
Indians say China has border disagreement with Bhutan, this is the only thing I know, but China and Bhutan never had problems.
Are you living under rock? Do you guys have any opinion?

 
.
Your countrymen claim half of Tajikistan and have already gotten some parts of it...
China has no territorial disputes Tajikstan, it was long settle. Some people can claim whatever they want, but what does it have to do with China's official stance?
 
.
Are you living under rock? Do you guys have any opinion?

China and Bhutan enjoy very good relations, Bhutan is a vassal state of India, we all know this, without India, the two countries never had any problems and confrontations, everything can be settled peacefully like China did with a dozen of other neighbors.
 
.
Indians say China has border disagreement with Bhutan, this is the only thing I know, but China and Bhutan never had problems.
You know only what you want to know.
For e.g. you dont even know that someone somewhere is desperate to be a global power.
You dont even know that the China Virus is gift of China to the world.
You dont even know that two oldest civilizations of the world should join hands instead of fighting.
Petty border disputes and cheap politics around it are VERY RECENT & MODERN phenomena in human history. Old, knowledgeable, experience, GYANI, enlightened people (or civilizations) hardly every fought like children over material disputes. Even when they did, they (both sides) made sure that ALL attempts for peace are exhausted. China is NOT displaying any of those attributes of OLD EXPERIENCED KNOWLEDGEABLE civilization. It is trying to become a very recent concept of "global power" even at the cost of losing its own identity.
Nevermind.
 
Last edited:
.
China has no territorial disputes Tajikstan, it was long settle. Some people can claim whatever they want, but what does it have to do with China's official stance?
"China's official stance" does not suffice to mean there is "no dispute". For e.g. others may have different official (or unofficial) stances.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom