What's new

China Has Border Disputes With 17 Countries

Medium link has a higher number, of over 80 million. Maybe you don't understand the logistics of genocide in an fascist regime. It is extremely difficult to pinpoint an exact figure.

It's difficult because there's no evidence at the time. Making up numbers that are large but somewhat believable to the simple minded is indeed hard.

Even the US has not provided any physical evidence despite overflying China with U-2 spy planes at the time, multiple times.

Meanwhile less advanced US planes had clear pictures of Nazi camps in the 1940s. Same with Soviet gulags from the U-2.
 
.
There is no evidence for 50 million. Nazi graves are still being dug up all over Europe, but no graves or evidence of a cover-up has ever been discovered in China, including by the US, of mass death during the late 1950s.

The death rate in developing countries in that time was indeed higher, definitely so during poor harvest years while under sanctions. China did not worse than any other developing country.
You are defending Mao? How pathetic and disgusting. Mao is a pig who is burning in 7th level of hell for his crimes against humanity. He will suffer one of the most severe punishments delivered to all humankind.

By the way, I'll let an Indian debunk your claims of "3 million dying a year today due to hunger". Which sounds pretty ridiculous & pulled out of the arsenal.
 
.
You are defending Mao? How pathetic and disgusting. Mao is a pig who is burning in 7th level of hell for his crimes against humanity. He will suffer one of the most severe punishments delivered to all humankind.

By the way, I'll let an Indian debunk your claims of "3 million dying a year today due to hunger". Which sounds pretty ridiculous & pulled out of the arsenal.

I didn't claim it. BBC and Indian Express did.

You ever think why some countries succeed and others don't?

You can speculate about hell or whatever but you are suffering on Earth, right now. Who is being punished?
 
.
For people claiming he is India, shirvan is Azerbaijani turk and if u subscribe to him on patreon u can see the resources he used in his videos.
 
. .
The false believer is worse than the non-believer.


False believers are being delivered earthly judgement

This must be the face of a pious believer:

1601080208240.png
 
. .
Lmao.....do you even know what a Munafiq is???

Either way, we can't have religious discussion on this thread. Discuss the OP's video.

video is the private opinion of a person of little knowledge, power or influence. why are his opinions important?
 
. .
video is the private opinion of a person of little knowledge, power or influence. why are his opinions important?

What this guy wrote:
Because he's a relevant geo-politicist that makes informative, factual, and entertaining videos.

...and why are your opinions important.


Although I don't agree with Caspian Report on all his views, he's still the most neutral, informative and factual guy available currently on the internet for geo-politics and more...

When is China going to produce someone like him??

All we get are Chinese professors ranting about how they own half the known world. :lol:
 
.
What this guy wrote:



Although I don't agree with Caspian Report on all his views, he's still the most neutral, informative and factual guy available currently on the internet for geo-politics and more...

When is China going to produce someone like him??

All we get are Chinese professors ranting about how they own half the known world. :lol:

the difference is 2fold: he does not cite sources, and he does not have the ability to implement policy. Not citing sources means nobody really knows what you are saying is true or not, nor if true, how reliable it is. Not being able to implement policy means you are an outsider that doesn't know all the facts.

Chinese professors on the other hand have PhDs - which means at the very least, they have to cite sources - and often have the ear of policymakers or are policy makers themselves.

Wang Huning was a professor before he became a Politburo member, for example.
 
. .
the difference is 2fold: he does not cite sources, and he does not have the ability to implement policy.


Anyone can cite made up sources to claim that they're right.....the Indian media does it on a regular basis....doesn't prove them right.

While Caspian Report may not have the ability to implement any policy, he's influencing the general masses better than any politician can and as for his sources, he doesn't release them since then people like your government will go after them......Caspian Report got recently hacked too so he has to be careful.

On the other hand, since all of his narrative and opinions match with his past observations and the current geopolitical scene around the world, there is no need to cite "sources".

Anyone interested in geopolitics knows what he's talking about and can Google/lookup the info.
 
Last edited:
.
Anyone can cite made up sources to claim that they're right.....the Indian media does it on a regular basis....doesn't prove them right.

While Caspian Report may not have the ability to implement any policy, he's influencing the general masses better than any politician can and as for his sources, he doesn't release them since then people like your government will go after them......Caspian Report got recently hacked too so he has to be careful.

On the other hand, since all of his narrative and opinions match with his past observations and the current geopolitical scene around the world, there is no need to "sources".

Anyone interested in geopolitics knows what he's talking about and can Google/lookup the info.

So everything you say applies to Peter Zeihan, a US geopolitical favorite that also influences the masses and also doesn't like citing sources. He convinced them that China already collapsed in 2010.

The current delusional psychosis you see is the result of that.

Being influential doesn't mean being right.
 
.
So everything you say applies to Peter Zeihan, a US geopolitical favorite that also influences the masses and also doesn't like citing sources. He convinced them that China already collapsed in 2010.

The current delusional psychosis you see is the result of that.

Being influential doesn't mean being right.

I don't know or care who Peter Zeihan is....sounds like a Chinese expat who got tired of the CCP........and went rogue.

Like this one:

Guo Wengui


Although I do respect Guo Wengui since he was in CCP's inner circle before his defection and most of his claims have proven to be true like Jack Ma being pressured by the CCP to sell his shares (and retire, which he did) since that's what a patriotic Chinese would do.

The Gem:

 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom